Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001781/0.001781, allocations: 101.1 kB / 16.27 MB, free: 6.414 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00194/0.00194, allocations: 190.3 kB / 17.2 MB, free: 5.953 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.403/1.403, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.9 MB, free: 15.27 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.217/2.217, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6653 GB, free: 0.6992 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001286/0.001286, allocations: 60.89 kB / 0.8132 GB, free: 33.15 MB / 0.6231 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3074/0.3087, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9503 GB, free: 8.883 MB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.033/0.3418, allocations: 31.77 MB / 0.9813 GB, free: 8.996 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01835/0.3602, allocations: 12.3 MB / 0.9933 GB, free: 12.67 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002781/0.363, allocations: 67.62 kB / 0.9934 GB, free: 12.6 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003467/0.3665, allocations: 1.1 MB / 0.9944 GB, free: 11.5 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006498/0.3731, allocations: 2.08 MB / 0.9965 GB, free: 9.406 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005611/0.3787, allocations: 1.853 MB / 0.9983 GB, free: 7.562 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01927/0.398, allocations: 19.54 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 3.977 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01049/0.4086, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01334/0.422, allocations: 6.443 MB / 1.031 GB, free: 6.27 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01117/0.4332, allocations: 5.492 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 0.7578 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003377/0.4366, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.037 GB, free: 8 kB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01045/0.4471, allocations: 3.223 MB / 1.04 GB, free: 12.78 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005493/0.4526, allocations: 2.922 MB / 1.043 GB, free: 9.852 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01125/0.4639, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 5.074 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02147/0.4854, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.396e-06/0.4855, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.733e-06/0.4855, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004909/0.486, allocations: 0 / 1.062 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03832/0.5243, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.443e-05/0.5244, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.074 GB, free: 10.1 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005214/0.5296, allocations: 0.8843 MB / 1.074 GB, free: 9.207 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.6423/1.172, allocations: 9.341 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 115.2 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005374/1.173, allocations: 335.4 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 115.2 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002572/1.175, allocations: 480.6 kB / 1.084 GB, free: 115.2 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01571/1.191, allocations: 5.963 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 113.4 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000104/1.191, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 113.4 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0004781/1.191, allocations: 150.6 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 113.3 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001744/1.192, allocations: 101.7 kB / 1.09 GB, free: 113.3 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01226/1.204, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 111.8 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07262/1.277, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 91.55 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01317/1.29, allocations: 6.225 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 88.18 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004248/1.294, allocations: 2.505 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 86.98 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0256/1.32, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 77.76 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003058/1.323, allocations: 2.135 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 76.57 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.709e-06/1.323, allocations: 0 / 1.152 GB, free: 76.57 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02745/1.35, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.165 GB, free: 65.85 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.257e-05/1.35, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.166 GB, free: 65.7 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01856/1.369, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 55.29 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001173/1.37, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 55.16 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003885/1.374, allocations: 3.308 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 51.86 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001895/1.376, allocations: 0.8622 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 51 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.00195/1.378, allocations: 1.214 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 49.78 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 5.029e-05/1.378, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 49.48 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004163/1.382, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 46.01 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00506/1.387, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 38.88 MB / 0.8575 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04657/1.434, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.8008 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.642e-05/1.434, allocations: 24 kB / 1.226 GB, free: 0.7773 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01883/1.453, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.617 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001487/1.453, allocations: 69.89 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.00017/1.453, allocations: 88 kB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.457 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001956/1.455, allocations: 0.7121 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.727 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005037/1.46, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 4.246 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01269/1.473, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 4.754 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009713/1.483, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001345/1.484, allocations: 276 kB / 1.254 GB, free: 3.309 MB / 0.8887 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01331/1.497, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 12.21 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009052/1.507, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 5.07 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06882/1.575, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001153/1.576, allocations: 24 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02427/1.6, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 4.859 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000125/1.6, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.312 GB, free: 4.789 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001509/1.6, allocations: 87.61 kB / 1.313 GB, free: 4.707 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001825/1.602, allocations: 0.7168 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 3.969 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005511/1.608, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 2.488 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01266/1.62, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.008 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01086/1.631, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 1.832 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00207/1.633, allocations: 284 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 1.555 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003591/1.637, allocations: 0.7733 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 0.7695 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003778/1.641, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 104 kB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01234/1.653, allocations: 5.145 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.376e-05/1.653, allocations: 24 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.968e-05/1.653, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.337 GB, free: 10.89 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006566/1.66, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 6.898 MB / 0.9825 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02799/1.688, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 9.312 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.256e-05/1.688, allocations: 4 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 9.309 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00244/1.69, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 8.703 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001442/1.692, allocations: 0.5834 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.098 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003112/1.692, allocations: 132.5 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 7.969 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01221/1.704, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 8.605 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.302e-06/1.704, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.369 GB, free: 8.598 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01241/1.717, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 1.398 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005923/1.723, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002729/1.725, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 15.58 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006263/1.732, allocations: 0.6082 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 14.97 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005519/1.732, allocations: 170 kB / 1.378 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003211/1.733, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.379 GB, free: 14.72 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01893/1.751, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.386 GB, free: 7.398 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.11e-07/1.751, allocations: 0 / 1.386 GB, free: 7.398 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02531/1.777, allocations: 3.963 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 3.461 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003678/1.781, allocations: 0.5964 MB / 1.39 GB, free: 2.926 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03483/1.815, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 0.8086 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.225e-05/1.815, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.408 GB, free: 0.8047 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005414/1.821, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.411 GB, free: 13.68 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02084/1.842, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04356/1.885, allocations: 19.2 MB / 1.432 GB, free: 7.551 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01028/1.896, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 2.141 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003469/1.899, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 1.703 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.663e-06/1.899, allocations: 0 / 1.438 GB, free: 1.703 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.12/3.019, allocations: 477.6 MB / 1.904 GB, free: 21.76 MB / 1.154 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches