Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001702/0.001703, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6602 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001904/0.001904, allocations: 192.2 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.645 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.359/1.359, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.574 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.296/2.296, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6642 GB, free: 0.5703 MB / 0.5137 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001297/0.001297, allocations: 71.89 kB / 0.8119 GB, free: 14.85 MB / 0.67 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.68/0.6813, allocations: 140.3 MB / 0.9489 GB, free: 9.148 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02884/0.7102, allocations: 31.57 MB / 0.9797 GB, free: 15.92 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01828/0.7285, allocations: 12.43 MB / 0.9919 GB, free: 5.938 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002715/0.7313, allocations: 55.19 kB / 0.9919 GB, free: 5.906 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003285/0.7346, allocations: 0.9721 MB / 0.9929 GB, free: 4.93 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006232/0.7409, allocations: 1.92 MB / 0.9948 GB, free: 3.004 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004802/0.7457, allocations: 1.628 MB / 0.9964 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 0.7481 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02349/0.7692, allocations: 22.47 MB / 1.018 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009682/0.7789, allocations: 5.562 MB / 1.024 GB, free: 5.227 MB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009516/0.7885, allocations: 5.108 MB / 1.029 GB, free: 104 kB / 0.7794 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008316/0.7968, allocations: 5.039 MB / 1.034 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002007/0.7989, allocations: 312 kB / 1.034 GB, free: 10.74 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007585/0.8065, allocations: 2.7 MB / 1.037 GB, free: 8.031 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003829/0.8103, allocations: 2.375 MB / 1.039 GB, free: 5.648 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.007488/0.8178, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.043 GB, free: 1.602 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0163/0.8341, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.057 GB, free: 2.59 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 6.281e-06/0.8342, allocations: 0 / 1.057 GB, free: 2.59 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.663e-06/0.8342, allocations: 0 / 1.057 GB, free: 2.59 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.00034/0.8345, allocations: 0 / 1.057 GB, free: 2.59 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02844/0.863, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.069 GB, free: 6.988 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.325e-05/0.863, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.069 GB, free: 6.98 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003844/0.8669, allocations: 0.8805 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 6.09 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02047/0.8874, allocations: 9.429 MB / 1.079 GB, free: 12.59 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003261/0.8877, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.079 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001739/0.8895, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.08 GB, free: 11.79 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01211/0.9016, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.085 GB, free: 5.594 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.434e-05/0.9017, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.085 GB, free: 5.582 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0006358/0.9024, allocations: 151.9 kB / 1.085 GB, free: 5.434 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.558e-05/0.9025, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.086 GB, free: 5.34 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009065/0.9116, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.09 GB, free: 0.5664 MB / 0.8419 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06565/0.9772, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.123 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01289/0.9902, allocations: 6.218 MB / 1.129 GB, free: 6.809 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004259/0.9945, allocations: 2.51 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 4.293 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02733/1.022, allocations: 13.21 MB / 1.145 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003602/1.025, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 4.387 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.129e-06/1.025, allocations: 0 / 1.147 GB, free: 4.387 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0315/1.057, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.16 GB, free: 6.188 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.214e-05/1.057, allocations: 140.7 kB / 1.161 GB, free: 6.027 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02235/1.079, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009801/1.08, allocations: 113.7 kB / 1.171 GB, free: 11.56 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005132/1.086, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 8.23 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002131/1.088, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 7.348 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003608/1.091, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 6.137 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001022/1.092, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.176 GB, free: 5.836 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005698/1.097, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 2.367 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007669/1.105, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 11.23 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06318/1.168, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.221 GB, free: 5.145 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.135e-05/1.168, allocations: 28 kB / 1.221 GB, free: 5.117 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01967/1.188, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 10.96 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000108/1.188, allocations: 75.2 kB / 1.231 GB, free: 10.89 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.000119/1.188, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.231 GB, free: 10.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001683/1.19, allocations: 0.72 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 10.06 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005278/1.195, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.578 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01163/1.207, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00944/1.216, allocations: 1.31 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 8.922 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00125/1.218, allocations: 280 kB / 1.248 GB, free: 8.648 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0119/1.229, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.255 GB, free: 1.547 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.4888/1.718, allocations: 5.921 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 269.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06011/1.778, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0002043/1.779, allocations: 25.81 kB / 1.296 GB, free: 255.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01559/1.794, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 250.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.114e-05/1.794, allocations: 76.41 kB / 1.306 GB, free: 250.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001106/1.795, allocations: 85 kB / 1.306 GB, free: 250.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001483/1.796, allocations: 0.713 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 250.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004548/1.801, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 249 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008529/1.809, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.322 GB, free: 234.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008907/1.818, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 233.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001177/1.819, allocations: 272 kB / 1.323 GB, free: 233.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001752/1.821, allocations: 0.7589 MB / 1.324 GB, free: 232.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002206/1.823, allocations: 0.6617 MB / 1.325 GB, free: 232.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008068/1.831, allocations: 5.152 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 227.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.074e-05/1.831, allocations: 20 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 227 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.753e-05/1.831, allocations: 8 kB / 1.33 GB, free: 227 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004867/1.836, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 223 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02229/1.859, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 209.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 9.398e-06/1.859, allocations: 4 kB / 1.347 GB, free: 209.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002358/1.861, allocations: 0.6088 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 208.9 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001191/1.862, allocations: 0.5798 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 208.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003171/1.862, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 208.1 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008964/1.871, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 194 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.09e-06/1.871, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 194 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01092/1.882, allocations: 7.111 MB / 1.368 GB, free: 187.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004359/1.887, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 185.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002371/1.889, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 185.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005795/1.895, allocations: 0.6947 MB / 1.37 GB, free: 184.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004495/1.895, allocations: 164.2 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002406/1.896, allocations: 87.89 kB / 1.37 GB, free: 184.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01412/1.91, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.378 GB, free: 177.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.51e-07/1.91, allocations: 0 / 1.378 GB, free: 177.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01773/1.928, allocations: 3.955 MB / 1.381 GB, free: 173.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002199/1.93, allocations: 0.5966 MB / 1.382 GB, free: 172.7 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01827/1.948, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 159.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 8.646e-06/1.948, allocations: 4 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 159.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.003922/1.952, allocations: 3.053 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 156 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0164/1.969, allocations: 2.774 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 153.3 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03245/2.001, allocations: 21.13 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 132.2 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.006807/2.008, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 126.8 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01355/2.021, allocations: 6.38 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 120.4 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002484/2.024, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 120 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 8.81e-07/2.024, allocations: 7.875 kB / 1.433 GB, free: 120 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1788/2.203, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.569 GB, free: 14.49 MB / 1.045 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches