Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001589/0.001589, allocations: 102.6 kB / 15.98 MB, free: 5.891 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001766/0.001766, allocations: 193 kB / 16.91 MB, free: 5.746 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.429/1.429, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.6 MB, free: 4.484 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.683/2.683, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7107 GB, free: 5.25 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001564/0.001564, allocations: 60.05 kB / 0.8694 GB, free: 5.035 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.791/0.7926, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.773 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03069/0.8233, allocations: 31.52 MB / 1.048 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01776/0.8411, allocations: 12.22 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.891 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002831/0.844, allocations: 55.69 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.836 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00333/0.8473, allocations: 1.015 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.816 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00594/0.8533, allocations: 1.937 MB / 1.063 GB, free: 3.875 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005119/0.8585, allocations: 1.698 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 2.184 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02175/0.8802, allocations: 19.78 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01119/0.8915, allocations: 7.185 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 7.094 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01457/0.9061, allocations: 6.639 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 468 kB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01102/0.9171, allocations: 5.734 MB / 1.103 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003578/0.9208, allocations: 0.7461 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 9.957 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009951/0.9307, allocations: 3.231 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.723 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005794/0.9366, allocations: 2.929 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 3.785 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01223/0.9488, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 15 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01863/0.9675, allocations: 12.85 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.875e-06/0.9675, allocations: 0 / 1.127 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.385e-06/0.9676, allocations: 0 / 1.127 GB, free: 2.137 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005814/0.9682, allocations: 4 kB / 1.127 GB, free: 2.133 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03813/1.006, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.138 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.759e-05/1.006, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.138 GB, free: 6.531 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005387/1.012, allocations: 0.8848 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 5.637 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02443/1.036, allocations: 9.43 MB / 1.148 GB, free: 12.13 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0005418/1.037, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.149 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.003152/1.04, allocations: 475.8 kB / 1.149 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01626/1.056, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 5.145 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001954/1.057, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 5.133 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001538/1.058, allocations: 148 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 4.988 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000138/1.058, allocations: 96 kB / 1.155 GB, free: 4.895 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01024/1.069, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 120 kB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06644/1.135, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 12.68 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01336/1.148, allocations: 6.226 MB / 1.199 GB, free: 6.348 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00499/1.153, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 3.84 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0301/1.184, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 6.098 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00447/1.188, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.134e-06/1.188, allocations: 0 / 1.216 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03819/1.226, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.23 GB, free: 5.73 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001053/1.226, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.23 GB, free: 5.578 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0257/1.252, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.24 GB, free: 11.23 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001344/1.254, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.24 GB, free: 11.11 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006264/1.26, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 7.781 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002447/1.262, allocations: 0.8745 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 6.895 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004905/1.267, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 5.676 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001223/1.267, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.246 GB, free: 5.375 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006274/1.274, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 1.906 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.7963/2.07, allocations: 5.925 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 204.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06454/2.135, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 190.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0002167/2.135, allocations: 23.06 kB / 1.291 GB, free: 190.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01981/2.155, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 183.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002617/2.155, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 183.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002397/2.155, allocations: 84 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 183.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001918/2.157, allocations: 0.709 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 182.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005613/2.163, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 181.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009427/2.172, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 165.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01044/2.183, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 164.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001596/2.184, allocations: 280 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 164.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0117/2.196, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.326 GB, free: 157 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00687/2.203, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 149.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.05529/2.258, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 111.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.82e-05/2.259, allocations: 24 kB / 1.367 GB, free: 111.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02021/2.279, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 102.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001377/2.279, allocations: 70.78 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 102 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001772/2.279, allocations: 88 kB / 1.377 GB, free: 101.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001687/2.281, allocations: 0.7091 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 101.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005387/2.286, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 99.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009301/2.296, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 84.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01057/2.306, allocations: 1.299 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 82.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001506/2.308, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 82.72 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003044/2.311, allocations: 0.7614 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 82.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003021/2.314, allocations: 0.6611 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 81.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01096/2.325, allocations: 5.152 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 76.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.076e-05/2.325, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 76.47 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.605e-05/2.325, allocations: 4 kB / 1.402 GB, free: 76.46 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00566/2.331, allocations: 3.966 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 72.47 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03007/2.361, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.418 GB, free: 58.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.753e-05/2.361, allocations: 4 kB / 1.418 GB, free: 58.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002585/2.363, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.419 GB, free: 58.31 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001482/2.365, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 57.71 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000564/2.365, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.42 GB, free: 57.58 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.009093/2.375, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.434 GB, free: 42.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.32e-06/2.375, allocations: 4 kB / 1.434 GB, free: 42.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01283/2.387, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 35 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005636/2.393, allocations: 1.655 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 33.32 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003113/2.396, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 33.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006828/2.403, allocations: 0.6881 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 32.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0008913/2.404, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 32.35 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005788/2.405, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.443 GB, free: 32.27 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01594/2.421, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 24.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.52e-07/2.421, allocations: 0 / 1.451 GB, free: 24.99 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01996/2.441, allocations: 3.941 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 21.08 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002795/2.443, allocations: 0.6067 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 20.55 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02706/2.471, allocations: 17.97 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 2.43 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.507e-05/2.471, allocations: 4 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 2.426 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.00563/2.476, allocations: 3.031 MB / 1.476 GB, free: 15.31 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02023/2.497, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 12.42 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04329/2.54, allocations: 21.37 MB / 1.499 GB, free: 7.074 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008705/2.549, allocations: 5.368 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 1.668 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003088/2.552, allocations: 455.3 kB / 1.505 GB, free: 1.223 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.503e-06/2.552, allocations: 0 / 1.505 GB, free: 1.223 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.176/3.728, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.971 GB, free: 188.3 MB / 1.232 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches