Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007072/0.007072, allocations: 100.5 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.008 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001703/0.001703, allocations: 195.4 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.93 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.281/1.281, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.14 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.126/2.126, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 0.6289 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002016/0.002016, allocations: 67.89 kB / 0.9504 GB, free: 8.098 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7377/0.7398, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.087 GB, free: 5.25 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03567/0.7755, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.118 GB, free: 14.53 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01941/0.7949, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 5.824 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00258/0.7975, allocations: 62.97 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 5.801 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00349/0.8011, allocations: 1.106 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 5.211 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00637/0.8075, allocations: 2.079 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 4.004 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005734/0.8132, allocations: 1.878 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 3.062 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02482/0.8381, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01133/0.8494, allocations: 7.204 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 7.688 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01287/0.8623, allocations: 6.47 MB / 1.168 GB, free: 4.398 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009854/0.8722, allocations: 5.346 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 1.184 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002899/0.8751, allocations: 0.7534 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.18 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01029/0.8854, allocations: 3.213 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 15.72 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006005/0.8915, allocations: 2.999 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 13.67 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01149/0.903, allocations: 4.751 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 10.45 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02218/0.9252, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.633e-06/0.9253, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.773e-06/0.9253, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004345/0.9257, allocations: 4 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 11.16 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03027/0.956, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.666e-05/0.9561, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.55 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001556/0.9576, allocations: 0.4884 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00353/0.9612, allocations: 0.8764 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.16 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0205/0.9817, allocations: 9.624 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.469 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003298/0.982, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.145 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001601/0.9837, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 3.668 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01135/0.995, allocations: 5.952 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001089/0.9952, allocations: 19.81 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.46 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000646/0.9958, allocations: 144 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001073/0.9959, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008076/1.004, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.457 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0579/1.062, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 5.039 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01221/1.074, allocations: 6.238 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 14.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004093/1.078, allocations: 2.541 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 12.15 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02513/1.103, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.37 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003251/1.107, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.4e-06/1.107, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.2 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02882/1.136, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.599e-05/1.136, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01938/1.155, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.422 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008333/1.156, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.297 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004381/1.16, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 15.98 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00187/1.162, allocations: 0.8784 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003215/1.166, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 13.88 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001022/1.166, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005484/1.171, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00723/1.178, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 2.977 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05617/1.235, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 12.89 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.386e-05/1.235, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 12.86 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01741/1.252, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001167/1.252, allocations: 73.62 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.625 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001227/1.252, allocations: 84 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.543 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001725/1.254, allocations: 0.7164 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 1.805 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005161/1.259, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 332 kB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01241/1.272, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 0.832 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008801/1.281, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.64 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001034/1.282, allocations: 276 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.38 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01116/1.293, allocations: 7.091 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.27 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007258/1.3, allocations: 5.92 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.145 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05729/1.357, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.469e-05/1.357, allocations: 24 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01758/1.375, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 0.9336 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001187/1.375, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 0.8594 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001207/1.375, allocations: 84 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 0.7773 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001663/1.377, allocations: 0.7131 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 44 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005134/1.382, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.55 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01232/1.394, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009045/1.404, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001092/1.405, allocations: 272 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.6 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002045/1.407, allocations: 0.7575 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 12.83 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002611/1.409, allocations: 0.6671 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.16 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01012/1.419, allocations: 5.141 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.98 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.852e-05/1.42, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.953 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.904e-05/1.42, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 6.949 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005895/1.425, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 2.949 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02713/1.453, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.301 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.334e-05/1.453, allocations: 352 / 1.492 GB, free: 5.301 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002602/1.455, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 4.703 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001507/1.457, allocations: 0.5834 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.098 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004066/1.457, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 3.965 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01211/1.469, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.594 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.045e-06/1.469, allocations: 4 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.59 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.012/1.481, allocations: 7.11 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 13.39 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005154/1.487, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.7 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002422/1.489, allocations: 127.8 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.57 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.0056/1.495, allocations: 0.6199 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005113/1.495, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002971/1.495, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 10.71 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01467/1.51, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.387 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.924e-06/1.51, allocations: 0 / 1.524 GB, free: 3.387 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01635/1.527, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.42 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01462/1.541, allocations: 8.184 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 7.148 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02109/1.562, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 9.531 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.857e-06/1.562, allocations: 0 / 1.549 GB, free: 9.531 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004757/1.567, allocations: 3.055 MB / 1.552 GB, free: 6.383 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01519/1.582, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 3.496 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.6256/2.208, allocations: 79.74 MB / 1.632 GB, free: 393.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007863/2.216, allocations: 5.376 MB / 1.638 GB, free: 392 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0134/2.229, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 391.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005504/2.235, allocations: 2.973 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 389.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.01e-07/2.235, allocations: 0 / 1.647 GB, free: 389.5 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.2314/2.466, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.844 GB, free: 203.9 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 24.07/26.54, allocations: 19.53 kB / 1.844 GB, free: 203.9 MB / 1.311 GB (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches