Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.004998/0.004998, allocations: 100.4 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.016 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001205/0.001205, allocations: 181.7 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.938 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.328/1.328, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.07 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.418/2.418, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7105 GB, free: 4.406 MB / 0.5762 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001255/0.001255, allocations: 55.91 kB / 1.019 GB, free: 9.352 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7986/0.7998, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 3.805 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.02988/0.8298, allocations: 31.78 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 3.906 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01732/0.8471, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 7.586 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002096/0.8492, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.21 GB, free: 7.527 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003162/0.8524, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 6.414 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005331/0.8578, allocations: 2.085 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 4.32 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004804/0.8626, allocations: 1.87 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 2.457 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02146/0.8841, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 14.87 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01082/0.895, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.241 GB, free: 7.602 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01105/0.9061, allocations: 6.472 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 1.133 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008971/0.915, allocations: 5.344 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002607/0.9177, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009986/0.9277, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 7.793 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007001/0.9347, allocations: 3 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 4.785 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0137/0.9484, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 20 kB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02072/0.9692, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 492 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.195e-06/0.9693, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 488 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.254e-06/0.9693, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 488 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004472/0.9697, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 488 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03164/1.001, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 4.609 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.613e-05/1.001, allocations: 16.88 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 4.594 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004378/1.006, allocations: 0.9247 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 3.664 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02303/1.029, allocations: 9.674 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.918 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003571/1.029, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.594 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001833/1.031, allocations: 487.9 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.117 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01344/1.045, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 2.926 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000154/1.045, allocations: 23.92 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 2.902 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001028/1.046, allocations: 144 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 2.762 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001082/1.046, allocations: 95.94 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 2.668 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009654/1.056, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 13.89 MB / 1.045 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06121/1.117, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 10.44 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01302/1.13, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 4.109 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004529/1.134, allocations: 2.553 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 1.555 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0276/1.162, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 3.773 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004067/1.166, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 1.617 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.231e-06/1.166, allocations: 0 / 1.369 GB, free: 1.617 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03341/1.2, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 3.168 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.907e-05/1.2, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 3.008 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02601/1.226, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 8.582 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001626/1.228, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 8.461 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006796/1.234, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 5.102 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002351/1.237, allocations: 0.9182 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 4.176 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004458/1.241, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 2.957 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.646e-05/1.241, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 2.656 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006176/1.248, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 15.18 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007789/1.255, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 8.043 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06412/1.32, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 1.957 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.54e-05/1.32, allocations: 24 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 1.934 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02069/1.34, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.73 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001461/1.341, allocations: 66.64 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.66 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001597/1.341, allocations: 84 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 7.578 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001896/1.343, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 6.844 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005804/1.348, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 5.359 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01304/1.361, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 5.859 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01042/1.372, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 4.684 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001339/1.373, allocations: 280 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 4.41 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01262/1.386, allocations: 7.077 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009265/1.395, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 6.184 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06523/1.461, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 164 kB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.91e-05/1.461, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 140 kB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01955/1.48, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 5.941 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001226/1.48, allocations: 77.94 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 5.859 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001419/1.481, allocations: 84 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 5.777 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001732/1.482, allocations: 0.7086 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 5.047 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005777/1.488, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 3.566 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01276/1.501, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 4.066 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01021/1.511, allocations: 1.193 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 2.871 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001365/1.512, allocations: 276 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002679/1.515, allocations: 0.7619 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 1.836 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003449/1.519, allocations: 0.6946 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 1.137 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01143/1.53, allocations: 5.154 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.859e-05/1.53, allocations: 20 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.72e-05/1.53, allocations: 8 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 11.92 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006399/1.537, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 7.93 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.6966/2.233, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 370.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.408e-06/2.233, allocations: 0 / 1.571 GB, free: 370.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002392/2.236, allocations: 0.6051 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 370.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001422/2.237, allocations: 0.5809 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 370.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002691/2.237, allocations: 131.2 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 370.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008893/2.246, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 359.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.446e-06/2.246, allocations: 6.688 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 359.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0113/2.258, allocations: 7.154 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 357.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004246/2.262, allocations: 1.702 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 356.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001504/2.263, allocations: 125 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 356.6 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004302/2.268, allocations: 0.6076 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 356.6 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004016/2.268, allocations: 170.1 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 356.6 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001777/2.268, allocations: 82.25 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 356.5 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01149/2.28, allocations: 7.336 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 354.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.81e-07/2.28, allocations: 3.844 kB / 1.603 GB, free: 354.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01338/2.293, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 351.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00201/2.295, allocations: 0.599 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 351 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01711/2.312, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 338.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.002e-05/2.312, allocations: 3.688 kB / 1.621 GB, free: 338.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003665/2.316, allocations: 3.05 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 335.2 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0141/2.33, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.627 GB, free: 332.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.02444/2.355, allocations: 18.98 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 313.5 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005066/2.36, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 308.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01268/2.372, allocations: 6.423 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 301.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00197/2.374, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.657 GB, free: 301.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.323e-06/2.374, allocations: 0 / 1.657 GB, free: 301.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1671/2.542, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.792 GB, free: 165 MB / 1.295 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches