Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001072/0.001072, allocations: 111.3 kB / 15.23 MB, free: 0.6602 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001109/0.001108, allocations: 192.2 kB / 16.13 MB, free: 6.715 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.338/1.338, allocations: 222.9 MB / 239.8 MB, free: 4.629 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.766/2.766, allocations: 472.6 MB / 0.7447 GB, free: 4.965 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001246/0.001246, allocations: 72.14 kB / 0.9114 GB, free: 33.64 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2872/0.2885, allocations: 159.9 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 0.8262 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03017/0.3187, allocations: 31.58 MB / 1.098 GB, free: 11.25 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01713/0.3359, allocations: 12.43 MB / 1.11 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.001963/0.3379, allocations: 59.62 kB / 1.111 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.00287/0.3408, allocations: 0.9682 MB / 1.111 GB, free: 13.76 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.004928/0.3457, allocations: 1.921 MB / 1.113 GB, free: 11.83 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004303/0.35, allocations: 1.633 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 10.21 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02041/0.3705, allocations: 22.45 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 3.711 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.007509/0.378, allocations: 5.566 MB / 1.142 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.008863/0.3869, allocations: 5.104 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 8.945 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.008593/0.3955, allocations: 5.035 MB / 1.152 GB, free: 3.891 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.001825/0.3974, allocations: 319.9 kB / 1.153 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.007949/0.4054, allocations: 2.688 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 0.8867 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004388/0.4098, allocations: 2.379 MB / 1.157 GB, free: 14.5 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008838/0.4187, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 10.45 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01868/0.4374, allocations: 14.98 MB / 1.176 GB, free: 11.43 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.235e-06/0.4374, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.43 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.294e-06/0.4375, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.43 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005067/0.438, allocations: 0 / 1.176 GB, free: 11.43 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03322/0.4712, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.84 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.203e-05/0.4713, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 15.83 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004179/0.4755, allocations: 0.881 MB / 1.188 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02232/0.4978, allocations: 9.424 MB / 1.197 GB, free: 5.441 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003921/0.4982, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 5.113 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001946/0.5002, allocations: 487.7 kB / 1.198 GB, free: 4.637 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01307/0.5133, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.204 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001567/0.5135, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 14.42 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009276/0.5144, allocations: 144 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 14.28 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001113/0.5145, allocations: 95.92 kB / 1.204 GB, free: 14.19 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009097/0.5236, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.209 GB, free: 9.414 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06063/0.5843, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 5.973 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.5966/1.181, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 160.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004926/1.186, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 160.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02497/1.211, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 156 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003384/1.214, allocations: 2.135 MB / 1.265 GB, free: 155.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.187e-06/1.214, allocations: 0 / 1.265 GB, free: 155.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03161/1.246, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 149.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 7.697e-05/1.246, allocations: 129.2 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 149.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02493/1.271, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 146.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001139/1.272, allocations: 118.8 kB / 1.289 GB, free: 146.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00485/1.277, allocations: 3.302 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 143.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001815/1.279, allocations: 0.8768 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 142.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003663/1.283, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.295 GB, free: 142.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.409e-05/1.283, allocations: 306.1 kB / 1.295 GB, free: 141.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004922/1.288, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.298 GB, free: 140.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.005789/1.293, allocations: 5.929 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 135.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04811/1.342, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 102.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 9.08e-05/1.342, allocations: 24 kB / 1.34 GB, free: 102.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01554/1.357, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 92.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001019/1.357, allocations: 70.47 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 92.54 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001177/1.357, allocations: 84 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 92.46 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00154/1.359, allocations: 0.7091 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 91.73 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00484/1.364, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 90.24 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008272/1.372, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 75.92 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009195/1.381, allocations: 1.309 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 74.61 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001103/1.382, allocations: 280 kB / 1.367 GB, free: 74.34 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009936/1.392, allocations: 7.079 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 67.25 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005789/1.398, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 60.11 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04819/1.446, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 22.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.324e-05/1.447, allocations: 28 kB / 1.415 GB, free: 22.07 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0178/1.464, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001871/1.465, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.425 GB, free: 11.84 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001976/1.465, allocations: 86.5 kB / 1.425 GB, free: 11.76 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.00182/1.467, allocations: 0.7204 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005246/1.472, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.427 GB, free: 9.543 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.009422/1.481, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 11.22 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009952/1.491, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 9.918 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001387/1.493, allocations: 276 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 9.648 MB / 1.014 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002417/1.495, allocations: 0.7652 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 8.879 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002894/1.498, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 8.211 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01068/1.509, allocations: 5.158 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 3.023 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.017e-05/1.509, allocations: 20 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 3.004 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.591e-05/1.509, allocations: 8 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 2.996 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00623/1.515, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 15 MB / 1.029 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03066/1.546, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.465 GB, free: 1.441 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 2.21e-05/1.546, allocations: 4 kB / 1.465 GB, free: 1.438 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002761/1.549, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 0.8359 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001556/1.55, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.466 GB, free: 240 kB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004287/1.551, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.467 GB, free: 108 kB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01153/1.562, allocations: 13.3 MB / 1.48 GB, free: 1.895 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.661e-06/1.562, allocations: 4.469 kB / 1.48 GB, free: 1.891 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01345/1.576, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.486 GB, free: 10.68 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005627/1.581, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.488 GB, free: 9 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00285/1.584, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.488 GB, free: 8.875 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.00674/1.591, allocations: 0.6898 MB / 1.489 GB, free: 8.184 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0008437/1.592, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.489 GB, free: 8.016 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005079/1.592, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.489 GB, free: 7.93 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01655/1.609, allocations: 7.277 MB / 1.496 GB, free: 0.6641 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.2e-07/1.609, allocations: 0 / 1.496 GB, free: 0.6641 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01775/1.627, allocations: 3.952 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 12.74 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002379/1.629, allocations: 0.5917 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 12.22 MB / 1.076 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02381/1.653, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 14.64 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.148e-05/1.653, allocations: 4 kB / 1.514 GB, free: 14.63 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005361/1.658, allocations: 3.046 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.5 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01956/1.678, allocations: 2.794 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 8.73 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03946/1.717, allocations: 21.1 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 3.602 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008958/1.727, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 14.19 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01692/1.743, allocations: 6.386 MB / 1.552 GB, free: 7.816 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002778/1.746, allocations: 419.4 kB / 1.552 GB, free: 7.406 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.242e-06/1.746, allocations: 0 / 1.552 GB, free: 7.406 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2268/1.973, allocations: 138.7 MB / 1.687 GB, free: 13.73 MB / 1.264 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_1.6_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)