Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001034/0.001033, allocations: 91.38 kB / 15.36 MB, free: 0.7383 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.008394/0.008394, allocations: 171.5 kB / 16.26 MB, free: 6.613 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.327/1.327, allocations: 223.3 MB / 240.3 MB, free: 5.355 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.578/2.578, allocations: 437.7 MB / 0.7121 GB, free: 6.969 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0005437/0.0005437, allocations: 12 kB / 0.8728 GB, free: 3.32 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.666/0.6665, allocations: 153.8 MB / 1.023 GB, free: 15.87 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.0338/0.7004, allocations: 30.8 MB / 1.053 GB, free: 0.9609 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01856/0.719, allocations: 12.27 MB / 1.065 GB, free: 4.656 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002456/0.7215, allocations: 47.69 kB / 1.065 GB, free: 4.609 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003405/0.7249, allocations: 0.9721 MB / 1.066 GB, free: 3.633 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006329/0.7313, allocations: 1.921 MB / 1.068 GB, free: 1.703 MB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004978/0.7363, allocations: 1.63 MB / 1.07 GB, free: 84 kB / 0.8106 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02588/0.7622, allocations: 22.44 MB / 1.091 GB, free: 9.594 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.008948/0.7712, allocations: 5.481 MB / 1.097 GB, free: 4.047 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01018/0.7814, allocations: 4.979 MB / 1.102 GB, free: 15.05 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009366/0.7908, allocations: 4.91 MB / 1.106 GB, free: 10.12 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002177/0.793, allocations: 268 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 9.859 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009115/0.8022, allocations: 2.653 MB / 1.109 GB, free: 7.203 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.004498/0.8067, allocations: 2.297 MB / 1.112 GB, free: 4.898 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.008379/0.8152, allocations: 3.965 MB / 1.115 GB, free: 0.9062 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.01946/0.8347, allocations: 14.66 MB / 1.13 GB, free: 2.199 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.39e-06/0.8347, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.199 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 3.125e-06/0.8347, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.199 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0003874/0.8351, allocations: 0 / 1.13 GB, free: 2.199 MB / 0.8731 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02496/0.8601, allocations: 9.927 MB / 1.139 GB, free: 8.168 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.216e-05/0.8602, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.139 GB, free: 8.16 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004506/0.8647, allocations: 0.881 MB / 1.14 GB, free: 7.27 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.0218/0.8865, allocations: 9.447 MB / 1.15 GB, free: 13.75 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003904/0.8869, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.15 GB, free: 13.42 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001583/0.8885, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.15 GB, free: 12.95 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01355/0.9021, allocations: 5.968 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 6.738 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.000146/0.9023, allocations: 15.78 kB / 1.156 GB, free: 6.723 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009032/0.9032, allocations: 152 kB / 1.156 GB, free: 6.574 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001184/0.9033, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.156 GB, free: 6.484 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009321/0.9126, allocations: 4.778 MB / 1.161 GB, free: 1.695 MB / 0.9044 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05705/0.9697, allocations: 34 MB / 1.194 GB, free: 14.05 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01257/0.9823, allocations: 6.236 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 7.703 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004285/0.9867, allocations: 2.521 MB / 1.203 GB, free: 5.18 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02499/1.012, allocations: 13.28 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 7.359 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003645/1.015, allocations: 2.149 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 5.191 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.508e-06/1.015, allocations: 0 / 1.218 GB, free: 5.191 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.02913/1.045, allocations: 14.05 MB / 1.232 GB, free: 6.938 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.637e-05/1.045, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.232 GB, free: 6.785 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.01951/1.064, allocations: 10.35 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 12.44 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0007986/1.065, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.242 GB, free: 12.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004306/1.069, allocations: 3.305 MB / 1.245 GB, free: 8.992 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.001689/1.071, allocations: 0.8708 MB / 1.246 GB, free: 8.109 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.001309/1.072, allocations: 0.58 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 7.523 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.742e-05/1.072, allocations: 309 kB / 1.247 GB, free: 7.219 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005437/1.078, allocations: 3.433 MB / 1.25 GB, free: 3.777 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.5255/1.603, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 202.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06126/1.665, allocations: 36.72 MB / 1.292 GB, free: 190.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001964/1.665, allocations: 22.69 kB / 1.292 GB, free: 190.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01705/1.682, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 185.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.001506/1.684, allocations: 2.618 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 181.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001695/1.684, allocations: 84 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 181.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001499/1.685, allocations: 0.7161 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 180.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.004889/1.69, allocations: 1.483 MB / 1.307 GB, free: 179.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008296/1.699, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 164.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009328/1.708, allocations: 1.318 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 163.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001114/1.709, allocations: 276 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 163.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.789e-06/1.709, allocations: 4 kB / 1.321 GB, free: 163.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt replaceHomotopyWithSimplified (initialization): time 0.01517/1.724, allocations: 9.468 MB / 1.33 GB, free: 153.9 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002686/1.725, allocations: 84 kB / 1.331 GB, free: 153.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001687/1.726, allocations: 0.7142 MB / 1.331 GB, free: 153 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005358/1.732, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.333 GB, free: 151.6 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008242/1.74, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 137.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.008723/1.749, allocations: 1.309 MB / 1.347 GB, free: 136 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001027/1.75, allocations: 272 kB / 1.347 GB, free: 135.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization sytem: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.005613/1.755, allocations: 4.028 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 131.8 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.001751/1.757, allocations: 0.6684 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 131.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.007847/1.765, allocations: 5.159 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 126.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.184e-05/1.765, allocations: 24 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 126.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.472e-05/1.765, allocations: 4 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 126.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004969/1.77, allocations: 3.974 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 122.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.0226/1.793, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 108.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.201e-05/1.793, allocations: 0 / 1.374 GB, free: 108.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002519/1.795, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 108.1 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001263/1.796, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 107.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003078/1.797, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 107.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.008355/1.805, allocations: 13.3 MB / 1.388 GB, free: 93.17 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 3.497e-06/1.805, allocations: 7.984 kB / 1.388 GB, free: 93.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01188/1.817, allocations: 7.132 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 86.19 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004923/1.822, allocations: 1.703 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 84.46 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.001925/1.824, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.397 GB, free: 84.34 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005428/1.829, allocations: 0.7024 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 83.64 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0004443/1.83, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 83.48 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002279/1.83, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.398 GB, free: 83.4 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01151/1.842, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 76.13 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.1e-07/1.842, allocations: 0 / 1.405 GB, free: 76.13 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01336/1.855, allocations: 3.942 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 72.22 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.001788/1.857, allocations: 0.5952 MB / 1.409 GB, free: 71.7 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0182/1.875, allocations: 13.22 MB / 1.422 GB, free: 58.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.864e-05/1.875, allocations: 4 kB / 1.422 GB, free: 58.3 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004457/1.88, allocations: 3.051 MB / 1.425 GB, free: 55.16 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02033/1.9, allocations: 2.788 MB / 1.428 GB, free: 52.39 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.02929/1.929, allocations: 21.75 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 30.59 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007077/1.936, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 25.2 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01498/1.951, allocations: 6.381 MB / 1.461 GB, free: 18.82 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002763/1.954, allocations: 423.3 kB / 1.461 GB, free: 18.41 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.072e-06/1.954, allocations: 0 / 1.461 GB, free: 18.41 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2058/2.16, allocations: 135.9 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 11.69 MB / 1.123 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches