Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001569/0.001569, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6406 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001405/0.001405, allocations: 192.8 kB / 16.14 MB, free: 6.711 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.379/1.379, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.547 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.517/2.517, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7099 GB, free: 5.355 MB / 0.5606 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001207/0.001207, allocations: 59.91 kB / 0.8685 GB, free: 5.191 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.625/0.6262, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.017 GB, free: 2.797 MB / 0.7637 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03007/0.6563, allocations: 31.56 MB / 1.047 GB, free: 3.125 MB / 0.795 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.0172/0.6735, allocations: 12.45 MB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.645 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002145/0.6757, allocations: 59.62 kB / 1.06 GB, free: 6.586 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003035/0.6788, allocations: 0.9682 MB / 1.061 GB, free: 5.613 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.005418/0.6842, allocations: 1.921 MB / 1.062 GB, free: 3.684 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00466/0.6889, allocations: 1.63 MB / 1.064 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02438/0.7133, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.086 GB, free: 11.56 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008992/0.7223, allocations: 5.57 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 5.91 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01137/0.7337, allocations: 5.104 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 0.7891 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01049/0.7442, allocations: 5.031 MB / 1.101 GB, free: 11.74 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002676/0.747, allocations: 315.9 kB / 1.102 GB, free: 11.43 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.008136/0.7551, allocations: 2.704 MB / 1.104 GB, free: 8.723 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004307/0.7594, allocations: 2.371 MB / 1.107 GB, free: 6.344 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008041/0.7675, allocations: 4.022 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 2.301 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01669/0.7842, allocations: 14.98 MB / 1.125 GB, free: 3.281 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.411e-06/0.7843, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.281 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.573e-06/0.7843, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.281 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004397/0.7847, allocations: 0 / 1.125 GB, free: 3.281 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03118/0.8159, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.676 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.697e-05/0.816, allocations: 11.97 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 7.664 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004672/0.8207, allocations: 0.8809 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 6.773 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02466/0.8453, allocations: 9.418 MB / 1.146 GB, free: 13.28 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004313/0.8458, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.95 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002012/0.8479, allocations: 471.8 kB / 1.147 GB, free: 12.49 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01343/0.8613, allocations: 5.97 MB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.285 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001507/0.8615, allocations: 11.92 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.273 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001033/0.8625, allocations: 144 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000117/0.8627, allocations: 91.94 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 6.043 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009635/0.8723, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.158 GB, free: 1.27 MB / 0.9044 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06022/0.9326, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.191 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01279/0.9454, allocations: 6.236 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 7.477 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004387/0.9498, allocations: 2.502 MB / 1.199 GB, free: 4.973 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02644/0.9763, allocations: 13.21 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 7.227 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003785/0.9801, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 5.066 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.36e-06/0.9801, allocations: 0 / 1.214 GB, free: 5.066 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03015/1.01, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 6.863 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.697e-05/1.01, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 6.711 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02297/1.033, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.238 GB, free: 12.37 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001021/1.034, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.238 GB, free: 12.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005135/1.04, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 8.918 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002022/1.042, allocations: 0.8669 MB / 1.243 GB, free: 8.039 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003446/1.045, allocations: 1.205 MB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.824 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.452e-05/1.045, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.244 GB, free: 6.52 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006359/1.052, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.055 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.4849/1.537, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 203.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06246/1.599, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 190.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001587/1.599, allocations: 27.16 kB / 1.289 GB, free: 190.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.0176/1.617, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001896/1.617, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001813/1.617, allocations: 84 kB / 1.299 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001618/1.619, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 183.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005092/1.624, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 182.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008477/1.633, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 168.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00937/1.642, allocations: 1.301 MB / 1.315 GB, free: 166.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001332/1.643, allocations: 279 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 166.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009846/1.653, allocations: 7.091 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 159.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005811/1.659, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 152.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04896/1.708, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 114.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 5.393e-05/1.708, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 114.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01446/1.723, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.457e-05/1.723, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.503e-05/1.723, allocations: 88.12 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 104.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001379/1.724, allocations: 0.7083 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 103.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004664/1.729, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 102.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008206/1.737, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.389 GB, free: 87.82 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008579/1.746, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.55 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.0009956/1.747, allocations: 272.7 kB / 1.391 GB, free: 86.29 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002067/1.749, allocations: 0.7646 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.57 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002025/1.751, allocations: 0.6605 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 85.23 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.008/1.759, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.05 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 1.944e-05/1.759, allocations: 24 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.03 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.521e-05/1.759, allocations: 4 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 80.02 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004782/1.764, allocations: 3.969 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 76.03 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02136/1.785, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 62.48 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.294e-05/1.785, allocations: 8 kB / 1.414 GB, free: 62.47 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002363/1.787, allocations: 0.597 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 61.87 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00125/1.789, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 61.27 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002931/1.789, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 61.13 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008022/1.797, allocations: 13.27 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.93 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.578e-06/1.797, allocations: 4 kB / 1.429 GB, free: 46.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01112/1.808, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.436 GB, free: 39.71 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007078/1.815, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 38.03 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003838/1.819, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 37.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007125/1.826, allocations: 0.7037 MB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.21 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0008708/1.827, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 37.05 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005539/1.828, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.438 GB, free: 36.97 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01502/1.843, allocations: 7.288 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 29.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 1.4e-07/1.843, allocations: 0 / 1.445 GB, free: 29.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01539/1.858, allocations: 3.947 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 25.79 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002087/1.86, allocations: 0.5968 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 25.25 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01837/1.879, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.131e-05/1.879, allocations: 0 / 1.463 GB, free: 11.68 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004173/1.883, allocations: 3.048 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 8.539 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01567/1.899, allocations: 2.783 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 5.762 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03641/1.935, allocations: 21.11 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 0.6758 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008731/1.944, allocations: 5.372 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 11.27 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01595/1.96, allocations: 6.386 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.895 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002828/1.963, allocations: 423.4 kB / 1.501 GB, free: 4.48 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.242e-06/1.963, allocations: 0 / 1.501 GB, free: 4.48 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2179/2.181, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.636 GB, free: 10.99 MB / 1.17 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches