Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001605/0.001605, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6602 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001807/0.001807, allocations: 193 kB / 16.13 MB, free: 6.699 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.437/1.437, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.598 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.747/2.747, allocations: 461.9 MB / 0.7342 GB, free: 15.03 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001316/0.001316, allocations: 68.02 kB / 0.8984 GB, free: 37.31 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.304/0.3054, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.052 GB, free: 8.867 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03079/0.3362, allocations: 31.59 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 9.168 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01958/0.3558, allocations: 12.44 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002636/0.3585, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.65 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003548/0.3621, allocations: 0.976 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 11.67 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005672/0.3678, allocations: 1.921 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 9.742 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005225/0.373, allocations: 1.632 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 8.117 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02439/0.3974, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.121 GB, free: 1.621 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009763/0.4072, allocations: 5.566 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01005/0.4173, allocations: 5.096 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.863 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009557/0.4269, allocations: 5.055 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.789 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002303/0.4293, allocations: 312 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.484 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007535/0.4368, allocations: 2.7 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 14.78 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004172/0.441, allocations: 2.363 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008758/0.4498, allocations: 4.03 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 8.359 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02426/0.4741, allocations: 14.98 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 9.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.694e-06/0.4741, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 9.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.843e-06/0.4741, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 9.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000571/0.4747, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 9.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03508/0.5098, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.853e-05/0.5099, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004806/0.5147, allocations: 0.8771 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02239/0.5371, allocations: 9.422 MB / 1.182 GB, free: 3.34 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003614/0.5375, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.182 GB, free: 3.016 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001937/0.5395, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 2.547 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01397/0.5535, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.35 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001649/0.5537, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.33 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001106/0.5548, allocations: 144 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.19 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001177/0.5549, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.1 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01001/0.5649, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.328 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06381/0.6288, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 3.883 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01326/0.6421, allocations: 6.221 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005231/0.6474, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.6589/1.306, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004399/1.311, allocations: 2.136 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 170.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.392e-06/1.311, allocations: 0 / 1.25 GB, free: 170.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03889/1.35, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 167.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001047/1.35, allocations: 133.3 kB / 1.264 GB, free: 167.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.03067/1.38, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.274 GB, free: 167 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001195/1.382, allocations: 117 kB / 1.274 GB, free: 167 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005599/1.387, allocations: 3.309 MB / 1.277 GB, free: 164.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00218/1.39, allocations: 0.8742 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 163.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.004498/1.394, allocations: 1.203 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 163.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.657e-05/1.394, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.28 GB, free: 163.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006243/1.4, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 162.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.00733/1.408, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 158.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05406/1.462, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 127.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.777e-05/1.462, allocations: 28 kB / 1.324 GB, free: 127.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01873/1.481, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000123/1.481, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001392/1.481, allocations: 84 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001657/1.483, allocations: 0.7159 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 116.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005541/1.488, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 115.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009263/1.498, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 100.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01102/1.509, allocations: 1.294 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 99.63 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00136/1.51, allocations: 280 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 99.36 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01107/1.521, allocations: 7.082 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 92.26 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006174/1.527, allocations: 5.94 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 85.12 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0522/1.579, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 47.11 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.654e-05/1.58, allocations: 24 kB / 1.4 GB, free: 47.09 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01838/1.598, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.93 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001081/1.598, allocations: 70.42 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.85 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001366/1.598, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.77 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001661/1.6, allocations: 0.7124 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.04 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005424/1.605, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 34.55 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009015/1.614, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 20.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01052/1.625, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 18.94 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001334/1.626, allocations: 268 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 18.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002652/1.629, allocations: 0.766 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 17.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003058/1.632, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 17.23 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01008/1.642, allocations: 5.157 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.337e-05/1.642, allocations: 20 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.35e-05/1.642, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.01 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005255/1.647, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 8.031 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02966/1.677, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.47 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.501e-05/1.677, allocations: 4 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.47 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.00271/1.68, allocations: 0.6088 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 9.859 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00192/1.682, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 9.258 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0006321/1.683, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 9.125 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01252/1.695, allocations: 13.29 MB / 1.464 GB, free: 10.93 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.322e-06/1.695, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.464 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01329/1.708, allocations: 7.11 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.723 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005235/1.714, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 2.031 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002701/1.716, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 1.902 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006215/1.723, allocations: 0.6941 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 1.207 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006633/1.723, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003944/1.724, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 0.9609 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01657/1.74, allocations: 7.28 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.691 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.21e-07/1.74, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.688 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01973/1.76, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 5.762 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002444/1.762, allocations: 0.5855 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 5.238 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02443/1.787, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 7.66 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.544e-05/1.787, allocations: 4 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 7.656 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005753/1.793, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.52 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02042/1.813, allocations: 2.779 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 1.77 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04327/1.857, allocations: 21.11 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 12.64 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01118/1.868, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 7.227 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0188/1.887, allocations: 6.386 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 0.8555 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003485/1.89, allocations: 427.3 kB / 1.537 GB, free: 448 kB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.453e-06/1.89, allocations: 0 / 1.537 GB, free: 448 kB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2163/2.106, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.672 GB, free: 6.801 MB / 1.232 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches