Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.0.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001297/0.001297, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6406 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001451/0.001451, allocations: 196.7 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.711 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.406/1.406, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.535 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.1-master/package.mo): time 2.823/2.823, allocations: 461.8 MB / 0.7342 GB, free: 15.08 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00137/0.001371, allocations: 68.91 kB / 0.8984 GB, free: 37.32 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2963/0.2977, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.052 GB, free: 8.91 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03072/0.3285, allocations: 31.58 MB / 1.083 GB, free: 9.219 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02082/0.3493, allocations: 12.42 MB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002638/0.352, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.095 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003768/0.3558, allocations: 0.9721 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 11.73 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006015/0.3619, allocations: 1.92 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 9.809 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004958/0.3668, allocations: 1.636 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 8.18 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0233/0.3902, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.121 GB, free: 1.684 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009219/0.3994, allocations: 5.562 MB / 1.127 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01021/0.4097, allocations: 5.111 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.914 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.00946/0.4192, allocations: 5.047 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.848 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002341/0.4216, allocations: 316 kB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.539 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008232/0.4298, allocations: 2.696 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 14.84 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004331/0.4342, allocations: 2.363 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 12.47 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008668/0.4429, allocations: 4.03 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 8.418 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01904/0.462, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 9.406 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.515e-06/0.462, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 9.402 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.234e-06/0.462, allocations: 0 / 1.161 GB, free: 9.402 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005589/0.4626, allocations: 4 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 9.398 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.0313/0.4939, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.713e-05/0.494, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.172 GB, free: 13.79 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00402/0.498, allocations: 0.8732 MB / 1.173 GB, free: 12.9 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02128/0.5193, allocations: 9.426 MB / 1.182 GB, free: 3.398 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000365/0.5197, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.182 GB, free: 3.074 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001856/0.5216, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.183 GB, free: 2.605 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01316/0.5348, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000146/0.5349, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.4 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009838/0.5359, allocations: 148 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.25 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001127/0.5361, allocations: 99.92 kB / 1.189 GB, free: 12.16 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009148/0.5452, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.193 GB, free: 7.379 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05791/0.6032, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.226 GB, free: 3.938 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01235/0.6156, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004238/0.6198, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 11.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.6105/1.23, allocations: 13.19 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 170.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003317/1.234, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.65e-06/1.234, allocations: 0 / 1.25 GB, free: 170.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03488/1.269, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 167.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.119e-05/1.269, allocations: 137.5 kB / 1.264 GB, free: 167.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02457/1.293, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.274 GB, free: 167.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001093/1.295, allocations: 118.9 kB / 1.274 GB, free: 167.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004745/1.299, allocations: 3.304 MB / 1.277 GB, free: 164.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001904/1.301, allocations: 0.8702 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 164.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002384/1.304, allocations: 1.208 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 163.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.48e-05/1.304, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 163.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004829/1.308, allocations: 3.453 MB / 1.283 GB, free: 162.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005928/1.314, allocations: 5.937 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 158.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04594/1.36, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 127.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.384e-05/1.36, allocations: 24 kB / 1.324 GB, free: 127.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01604/1.377, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001084/1.377, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001387/1.377, allocations: 86.66 kB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001659/1.378, allocations: 0.7163 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 116.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.0047/1.383, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 115.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008488/1.392, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 101 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009486/1.401, allocations: 1.303 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 99.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00123/1.402, allocations: 272 kB / 1.351 GB, free: 99.43 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01042/1.413, allocations: 7.095 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 92.33 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.006016/1.419, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 85.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04955/1.469, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 47.18 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.868e-05/1.469, allocations: 24 kB / 1.4 GB, free: 47.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02025/1.489, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 37 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001125/1.489, allocations: 77.89 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.92 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001565/1.489, allocations: 84 kB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001592/1.491, allocations: 0.7165 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 36.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005072/1.496, allocations: 1.473 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 34.63 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.00833/1.504, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 20.31 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01012/1.514, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 19.01 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001351/1.516, allocations: 276 kB / 1.426 GB, free: 18.74 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.00248/1.518, allocations: 0.7655 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 17.97 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002963/1.521, allocations: 0.6632 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 17.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.00989/1.531, allocations: 5.149 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.858e-05/1.531, allocations: 24.89 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.227e-05/1.531, allocations: 11.62 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 12.08 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.005333/1.537, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 8.09 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02991/1.567, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.54 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.706e-05/1.567, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.53 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002896/1.57, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 9.926 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001705/1.571, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 9.324 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005785/1.572, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 9.191 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01198/1.584, allocations: 13.29 MB / 1.464 GB, free: 10.99 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.921e-06/1.584, allocations: 4 kB / 1.464 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01447/1.598, allocations: 7.11 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.789 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005785/1.604, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 2.098 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003128/1.607, allocations: 135.7 kB / 1.473 GB, free: 1.965 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006456/1.614, allocations: 0.6937 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 1.27 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007576/1.615, allocations: 157.8 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 1.113 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004688/1.615, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.474 GB, free: 1.031 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01678/1.632, allocations: 7.289 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 9.754 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.61e-07/1.632, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 9.754 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02174/1.654, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 5.828 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.00238/1.656, allocations: 0.5868 MB / 1.485 GB, free: 5.309 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0232/1.679, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 7.73 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.478e-05/1.679, allocations: 4 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005109/1.684, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.59 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01869/1.703, allocations: 2.786 MB / 1.504 GB, free: 1.836 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04368/1.747, allocations: 21.11 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 12.71 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009492/1.756, allocations: 5.377 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 7.297 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01718/1.774, allocations: 6.38 MB / 1.536 GB, free: 0.9258 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003153/1.777, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.537 GB, free: 0.5117 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 6.62e-07/1.777, allocations: 0 / 1.537 GB, free: 0.5117 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2289/2.006, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.672 GB, free: 6.848 MB / 1.232 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches