Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00193/0.001931, allocations: 105.6 kB / 15.98 MB, free: 6.359 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.002464/0.002464, allocations: 196.8 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 6.191 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.398/1.398, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 13.74 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.565/2.565, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7107 GB, free: 4.723 MB / 0.5762 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00137/0.00137, allocations: 71.7 kB / 0.8694 GB, free: 2.57 MB / 0.6387 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3619/0.3633, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.04036/0.4037, allocations: 31.52 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 11.39 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02337/0.4272, allocations: 12.22 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 15.12 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002904/0.4301, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 15.07 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003572/0.4337, allocations: 1.007 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 14.06 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006552/0.4403, allocations: 1.942 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005489/0.4458, allocations: 1.696 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 10.43 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.6778/1.124, allocations: 19.77 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 14.51 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01336/1.137, allocations: 7.187 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.017/1.154, allocations: 6.631 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 13.18 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01385/1.168, allocations: 5.739 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 12.4 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.005248/1.173, allocations: 0.7449 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 12.4 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0143/1.188, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 12.38 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.00758/1.195, allocations: 2.936 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01768/1.213, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 9.066 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02232/1.235, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 5 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.068e-05/1.235, allocations: 0 / 1.127 GB, free: 5 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.476e-06/1.235, allocations: 1.062 kB / 1.127 GB, free: 5 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0007314/1.236, allocations: 0 / 1.127 GB, free: 5 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04764/1.284, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 13.94 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.886e-05/1.284, allocations: 13.8 kB / 1.138 GB, free: 13.93 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.007012/1.291, allocations: 0.8733 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 13.49 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02708/1.318, allocations: 9.427 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 8.02 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004626/1.319, allocations: 332.4 kB / 1.149 GB, free: 7.867 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003486/1.322, allocations: 486.3 kB / 1.149 GB, free: 7.703 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01958/1.342, allocations: 5.962 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.82 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000205/1.342, allocations: 13.25 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.812 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001793/1.344, allocations: 144 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.672 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001397/1.344, allocations: 90.62 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 3.586 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01189/1.356, allocations: 4.763 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 14.87 MB / 0.8731 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07944/1.435, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 11.76 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01424/1.45, allocations: 6.225 MB / 1.199 GB, free: 5.492 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.006084/1.456, allocations: 2.51 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 2.98 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03937/1.495, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.305 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004963/1.5, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 3.148 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 8.255e-06/1.5, allocations: 0 / 1.216 GB, free: 3.148 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04438/1.545, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.23 GB, free: 4.98 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.971e-05/1.545, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.23 GB, free: 4.832 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03256/1.577, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001698/1.579, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.24 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007664/1.587, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 7.062 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00318/1.59, allocations: 0.8682 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 6.199 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.006346/1.596, allocations: 1.213 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.977 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001333/1.596, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.246 GB, free: 4.68 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006782/1.603, allocations: 3.457 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.207 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009097/1.612, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07122/1.684, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 4.375 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.849e-05/1.684, allocations: 24 kB / 1.291 GB, free: 4.352 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02452/1.708, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.38 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001729/1.709, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.31 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002389/1.709, allocations: 84 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002029/1.711, allocations: 0.7091 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.496 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.008779/1.72, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 8.012 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01988/1.74, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 8.531 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01806/1.758, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 7.223 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002477/1.76, allocations: 276 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 6.953 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01921/1.779, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 15.86 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01059/1.79, allocations: 5.927 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 8.734 MB / 1.045 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07192/1.862, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 2.723 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.975e-05/1.862, allocations: 24 kB / 1.367 GB, free: 2.699 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02521/1.887, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 8.543 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001551/1.888, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 8.469 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001982/1.888, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 8.383 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002014/1.89, allocations: 0.7085 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 7.652 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006393/1.896, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 6.172 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01397/1.91, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 6.684 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01225/1.923, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 5.379 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001907/1.924, allocations: 280 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 1.107 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003194/1.928, allocations: 0.7651 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 4.336 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003667/1.931, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 3.668 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01249/1.944, allocations: 5.157 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 14.48 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.376e-05/1.944, allocations: 24 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.133e-05/1.944, allocations: 4 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 14.45 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006063/1.95, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 10.45 MB / 1.123 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03563/1.986, allocations: 13.37 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 12.9 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.485e-05/1.986, allocations: 8 kB / 1.419 GB, free: 12.89 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002571/1.988, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.419 GB, free: 12.29 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001669/1.99, allocations: 0.5717 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004034/1.99, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 11.56 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01218/2.003, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.42e-06/2.003, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.434 GB, free: 12.18 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01375/2.016, allocations: 7.12 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 4.973 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006929/2.023, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 3.289 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003459/2.027, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 3.168 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007889/2.035, allocations: 0.7015 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 2.465 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.001019/2.036, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 2.305 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003125/2.036, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 2.215 MB / 1.154 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01873/2.055, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 9.22e-07/2.055, allocations: 0 / 1.451 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02533/2.08, allocations: 3.949 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 6.992 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002955/2.083, allocations: 0.5933 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 6.43 MB / 1.17 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.03252/2.116, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 4.281 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.437e-05/2.116, allocations: 4 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 4.277 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005562/2.121, allocations: 3.036 MB / 1.476 GB, free: 1.148 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02164/2.143, allocations: 2.93 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14.27 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04408/2.187, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 8.855 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01018/2.198, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 3.449 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003932/2.202, allocations: 443.4 kB / 1.505 GB, free: 3.016 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.593e-06/2.202, allocations: 0 / 1.505 GB, free: 3.016 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.236/3.438, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.971 GB, free: 36.1 MB / 1.248 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches