Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007715/0.007715, allocations: 97.39 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.004 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001639/0.001639, allocations: 199.3 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 5.934 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.389/1.389, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.348 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.533/2.533, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7105 GB, free: 4.973 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001147/0.001147, allocations: 63.91 kB / 1.019 GB, free: 14.54 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2862/0.2874, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 6.789 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03033/0.3178, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 6.898 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0189/0.3367, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 10.57 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002823/0.3396, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.21 GB, free: 10.51 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003455/0.343, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 9.398 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007073/0.3502, allocations: 2.083 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005589/0.3558, allocations: 1.865 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 5.449 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0203/0.3761, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 1.867 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009465/0.3857, allocations: 7.193 MB / 1.241 GB, free: 10.59 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01115/0.3968, allocations: 6.467 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 4.121 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.6444/1.041, allocations: 5.342 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 19.37 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003081/1.044, allocations: 0.7487 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 19.37 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009206/1.054, allocations: 3.217 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 19.37 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005501/1.059, allocations: 2.996 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 19.37 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01477/1.074, allocations: 4.751 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 18.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02657/1.101, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 17.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.792e-06/1.101, allocations: 0.75 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 17.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.733e-06/1.101, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 17.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004213/1.101, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 17.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03953/1.141, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.619e-05/1.141, allocations: 9.219 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.006383/1.147, allocations: 0.9184 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.73 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02616/1.173, allocations: 9.687 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.54 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000439/1.174, allocations: 334.2 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002989/1.177, allocations: 482.7 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01363/1.19, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.918 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.769e-05/1.19, allocations: 19.61 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.914 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0005074/1.191, allocations: 143.8 kB / 1.307 GB, free: 7.809 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001098/1.191, allocations: 92.94 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.805 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009191/1.2, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 6.422 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06545/1.266, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.68 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01191/1.278, allocations: 6.226 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003842/1.282, allocations: 2.546 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 9.129 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02624/1.308, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.69 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003175/1.311, allocations: 2.138 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 3.757e-06/1.311, allocations: 1.219 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03001/1.341, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.338e-05/1.341, allocations: 136.1 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01907/1.36, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001399/1.362, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.441 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004257/1.366, allocations: 3.337 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 1.113 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002177/1.368, allocations: 0.9139 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 216 kB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002251/1.37, allocations: 1.216 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001585/1.371, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005264/1.376, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 11.23 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007316/1.383, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 4.137 MB / 1.076 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05606/1.439, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.39 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 5.704e-05/1.439, allocations: 24 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.37 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01738/1.457, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.688 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.917e-05/1.457, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.617 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001063/1.457, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.531 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001613/1.459, allocations: 0.7071 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 3.809 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004904/1.464, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.422 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01191/1.475, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 3.051 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009743/1.485, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.875 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009304/1.486, allocations: 281.2 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.602 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0116/1.498, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007178/1.505, allocations: 5.926 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.414 MB / 1.154 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05732/1.562, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.75 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.846e-05/1.562, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02096/1.583, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 4.055 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001275/1.584, allocations: 67.11 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.984 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001511/1.584, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.895 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001807/1.586, allocations: 0.7112 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 3.168 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005959/1.592, allocations: 1.484 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.777 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01265/1.604, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01065/1.615, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 1.215 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001504/1.616, allocations: 280 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.9414 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002504/1.619, allocations: 0.7639 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 276 kB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002875/1.622, allocations: 0.6986 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01035/1.632, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.62e-05/1.632, allocations: 20 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.212e-05/1.632, allocations: 8 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005923/1.638, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 6.395 MB / 1.232 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02725/1.665, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.84 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.087e-05/1.665, allocations: 4 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.836 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002512/1.668, allocations: 0.6088 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 8.246 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001494/1.67, allocations: 0.5813 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000298/1.67, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.572 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01211/1.682, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 8.215 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.336e-05/1.682, allocations: 10.56 kB / 1.587 GB, free: 8.207 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01197/1.694, allocations: 7.155 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.9844 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004938/1.699, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 15.26 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001693/1.701, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.004561/1.705, allocations: 0.6121 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004699/1.706, allocations: 160.3 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.37 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002382/1.706, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.29 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01946/1.725, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 6.957 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.01e-07/1.725, allocations: 0 / 1.603 GB, free: 6.957 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01974/1.745, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002423/1.748, allocations: 0.5998 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 2.445 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02407/1.772, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 5.328 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.378e-05/1.772, allocations: 4 kB / 1.621 GB, free: 5.324 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005191/1.777, allocations: 3.059 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 2.219 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01841/1.795, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.627 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03425/1.83, allocations: 18.99 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 12.34 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007357/1.837, allocations: 5.371 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 6.93 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01479/1.852, allocations: 6.428 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 0.5117 MB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002658/1.855, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.657 GB, free: 96 kB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.82e-07/1.855, allocations: 0 / 1.657 GB, free: 96 kB / 1.326 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2155/2.07, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.792 GB, free: 7.992 MB / 1.467 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches