Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007227/0.007227, allocations: 99.73 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 5.594 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001698/0.001698, allocations: 197.2 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.527 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.277/1.277, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.08 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.051/2.051, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 0.6641 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001143/0.001143, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.9504 GB, free: 8.129 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7076/0.7088, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 5.277 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03269/0.7415, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 14.55 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01828/0.7598, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.844 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002579/0.7625, allocations: 63.75 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.82 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003513/0.766, allocations: 1.098 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 5.238 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00619/0.7722, allocations: 2.086 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 4.023 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005637/0.7779, allocations: 1.871 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 3.09 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02403/0.8019, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01108/0.813, allocations: 7.206 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 7.668 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0124/0.8255, allocations: 6.459 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 4.387 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00968/0.8352, allocations: 5.346 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 1.172 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002753/0.8379, allocations: 0.7495 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.172 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009465/0.8474, allocations: 3.217 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005478/0.8529, allocations: 2.995 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 13.66 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01107/0.864, allocations: 4.754 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 10.44 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01936/0.8834, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 11.16 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.103e-06/0.8834, allocations: 4 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 11.15 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.573e-06/0.8834, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 11.15 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004126/0.8839, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 11.15 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02944/0.9133, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.55 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.272e-05/0.9134, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001485/0.9149, allocations: 0.4961 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003433/0.9183, allocations: 0.8764 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02068/0.939, allocations: 9.616 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.457 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003782/0.9394, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.125 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001543/0.941, allocations: 475.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 3.66 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01113/0.9521, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.46 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001077/0.9522, allocations: 15.81 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.45 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007995/0.9531, allocations: 144 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.31 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.637e-05/0.9532, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.21 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008028/0.9612, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.441 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05446/1.016, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 5.023 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01179/1.027, allocations: 6.23 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 14.69 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004113/1.032, allocations: 2.556 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 12.13 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02523/1.057, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.35 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003334/1.06, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.059e-06/1.06, allocations: 0 / 1.29 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02693/1.087, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.358e-05/1.087, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 13.83 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02007/1.107, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.414 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001231/1.109, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.289 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005062/1.114, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001828/1.116, allocations: 0.8745 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 15.08 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00339/1.119, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.053e-05/1.119, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 13.57 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005249/1.124, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006665/1.131, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 2.965 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05462/1.186, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 12.87 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.443e-05/1.186, allocations: 31.94 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0166/1.202, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.676 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001019/1.203, allocations: 69.64 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001106/1.203, allocations: 88.06 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.516 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001591/1.204, allocations: 0.7129 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 1.781 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004884/1.209, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 304 kB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01106/1.22, allocations: 14.5 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 0.8203 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008625/1.229, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.63 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009939/1.23, allocations: 272 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.37 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0106/1.241, allocations: 7.092 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.262 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006883/1.247, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05463/1.302, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.345e-05/1.302, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.07 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01694/1.319, allocations: 10.06 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 0.9219 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.469e-05/1.319, allocations: 73.05 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 0.8477 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001082/1.319, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 0.7617 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001554/1.321, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 32 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004922/1.326, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.54 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01116/1.337, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008714/1.346, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.86 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001047/1.347, allocations: 276 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001928/1.349, allocations: 0.7572 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 12.82 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00223/1.351, allocations: 0.6671 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.14 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009384/1.36, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.965 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.736e-05/1.36, allocations: 28 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.938 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.785e-05/1.361, allocations: 8 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.93 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005744/1.366, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 2.926 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02626/1.393, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.277 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.23e-05/1.393, allocations: 4 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.273 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002523/1.395, allocations: 0.5931 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 4.68 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001416/1.397, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.074 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003478/1.397, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 3.941 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01094/1.408, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.578 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.24e-06/1.408, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.57 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01259/1.421, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006699/1.427, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.67 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002723/1.43, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.55 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00581/1.436, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006441/1.437, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004193/1.437, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.69 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0145/1.451, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.363 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.81e-07/1.452, allocations: 0 / 1.524 GB, free: 3.363 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01604/1.468, allocations: 3.957 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01407/1.482, allocations: 8.188 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 7.129 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01992/1.502, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 9.512 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.104e-05/1.502, allocations: 4 kB / 1.549 GB, free: 9.508 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004406/1.506, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.552 GB, free: 6.371 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01483/1.521, allocations: 2.932 MB / 1.555 GB, free: 3.488 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.6185/2.139, allocations: 79.75 MB / 1.632 GB, free: 390.2 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005638/2.145, allocations: 5.381 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 388.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01187/2.157, allocations: 6.422 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 388.4 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004691/2.162, allocations: 2.982 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 386 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.81e-07/2.162, allocations: 0 / 1.647 GB, free: 386 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.2398/2.402, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.844 GB, free: 198.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 23.86/26.27, allocations: 11.08 kB / 1.844 GB, free: 198.6 MB / 1.311 GB (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches