Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001194/0.001194, allocations: 103.4 kB / 15.33 MB, free: 0.5078 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001239/0.001239, allocations: 194.8 kB / 16.25 MB, free: 6.621 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.214/1.214, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.9 MB, free: 4.527 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.509/2.509, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7344 GB, free: 15 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001218/0.001218, allocations: 62.73 kB / 0.8987 GB, free: 37.09 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2456/0.2469, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.052 GB, free: 8.68 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03066/0.2776, allocations: 31.54 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 9.027 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01721/0.2948, allocations: 12.21 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.79 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002225/0.2971, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.73 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003156/0.3002, allocations: 1.007 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 11.72 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005268/0.3056, allocations: 1.94 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 9.773 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004693/0.3103, allocations: 1.705 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 8.074 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01964/0.3299, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 4.25 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00912/0.3391, allocations: 7.189 MB / 1.126 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01097/0.3501, allocations: 6.637 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 6.344 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008306/0.3584, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 0.5898 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002438/0.3609, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 15.84 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007062/0.3679, allocations: 3.227 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003876/0.3718, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 9.664 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008018/0.3799, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 4.898 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01603/0.3959, allocations: 15.32 MB / 1.164 GB, free: 5.539 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.819e-06/0.3959, allocations: 0 / 1.164 GB, free: 5.539 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.593e-06/0.3959, allocations: 0 / 1.164 GB, free: 5.539 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003748/0.3963, allocations: 0 / 1.164 GB, free: 5.539 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02799/0.4243, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.93 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.659e-05/0.4244, allocations: 8.625 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.922 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.001532/0.4259, allocations: 0.4886 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 9.422 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003405/0.4293, allocations: 0.8808 MB / 1.177 GB, free: 8.531 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01936/0.4487, allocations: 9.419 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003151/0.4491, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001688/0.4508, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01188/0.4627, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 8.035 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001148/0.4628, allocations: 15.78 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 8.02 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0007795/0.4636, allocations: 144 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.879 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.798e-05/0.4637, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.789 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.007885/0.4716, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 3.012 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05256/0.5242, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01151/0.5357, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.237 GB, free: 9.242 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.003587/0.5393, allocations: 2.51 MB / 1.239 GB, free: 6.727 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.4309/0.9703, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 170.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.002837/0.9732, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.328e-06/0.9732, allocations: 0 / 1.254 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02649/0.9997, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 167.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 5.89e-05/0.9998, allocations: 128.6 kB / 1.268 GB, free: 167.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01689/1.017, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 166 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008122/1.018, allocations: 118.6 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 165.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.003168/1.021, allocations: 3.303 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 163.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001566/1.022, allocations: 0.8754 MB / 1.282 GB, free: 162.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002831/1.025, allocations: 1.211 MB / 1.284 GB, free: 162.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 3.964e-05/1.025, allocations: 302.3 kB / 1.284 GB, free: 162 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005641/1.031, allocations: 3.448 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 161.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006507/1.037, allocations: 5.942 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 156.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0449/1.082, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 123.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.522e-05/1.082, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.329 GB, free: 123.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01351/1.096, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 113.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.819e-05/1.096, allocations: 74.17 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 113.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.538e-05/1.096, allocations: 84 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 113.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001346/1.097, allocations: 0.7092 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 112.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004372/1.102, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.341 GB, free: 111 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008047/1.11, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 95.52 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008342/1.118, allocations: 1.303 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 94.21 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006266/1.119, allocations: 276 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.94 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008182/1.127, allocations: 7.087 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 86.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.004952/1.132, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 79.71 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04198/1.174, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 41.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.959e-05/1.174, allocations: 24 kB / 1.405 GB, free: 41.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0134/1.188, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.51 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.349e-05/1.188, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.44 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 8.444e-05/1.188, allocations: 87.89 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 31.36 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001326/1.189, allocations: 0.7165 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 30.62 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004348/1.193, allocations: 1.479 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 29.14 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008213/1.202, allocations: 14.5 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.68 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008197/1.21, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0006723/1.211, allocations: 272 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001384/1.212, allocations: 0.7722 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 11.33 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001884/1.214, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 10.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.006911/1.221, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.439 GB, free: 5.473 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.674e-05/1.221, allocations: 24 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 5.449 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.249e-05/1.221, allocations: 4 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 5.445 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004191/1.225, allocations: 3.97 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 1.445 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0223/1.247, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 3.891 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.088e-05/1.247, allocations: 8.062 kB / 1.456 GB, free: 3.883 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002292/1.25, allocations: 0.5929 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 3.289 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001213/1.251, allocations: 0.58 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.688 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002803/1.251, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.458 GB, free: 2.559 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01/1.261, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 3.195 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.148e-06/1.261, allocations: 4.031 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 3.191 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009799/1.271, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004068/1.275, allocations: 1.659 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001959/1.277, allocations: 119.9 kB / 1.48 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005106/1.282, allocations: 0.7056 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.477 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000408/1.283, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.32 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002176/1.283, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.238 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01249/1.295, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 1.961 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.3e-07/1.295, allocations: 0 / 1.488 GB, free: 1.961 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01435/1.31, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 14.04 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01218/1.322, allocations: 8.175 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 5.836 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02561/1.348, allocations: 17.98 MB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.703 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.021e-05/1.348, allocations: 4 kB / 1.518 GB, free: 3.699 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004138/1.352, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 0.5625 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01371/1.365, allocations: 2.931 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.3263/1.692, allocations: 101.7 MB / 1.623 GB, free: 100 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004902/1.697, allocations: 5.379 MB / 1.628 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01207/1.709, allocations: 6.461 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 4.227 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004233/1.713, allocations: 2.975 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 1.25 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.11e-07/1.713, allocations: 0 / 1.637 GB, free: 1.25 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 9.079/10.79, allocations: 206.7 MB / 1.839 GB, free: 373.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001842/10.79, allocations: 302.9 kB / 1.84 GB, free: 373.4 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 7.083/17.88, allocations: 7.516 kB / 1.84 GB, free: 373.4 MB / 1.295 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=86400 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)