Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 11.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007994/0.007994, allocations: 101.6 kB / 15.88 MB, free: 5.867 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00185/0.00185, allocations: 191.4 kB / 16.79 MB, free: 5.809 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.424/1.424, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.5 MB, free: 4.551 MB / 190.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.869/2.869, allocations: 461.8 MB / 0.7348 GB, free: 14.15 MB / 0.5919 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001323/0.001323, allocations: 63.7 kB / 0.899 GB, free: 36.87 MB / 0.7169 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3855/0.3868, allocations: 157.4 MB / 1.053 GB, free: 8.25 MB / 0.8106 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03724/0.4241, allocations: 31.56 MB / 1.084 GB, free: 8.574 MB / 0.8419 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02047/0.4446, allocations: 12.43 MB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003177/0.4479, allocations: 51.69 kB / 1.096 GB, free: 12.06 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003887/0.4518, allocations: 0.976 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 11.08 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006754/0.4586, allocations: 1.928 MB / 1.099 GB, free: 9.145 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005652/0.4643, allocations: 1.631 MB / 1.1 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02507/0.4894, allocations: 22.44 MB / 1.122 GB, free: 1.023 MB / 0.8731 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01059/0.5, allocations: 5.57 MB / 1.128 GB, free: 11.38 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0114/0.5114, allocations: 5.104 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 6.254 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01064/0.5221, allocations: 5.043 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 1.191 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00305/0.5252, allocations: 312 kB / 1.138 GB, free: 0.8867 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01008/0.5353, allocations: 2.703 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 14.18 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005574/0.5409, allocations: 2.363 MB / 1.143 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01305/0.554, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.147 GB, free: 7.762 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0162/0.5703, allocations: 12.73 MB / 1.159 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.929e-06/0.5703, allocations: 0 / 1.159 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.645e-06/0.5703, allocations: 0 / 1.159 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004962/0.5708, allocations: 0 / 1.159 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03522/0.6061, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.17 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.609e-05/0.6062, allocations: 11.97 kB / 1.17 GB, free: 15.39 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00491/0.6111, allocations: 0.8809 MB / 1.171 GB, free: 14.5 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02291/0.634, allocations: 9.428 MB / 1.18 GB, free: 4.992 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003986/0.6345, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 4.664 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002089/0.6366, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.181 GB, free: 4.195 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.0148/0.6514, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.99 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001878/0.6516, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.98 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001223/0.6529, allocations: 144 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001428/0.653, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.187 GB, free: 13.75 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01003/0.6631, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.192 GB, free: 8.973 MB / 0.9512 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06405/0.7271, allocations: 33.79 MB / 1.225 GB, free: 5.531 MB / 0.9825 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01289/0.7401, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.231 GB, free: 15.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00456/0.7447, allocations: 2.506 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 12.69 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.7677/1.512, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 169.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003643/1.516, allocations: 2.138 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 169.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.418e-06/1.516, allocations: 0 / 1.248 GB, free: 169.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03492/1.551, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.262 GB, free: 166.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.022e-05/1.551, allocations: 136.6 kB / 1.262 GB, free: 166.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02818/1.579, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 166 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001413/1.581, allocations: 118.9 kB / 1.272 GB, free: 166 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004786/1.586, allocations: 3.302 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 163.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002234/1.588, allocations: 0.8739 MB / 1.276 GB, free: 163.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002396/1.59, allocations: 1.207 MB / 1.278 GB, free: 162.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 7.788e-05/1.59, allocations: 302.2 kB / 1.278 GB, free: 162.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005637/1.596, allocations: 3.454 MB / 1.281 GB, free: 161.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007135/1.603, allocations: 5.924 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 157.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.04751/1.651, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 129 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001581/1.651, allocations: 24 kB / 1.323 GB, free: 129 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01601/1.667, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 118.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.928e-05/1.667, allocations: 70.2 kB / 1.333 GB, free: 118.7 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001067/1.667, allocations: 84 kB / 1.333 GB, free: 118.6 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001447/1.669, allocations: 0.7182 MB / 1.334 GB, free: 117.9 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004413/1.673, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.335 GB, free: 116.4 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008309/1.681, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 102.1 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0105/1.692, allocations: 1.298 MB / 1.349 GB, free: 100.8 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001363/1.693, allocations: 276 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 100.5 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01191/1.705, allocations: 7.085 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 93.44 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.005785/1.711, allocations: 5.933 MB / 1.362 GB, free: 86.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04453/1.756, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 48.3 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.249e-05/1.756, allocations: 24 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 48.27 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0166/1.772, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 38.11 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 7.781e-05/1.772, allocations: 74.41 kB / 1.408 GB, free: 38.04 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001/1.773, allocations: 84 kB / 1.408 GB, free: 37.95 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001452/1.774, allocations: 0.7091 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 37.22 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004659/1.779, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.41 GB, free: 35.75 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008396/1.787, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 21.43 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01091/1.798, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 20.12 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001432/1.8, allocations: 276 kB / 1.425 GB, free: 19.85 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002734/1.802, allocations: 0.758 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 19.09 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003409/1.806, allocations: 0.6595 MB / 1.426 GB, free: 18.42 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.00847/1.814, allocations: 5.157 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.161e-05/1.814, allocations: 23.98 kB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.041e-05/1.814, allocations: 8 kB / 1.431 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004436/1.819, allocations: 3.959 MB / 1.435 GB, free: 9.203 MB / 0.9981 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02597/1.845, allocations: 13.38 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 11.66 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.927e-05/1.845, allocations: 4.344 kB / 1.448 GB, free: 11.65 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002451/1.847, allocations: 0.6123 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001492/1.849, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 10.44 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0002931/1.849, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.45 GB, free: 10.31 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01103/1.86, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.463 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.971e-06/1.86, allocations: 4 kB / 1.463 GB, free: 12.11 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.0144/1.875, allocations: 7.114 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 4.906 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006281/1.881, allocations: 1.659 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.223 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00327/1.884, allocations: 131.8 kB / 1.471 GB, free: 3.094 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007115/1.891, allocations: 0.6975 MB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.395 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006818/1.892, allocations: 161.8 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.234 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004239/1.892, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 2.152 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01845/1.911, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.82e-07/1.911, allocations: 4 kB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.87 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02196/1.933, allocations: 3.952 MB / 1.483 GB, free: 6.945 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002796/1.936, allocations: 0.6023 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 6.41 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02426/1.96, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.497 GB, free: 8.848 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.719e-05/1.96, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.497 GB, free: 8.844 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005599/1.966, allocations: 3.037 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 5.723 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02181/1.988, allocations: 2.776 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 2.98 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04437/2.032, allocations: 21.38 MB / 1.523 GB, free: 13.57 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009114/2.041, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 8.168 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003654/2.045, allocations: 443.4 kB / 1.529 GB, free: 7.738 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.092e-06/2.045, allocations: 0 / 1.529 GB, free: 7.738 MB / 1.092 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.211/3.255, allocations: 477.2 MB / 1.995 GB, free: 192.8 MB / 1.279 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches