Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001062/0.001062, allocations: 104 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 148 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001062/0.001062, allocations: 196.1 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.617 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.307/1.307, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.215 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.545/2.545, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7104 GB, free: 4.996 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001275/0.001275, allocations: 71.88 kB / 0.8692 GB, free: 4.598 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.5823/0.5836, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.453 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03281/0.6165, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 2.57 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0197/0.6362, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.246 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002843/0.6391, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.191 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003952/0.6431, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.074 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00629/0.6495, allocations: 2.076 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00543/0.6549, allocations: 1.866 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02046/0.6754, allocations: 19.52 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01006/0.6855, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 6.285 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0114/0.6969, allocations: 6.424 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 15.86 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00914/0.7061, allocations: 5.496 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003023/0.7091, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 9.594 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009581/0.7187, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.363 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005724/0.7245, allocations: 2.922 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 3.434 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01177/0.7363, allocations: 4.753 MB / 1.114 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02245/0.7588, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.117e-06/0.7588, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.184e-06/0.7588, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005239/0.7594, allocations: 0 / 1.129 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03103/0.7904, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.688 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.714e-05/0.7905, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 3.68 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004641/0.7951, allocations: 0.8848 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 2.785 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02155/0.8167, allocations: 9.359 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.352 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003605/0.8171, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 9.027 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002112/0.8192, allocations: 483.7 kB / 1.151 GB, free: 8.555 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01371/0.8329, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.359 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001658/0.8331, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.344 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009625/0.8341, allocations: 144 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.203 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001148/0.8342, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.157 GB, free: 2.113 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009624/0.8439, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 13.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06421/0.9081, allocations: 33.91 MB / 1.195 GB, free: 9.777 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01225/0.9204, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 3.449 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003954/0.9244, allocations: 2.504 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 0.9453 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02585/0.9503, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 3.168 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003405/0.9537, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 1.004 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.873e-06/0.9537, allocations: 0 / 1.219 GB, free: 1.004 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03015/0.9839, allocations: 14 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 2.809 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.526e-05/0.984, allocations: 136.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 2.652 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02003/1.004, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.23 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001112/1.005, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.105 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004315/1.01, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.789 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001864/1.011, allocations: 0.8746 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.902 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00281/1.014, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.551e-05/1.014, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.379 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.5569/1.571, allocations: 3.446 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 208.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009623/1.581, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 205.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06178/1.643, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 190.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.000173/1.643, allocations: 24.69 kB / 1.293 GB, free: 190.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01736/1.66, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 182.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001439/1.661, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 182.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001453/1.661, allocations: 84 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 182.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001528/1.662, allocations: 0.7162 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 181.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004815/1.667, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 180.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008801/1.676, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 164.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01009/1.686, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 163.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001691/1.688, allocations: 280.1 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 163.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01038/1.698, allocations: 7.082 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 156.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00602/1.704, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 149 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04861/1.753, allocations: 36.58 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 111 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.647e-05/1.753, allocations: 24 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 111 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01544/1.768, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 101.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.065e-05/1.769, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 101.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001203/1.769, allocations: 84.88 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 101 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001466/1.77, allocations: 0.7083 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 100.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004962/1.775, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 98.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008754/1.784, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 83.37 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008752/1.793, allocations: 1.18 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 82.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001146/1.794, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 81.93 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0021/1.796, allocations: 0.7505 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 81.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002154/1.798, allocations: 0.6664 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 80.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009096/1.807, allocations: 5.151 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 75.72 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.376e-05/1.807, allocations: 31.94 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 75.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.212e-05/1.807, allocations: 4 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 75.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004909/1.812, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 71.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02484/1.837, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 58.13 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.058e-05/1.837, allocations: 4 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 58.12 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002339/1.839, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 57.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001236/1.841, allocations: 0.5824 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 56.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003306/1.841, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 56.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008605/1.85, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 41.42 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.636e-06/1.85, allocations: 4 kB / 1.436 GB, free: 41.42 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.00961/1.859, allocations: 7.123 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 34.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00402/1.863, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 32.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00201/1.865, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 32.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005072/1.87, allocations: 0.6195 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 31.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004056/1.871, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 31.62 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002225/1.871, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 31.54 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0125/1.884, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 24.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.41e-07/1.884, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 24.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01456/1.898, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 20.29 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.001745/1.9, allocations: 0.5986 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 19.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02292/1.923, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 1.613 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.126e-06/1.923, allocations: 0 / 1.475 GB, free: 1.613 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003979/1.927, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01427/1.941, allocations: 2.934 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 11.59 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03159/1.973, allocations: 18.95 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.656 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005954/1.979, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 3.254 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01434/1.993, allocations: 6.447 MB / 1.511 GB, free: 12.81 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002388/1.996, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.511 GB, free: 12.4 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.61e-07/1.996, allocations: 0 / 1.511 GB, free: 12.4 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2123/2.208, allocations: 143.5 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 14.31 MB / 1.186 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches