Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001744/0.001743, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6562 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001954/0.001954, allocations: 192.7 kB / 16.13 MB, free: 6.656 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.369/1.369, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.594 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.314/2.314, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6642 GB, free: 0.6055 MB / 0.5137 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001296/0.001296, allocations: 71.88 kB / 0.8119 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 0.67 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.6564/0.6577, allocations: 140.4 MB / 0.9489 GB, free: 9.273 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03534/0.6931, allocations: 31.57 MB / 0.9798 GB, free: 48 kB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02041/0.7136, allocations: 12.43 MB / 0.9919 GB, free: 5.977 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.00258/0.7162, allocations: 51.69 kB / 0.9919 GB, free: 5.926 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003566/0.7198, allocations: 0.9682 MB / 0.9929 GB, free: 4.953 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005929/0.7257, allocations: 1.936 MB / 0.9948 GB, free: 3.012 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005084/0.7308, allocations: 1.631 MB / 0.9964 GB, free: 1.391 MB / 0.7481 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02514/0.756, allocations: 22.46 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01073/0.7668, allocations: 5.562 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.242 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0112/0.778, allocations: 5.1 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 128 kB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009807/0.7879, allocations: 5.047 MB / 1.034 GB, free: 11.05 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002503/0.7904, allocations: 312 kB / 1.034 GB, free: 10.75 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008458/0.7989, allocations: 2.699 MB / 1.037 GB, free: 8.047 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004356/0.8033, allocations: 2.371 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.668 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009224/0.8125, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.043 GB, free: 1.621 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02119/0.8337, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.057 GB, free: 2.613 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 4.849e-06/0.8338, allocations: 0 / 1.057 GB, free: 2.613 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.623e-06/0.8338, allocations: 0 / 1.057 GB, free: 2.613 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005424/0.8343, allocations: 4 kB / 1.057 GB, free: 2.609 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03506/0.8694, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.069 GB, free: 7.012 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.722e-05/0.8695, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.069 GB, free: 7 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004418/0.8739, allocations: 0.8766 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 6.113 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02185/0.8958, allocations: 9.431 MB / 1.079 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003488/0.8962, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.079 GB, free: 12.29 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001774/0.8979, allocations: 491.6 kB / 1.08 GB, free: 11.8 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01321/0.9112, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 5.609 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001347/0.9113, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.085 GB, free: 5.598 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009618/0.9123, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.085 GB, free: 5.453 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001282/0.9124, allocations: 99.98 kB / 1.086 GB, free: 5.355 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009091/0.9215, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 0.5859 MB / 0.8419 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05906/0.9806, allocations: 33.77 MB / 1.123 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01339/0.994, allocations: 6.228 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 6.828 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004094/0.9982, allocations: 2.509 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 4.312 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02759/1.026, allocations: 13.21 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 6.562 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003575/1.029, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 4.41 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.933e-06/1.029, allocations: 0 / 1.147 GB, free: 4.41 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02975/1.059, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 6.211 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001045/1.059, allocations: 140.7 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 6.051 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02164/1.081, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 11.7 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001201/1.082, allocations: 125.6 kB / 1.171 GB, free: 11.57 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004572/1.087, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 8.246 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002118/1.089, allocations: 0.863 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.371 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002108/1.091, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 6.152 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.495e-05/1.091, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 5.852 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005111/1.096, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.379 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006539/1.103, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 0.9512 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05412/1.157, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.221 GB, free: 5.16 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.075e-05/1.157, allocations: 24 kB / 1.221 GB, free: 5.137 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01697/1.174, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.327e-05/1.174, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.231 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001271/1.174, allocations: 88.03 kB / 1.231 GB, free: 10.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001693/1.176, allocations: 0.7122 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 10.08 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00493/1.181, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.594 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01111/1.192, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 10.25 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009035/1.201, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 8.941 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001027/1.202, allocations: 276 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 8.672 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01063/1.213, allocations: 7.084 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 1.574 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.4609/1.674, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 268.5 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0574/1.731, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 254 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001446/1.731, allocations: 22.88 kB / 1.296 GB, free: 254 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01478/1.746, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 249.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.041e-05/1.746, allocations: 78.8 kB / 1.306 GB, free: 249.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.76e-05/1.746, allocations: 84 kB / 1.306 GB, free: 249 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00135/1.748, allocations: 0.7194 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 248.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004464/1.752, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 246.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.007809/1.76, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 232.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008342/1.768, allocations: 1.297 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 231.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0008255/1.769, allocations: 276 kB / 1.323 GB, free: 231.1 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001544/1.771, allocations: 0.7613 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 230.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00203/1.773, allocations: 0.664 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 230 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007827/1.781, allocations: 5.143 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.9 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.187e-05/1.781, allocations: 24 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.744e-05/1.781, allocations: 15.19 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 224.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004706/1.785, allocations: 3.956 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 220.9 MB / 1.014 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02261/1.808, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 207.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.748e-06/1.808, allocations: 2.516 kB / 1.347 GB, free: 207.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002352/1.811, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 206.7 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001206/1.812, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 206.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002803/1.812, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 206 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.007713/1.82, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 191.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.597e-06/1.82, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 191.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.009199/1.829, allocations: 7.111 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 185 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.003791/1.833, allocations: 1.657 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 183.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001775/1.835, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 183.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005109/1.84, allocations: 0.6952 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 182.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004237/1.84, allocations: 166.7 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 182.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002217/1.84, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.371 GB, free: 182.3 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01106/1.851, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 175 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.4e-07/1.851, allocations: 0 / 1.378 GB, free: 175 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01218/1.864, allocations: 3.948 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 171.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.001575/1.865, allocations: 0.6017 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 170.5 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01547/1.881, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 157 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 6.372e-06/1.881, allocations: 0 / 1.395 GB, free: 157 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003799/1.885, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 153.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01162/1.896, allocations: 2.784 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 151.1 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.02411/1.92, allocations: 21.12 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 130 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.004589/1.925, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 124.6 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01283/1.938, allocations: 6.39 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 118.2 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.001828/1.94, allocations: 427.3 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 117.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.182e-06/1.94, allocations: 0 / 1.433 GB, free: 117.8 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1709/2.111, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.569 GB, free: 12.32 MB / 1.045 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches