Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001541/0.001541, allocations: 106.6 kB / 16.27 MB, free: 6.406 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001699/0.001699, allocations: 195.2 kB / 17.2 MB, free: 5.973 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.395/1.395, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.9 MB, free: 15.26 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.668/2.668, allocations: 437 MB / 0.711 GB, free: 4.516 MB / 0.5762 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001593/0.001593, allocations: 76.78 kB / 0.8699 GB, free: 2.203 MB / 0.6387 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3616/0.3632, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 10.65 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03733/0.4006, allocations: 31.78 MB / 1.049 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01919/0.4198, allocations: 12.26 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002657/0.4225, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.39 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003635/0.4262, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 13.27 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006522/0.4328, allocations: 2.087 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 11.18 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005592/0.4384, allocations: 1.854 MB / 1.066 GB, free: 9.332 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.6875/1.126, allocations: 19.52 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01405/1.14, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.092 GB, free: 13.29 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01671/1.157, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.0142/1.171, allocations: 5.495 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004387/1.175, allocations: 0.7485 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01371/1.189, allocations: 3.228 MB / 1.108 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007807/1.197, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.29 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.02062/1.218, allocations: 4.743 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 8.406 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03113/1.249, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.812 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.064e-05/1.249, allocations: 3 kB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.812 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.404e-06/1.249, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.812 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000694/1.25, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.812 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04595/1.296, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.141 GB, free: 11.75 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.159e-05/1.296, allocations: 9.578 kB / 1.141 GB, free: 11.75 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007119/1.303, allocations: 0.8811 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 11.3 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02786/1.331, allocations: 9.355 MB / 1.151 GB, free: 5.875 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004491/1.331, allocations: 337.4 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.719 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003231/1.334, allocations: 480.9 kB / 1.152 GB, free: 5.555 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01828/1.353, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 500 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000199/1.353, allocations: 10.47 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 496 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001879/1.355, allocations: 148 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 348 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001547/1.355, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.158 GB, free: 256 kB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.012/1.367, allocations: 4.759 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 11.54 MB / 0.8731 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07542/1.443, allocations: 33.9 MB / 1.196 GB, free: 8.32 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.0139/1.456, allocations: 6.23 MB / 1.202 GB, free: 2.055 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005192/1.462, allocations: 2.509 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 15.54 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03524/1.497, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.217 GB, free: 1.824 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005407/1.502, allocations: 2.132 MB / 1.219 GB, free: 15.67 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 9.347e-06/1.502, allocations: 0 / 1.219 GB, free: 15.67 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04556/1.548, allocations: 14.03 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 1.492 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.915e-05/1.548, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.233 GB, free: 1.344 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02998/1.578, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 6.926 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001671/1.58, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.805 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.0074/1.587, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.504 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002954/1.59, allocations: 0.8655 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 2.645 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.006164/1.597, allocations: 1.208 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.43 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001313/1.597, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.129 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.008264/1.605, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 13.66 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01014/1.615, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.258 GB, free: 6.57 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07285/1.688, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 0.8281 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.978e-05/1.688, allocations: 26.69 kB / 1.294 GB, free: 0.8047 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02533/1.714, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 7.152 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001881/1.714, allocations: 73.77 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 7.074 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002181/1.714, allocations: 84 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 6.992 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00228/1.716, allocations: 0.7082 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 6.266 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006361/1.723, allocations: 1.477 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 4.879 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0129/1.736, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 5.457 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01193/1.748, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 4.273 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001893/1.75, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.322 GB, free: 4 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01623/1.766, allocations: 7.094 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 12.9 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009625/1.775, allocations: 5.934 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 5.766 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07205/1.848, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 15.78 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.299e-05/1.848, allocations: 24 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 15.75 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02387/1.872, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.602 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001357/1.872, allocations: 72.2 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001788/1.872, allocations: 91.92 kB / 1.38 GB, free: 5.438 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001951/1.874, allocations: 0.7052 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 4.711 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.007713/1.882, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 3.227 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01637/1.898, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 3.734 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01261/1.911, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.559 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002254/1.913, allocations: 272 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 2.293 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003945/1.917, allocations: 0.7729 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 1.52 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003737/1.921, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 0.8477 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01098/1.932, allocations: 5.138 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.452e-05/1.932, allocations: 24 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.66 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.385e-05/1.932, allocations: 12 kB / 1.404 GB, free: 11.65 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005591/1.937, allocations: 3.969 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02988/1.967, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.338e-05/1.967, allocations: 4 kB / 1.421 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002527/1.97, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 9.453 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001648/1.971, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.855 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003189/1.972, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.423 GB, free: 8.719 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01213/1.984, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 9.359 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 8.486e-06/1.984, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 9.352 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01305/1.997, allocations: 7.116 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.145 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006119/2.003, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 464 kB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002871/2.006, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 336 kB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006301/2.012, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.71 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004812/2.013, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.55 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002576/2.013, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 15.46 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01709/2.03, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 8.141 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.22e-07/2.03, allocations: 0 / 1.453 GB, free: 8.141 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02338/2.054, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 4.18 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003199/2.057, allocations: 0.6025 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.609 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.033/2.09, allocations: 17.96 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 1.465 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.089e-05/2.09, allocations: 0 / 1.475 GB, free: 1.465 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005273/2.095, allocations: 3.04 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14.33 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02269/2.118, allocations: 2.943 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 11.45 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04729/2.165, allocations: 19.19 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 8.223 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01204/2.178, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 2.805 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004276/2.182, allocations: 447.4 kB / 1.506 GB, free: 2.367 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 3.136e-06/2.182, allocations: 4 kB / 1.506 GB, free: 2.363 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.113/3.295, allocations: 477.7 MB / 1.972 GB, free: 34.57 MB / 1.248 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches