Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
"" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"})
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001127/0.001127, allocations: 108 kB / 15.6 MB, free: 132 kB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001166/0.001166, allocations: 194 kB / 16.53 MB, free: 6.391 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.328/1.328, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.2 MB, free: 4.395 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.657/2.657, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7346 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001399/0.001399, allocations: 73.38 kB / 0.8992 GB, free: 37.03 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2675/0.269, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.053 GB, free: 8.312 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03322/0.3022, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.43 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01712/0.3194, allocations: 12.28 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.12 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001935/0.3213, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003237/0.3247, allocations: 1.111 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005582/0.3303, allocations: 2.083 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 8.852 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005494/0.3358, allocations: 1.854 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 7.004 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01966/0.3554, allocations: 19.53 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 3.43 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00879/0.3643, allocations: 7.204 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 12.15 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009922/0.3742, allocations: 6.429 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 5.719 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008097/0.3823, allocations: 5.488 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 216 kB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002212/0.3846, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007285/0.3918, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 12.23 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.00394/0.3958, allocations: 2.922 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 9.305 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008149/0.404, allocations: 4.76 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 4.523 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01731/0.4213, allocations: 15.31 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 5.168 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.19e-06/0.4214, allocations: 0 / 1.165 GB, free: 5.168 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.633e-06/0.4214, allocations: 0 / 1.165 GB, free: 5.168 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003666/0.4217, allocations: 0 / 1.165 GB, free: 5.168 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02745/0.4492, allocations: 11.51 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.551 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.081e-05/0.4493, allocations: 12.62 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.539 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001406/0.4507, allocations: 496.3 kB / 1.177 GB, free: 9.043 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003111/0.4538, allocations: 0.8808 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 8.152 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01923/0.473, allocations: 9.352 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003109/0.4734, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.4 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.00151/0.4749, allocations: 487.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.92 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01164/0.4866, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.73 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001111/0.4867, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.715 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007377/0.4875, allocations: 144 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.574 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001053/0.4876, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.194 GB, free: 7.477 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008212/0.4958, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 2.703 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05322/0.549, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01178/0.5609, allocations: 6.229 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 8.816 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003853/0.5647, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 6.309 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.4601/1.025, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 170.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002917/1.028, allocations: 2.133 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 170.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 1.436e-05/1.028, allocations: 0 / 1.255 GB, free: 170.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02582/1.054, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.269 GB, free: 167.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 6.023e-05/1.054, allocations: 127.7 kB / 1.269 GB, free: 167.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01845/1.072, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 165.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008292/1.073, allocations: 120 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 165.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003349/1.076, allocations: 3.308 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 163 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001532/1.078, allocations: 0.868 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 162.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00189/1.08, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.284 GB, free: 161.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.194e-05/1.08, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.284 GB, free: 161.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004238/1.084, allocations: 3.448 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 160.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005311/1.089, allocations: 5.931 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 155.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04417/1.134, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 123.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 6.974e-05/1.134, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.329 GB, free: 123.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01401/1.148, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 112.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.341e-05/1.148, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 112.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.176e-05/1.148, allocations: 84.09 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 112.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001389/1.149, allocations: 0.7105 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 112 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004465/1.154, allocations: 1.479 MB / 1.342 GB, free: 110.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008464/1.162, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 95.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008673/1.171, allocations: 1.179 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.89 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009113/1.172, allocations: 275.8 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.62 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009099/1.181, allocations: 7.086 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 86.53 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005428/1.187, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 79.39 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04324/1.23, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 41.38 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 4.627e-05/1.23, allocations: 28 kB / 1.406 GB, free: 41.36 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01386/1.244, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.731e-05/1.244, allocations: 67.42 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 31.13 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.56e-05/1.244, allocations: 84 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 31.05 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001282/1.245, allocations: 0.7148 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 30.32 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004557/1.25, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 28.83 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008156/1.258, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 13.36 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008807/1.267, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001203/1.268, allocations: 280 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001344/1.269, allocations: 0.7571 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002236/1.272, allocations: 0.6634 MB / 1.435 GB, free: 10.47 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007274/1.279, allocations: 5.145 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 5.285 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.054e-05/1.279, allocations: 24 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 5.262 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.09e-05/1.279, allocations: 4 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 5.258 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004512/1.284, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 1.258 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02279/1.306, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.672 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.113e-05/1.306, allocations: 4 kB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.668 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002531/1.309, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.066 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001353/1.31, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.465 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000266/1.311, allocations: 136.6 kB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.332 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01117/1.322, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.977 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.698e-06/1.322, allocations: 4 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.973 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01186/1.334, allocations: 7.119 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 11.77 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004804/1.338, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 10.07 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002604/1.341, allocations: 123.8 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.953 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005836/1.347, allocations: 0.6198 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.332 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006142/1.348, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.482 GB, free: 9.164 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003655/1.348, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.482 GB, free: 9.082 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0141/1.362, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 1.758 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.11e-07/1.362, allocations: 0 / 1.489 GB, free: 1.758 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01535/1.377, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01301/1.39, allocations: 8.182 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 5.621 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02827/1.419, allocations: 17.99 MB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.488 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.868e-06/1.419, allocations: 4 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.484 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004623/1.423, allocations: 3.042 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 364 kB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01465/1.438, allocations: 2.935 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 13.48 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1368/1.575, allocations: 100.6 MB / 1.622 GB, free: 0.9883 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008098/1.583, allocations: 5.381 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 11.57 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01477/1.598, allocations: 6.442 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 5.141 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006026/1.604, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 2.16 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.01e-07/1.604, allocations: 0 / 1.637 GB, free: 2.16 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 4.076/5.68, allocations: 207.7 MB / 1.84 GB, free: 373 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 18.11/23.79, allocations: 12.31 kB / 1.84 GB, free: 373 MB / 1.295 GB
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)