Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001362/0.001362, allocations: 108 kB / 15.61 MB, free: 152 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001557/0.001557, allocations: 195 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.664 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.36/1.36, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.371 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.918/2.918, allocations: 472.6 MB / 0.7451 GB, free: 4.645 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001315/0.001315, allocations: 61.16 kB / 0.912 GB, free: 33.39 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3331/0.3344, allocations: 159.9 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03261/0.3671, allocations: 31.78 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 10.58 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01838/0.3855, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001981/0.3875, allocations: 63.56 kB / 1.111 GB, free: 14.21 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003217/0.3908, allocations: 1.107 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 13.1 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005593/0.3964, allocations: 2.088 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005138/0.4016, allocations: 1.842 MB / 1.116 GB, free: 9.164 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02066/0.4222, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 5.586 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01026/0.4325, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01232/0.4449, allocations: 6.445 MB / 1.149 GB, free: 7.875 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01053/0.4554, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.154 GB, free: 2.367 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002802/0.4583, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 1.617 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008616/0.4669, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 14.39 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004539/0.4715, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 11.45 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.00898/0.4805, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 6.68 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01804/0.4985, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 7.316 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.632e-06/0.4986, allocations: 4 kB / 1.18 GB, free: 7.312 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.893e-06/0.4986, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.312 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004746/0.4991, allocations: 0 / 1.18 GB, free: 7.312 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03065/0.5297, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.307e-05/0.5298, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.192 GB, free: 11.7 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003889/0.5337, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 10.82 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02137/0.5551, allocations: 9.356 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003653/0.5555, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 1.059 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00178/0.5573, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.202 GB, free: 0.5898 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01314/0.5704, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001805/0.5707, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001035/0.5717, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001092/0.5718, allocations: 95.94 kB / 1.208 GB, free: 10.13 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009602/0.5814, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 5.359 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06038/0.6419, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 1.805 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.5672/1.209, allocations: 6.225 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003773/1.213, allocations: 2.516 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 161 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02813/1.241, allocations: 13.22 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 156 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003982/1.245, allocations: 2.135 MB / 1.27 GB, free: 155.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.24e-06/1.245, allocations: 1.312 kB / 1.27 GB, free: 155.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0294/1.275, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 149.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.447e-05/1.275, allocations: 132.4 kB / 1.283 GB, free: 149.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0192/1.294, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 145.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008133/1.295, allocations: 114.1 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 145.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003511/1.298, allocations: 3.307 MB / 1.297 GB, free: 142.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00169/1.3, allocations: 0.8681 MB / 1.298 GB, free: 142 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001884/1.302, allocations: 1.215 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 141.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.506e-05/1.302, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 141.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004219/1.306, allocations: 3.45 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 139.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005483/1.312, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 134.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04832/1.36, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 100.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.48e-05/1.36, allocations: 28 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 100.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01653/1.377, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 90.44 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001084/1.377, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 90.36 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001411/1.377, allocations: 88 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 90.28 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0015/1.378, allocations: 0.7095 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 89.55 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004969/1.383, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 88.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008967/1.392, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.371 GB, free: 72.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01003/1.402, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.372 GB, free: 71.42 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001323/1.404, allocations: 281.9 kB / 1.372 GB, free: 71.15 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01069/1.415, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 64.05 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005869/1.42, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 56.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04832/1.469, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 18.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.839e-05/1.469, allocations: 24 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 18.89 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0179/1.487, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001265/1.487, allocations: 72.55 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 8.652 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001491/1.487, allocations: 84.84 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 8.57 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001563/1.489, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 7.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005197/1.494, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 6.355 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01155/1.506, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 6.871 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01028/1.516, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.688 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001392/1.517, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 5.418 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0025/1.52, allocations: 0.761 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 4.648 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003253/1.523, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 3.98 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01145/1.535, allocations: 5.141 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 14.81 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.597e-05/1.535, allocations: 35.92 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.491e-05/1.535, allocations: 4 kB / 1.455 GB, free: 14.77 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006639/1.541, allocations: 3.954 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 10.78 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03299/1.574, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 13.18 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.349e-05/1.574, allocations: 4 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 13.18 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00274/1.577, allocations: 0.6011 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 12.58 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001668/1.579, allocations: 0.5773 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004837/1.579, allocations: 143.8 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01306/1.592, allocations: 14.37 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 8.737e-06/1.592, allocations: 12.02 kB / 1.487 GB, free: 12.49 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01508/1.607, allocations: 7.113 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 5.285 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005052/1.613, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.495 GB, free: 3.59 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002733/1.615, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 3.469 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00639/1.622, allocations: 0.6163 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 2.852 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007177/1.622, allocations: 173.6 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 2.68 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.000405/1.623, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.496 GB, free: 2.598 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01645/1.639, allocations: 7.332 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 11.28 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.61e-07/1.639, allocations: 0 / 1.504 GB, free: 11.28 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0179/1.657, allocations: 3.967 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 7.34 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002225/1.66, allocations: 0.5939 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 6.805 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02954/1.689, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.526 GB, free: 4.656 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.536e-06/1.689, allocations: 0 / 1.526 GB, free: 4.656 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005518/1.695, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 1.52 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0175/1.712, allocations: 2.945 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 14.64 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03529/1.748, allocations: 18.94 MB / 1.55 GB, free: 11.66 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008067/1.756, allocations: 5.381 MB / 1.555 GB, free: 6.242 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.015/1.771, allocations: 6.445 MB / 1.562 GB, free: 15.8 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00231/1.773, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.562 GB, free: 15.39 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.062e-06/1.773, allocations: 0 / 1.562 GB, free: 15.39 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.219/1.992, allocations: 143.5 MB / 1.702 GB, free: 1.07 MB / 1.264 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches