Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001333/0.001333, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001437/0.001437, allocations: 194.5 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.629 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.383/1.383, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.496 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.323/2.323, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6643 GB, free: 0.5547 MB / 0.5137 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00127/0.00127, allocations: 64.09 kB / 0.812 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 0.67 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6425/0.6438, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9491 GB, free: 9.25 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02791/0.6717, allocations: 31.52 MB / 0.9799 GB, free: 44 kB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01707/0.6888, allocations: 12.21 MB / 0.9918 GB, free: 6.152 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.0023/0.6912, allocations: 53.53 kB / 0.9919 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003037/0.6942, allocations: 1.01 MB / 0.9928 GB, free: 5.27 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005695/0.7, allocations: 1.944 MB / 0.9947 GB, free: 3.32 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005044/0.705, allocations: 1.697 MB / 0.9964 GB, free: 1.633 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01957/0.7246, allocations: 19.79 MB / 1.016 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008647/0.7333, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 6.535 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01117/0.7445, allocations: 6.633 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 15.9 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009453/0.7539, allocations: 5.742 MB / 1.035 GB, free: 10.14 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002711/0.7567, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.036 GB, free: 9.395 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008498/0.7652, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 6.16 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004865/0.7701, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.042 GB, free: 3.211 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01042/0.7805, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.046 GB, free: 14.44 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01915/0.7997, allocations: 15.31 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.52e-06/0.7997, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.061 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.603e-06/0.7997, allocations: 0 / 1.061 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004392/0.8002, allocations: 0 / 1.061 GB, free: 15.09 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03014/0.8303, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.072 GB, free: 3.484 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 6.746e-05/0.8304, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.072 GB, free: 3.477 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.009214/0.8397, allocations: 0.8805 MB / 1.073 GB, free: 2.586 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02747/0.8672, allocations: 9.43 MB / 1.082 GB, free: 9.078 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003699/0.8676, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.754 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001896/0.8695, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.083 GB, free: 8.281 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01351/0.883, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 2.082 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001505/0.8832, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.089 GB, free: 2.07 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001089/0.8843, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.089 GB, free: 1.922 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000142/0.8845, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.089 GB, free: 1.832 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009616/0.8941, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.094 GB, free: 13.05 MB / 0.8575 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06068/0.9548, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 9.625 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01241/0.9673, allocations: 6.215 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 3.305 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003911/0.9712, allocations: 2.517 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 0.7852 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02393/0.9952, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 3.039 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003124/0.9983, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 0.8789 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.05e-06/0.9984, allocations: 0 / 1.15 GB, free: 0.8789 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03027/1.029, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 2.68 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.385e-05/1.029, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.164 GB, free: 2.527 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01956/1.048, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 8.176 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009471/1.049, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.174 GB, free: 8.055 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004723/1.054, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 4.727 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002194/1.056, allocations: 0.8745 MB / 1.179 GB, free: 3.84 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004076/1.06, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.625 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001192/1.061, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.328 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005836/1.066, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.183 GB, free: 14.86 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007525/1.074, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 7.723 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06438/1.138, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.225 GB, free: 1.629 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.936e-05/1.138, allocations: 24 kB / 1.225 GB, free: 1.605 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02394/1.162, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 7.445 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001589/1.163, allocations: 81.62 kB / 1.235 GB, free: 7.359 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001921/1.163, allocations: 84 kB / 1.235 GB, free: 7.277 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002057/1.165, allocations: 0.7125 MB / 1.236 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006788/1.172, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 5.066 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01453/1.186, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 5.578 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01046/1.197, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 4.273 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001659/1.198, allocations: 283.9 kB / 1.253 GB, free: 3.996 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.5029/1.701, allocations: 7.083 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 271.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007687/1.709, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 268.6 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05227/1.761, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 251.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001539/1.762, allocations: 24.25 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 251.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01484/1.776, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.311 GB, free: 244.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.504e-05/1.777, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.311 GB, free: 244.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.171e-05/1.777, allocations: 84 kB / 1.311 GB, free: 244.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001282/1.778, allocations: 0.7163 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 243.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004557/1.782, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 242.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008331/1.791, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 226.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009459/1.8, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 225.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001198/1.802, allocations: 276 kB / 1.329 GB, free: 225.2 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001443/1.803, allocations: 0.7665 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002243/1.805, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 224.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007196/1.812, allocations: 5.15 MB / 1.336 GB, free: 219 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.127e-05/1.813, allocations: 24 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 219 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.007e-05/1.813, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.336 GB, free: 219 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004372/1.817, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 215 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0199/1.837, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 201.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.698e-06/1.837, allocations: 4 kB / 1.353 GB, free: 201.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002317/1.839, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.353 GB, free: 200.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001203/1.84, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002355/1.841, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.354 GB, free: 200.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008001/1.849, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 184.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 2.595e-06/1.849, allocations: 0 / 1.368 GB, free: 184.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009127/1.858, allocations: 7.126 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 178 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003904/1.862, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 176.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001763/1.864, allocations: 119.9 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 176.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005176/1.869, allocations: 0.7062 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004428/1.869, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0001989/1.869, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 175.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01086/1.88, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 168 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.41e-07/1.88, allocations: 0 / 1.385 GB, free: 168 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01444/1.895, allocations: 3.944 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 164.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002063/1.897, allocations: 0.6026 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 163.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02238/1.919, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.407 GB, free: 145.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.598e-06/1.919, allocations: 4 kB / 1.407 GB, free: 145.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003423/1.923, allocations: 3.042 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 142.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0125/1.935, allocations: 2.931 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 139.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.02437/1.96, allocations: 21.12 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 118.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004691/1.964, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 112.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01275/1.977, allocations: 6.479 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 106.4 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00205/1.979, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.445 GB, free: 106 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.343e-06/1.979, allocations: 0 / 1.445 GB, free: 106 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1832/2.162, allocations: 142.7 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 12.69 MB / 1.061 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches