Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.1-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.1-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001025/0.001025, allocations: 86.72 kB / 15.06 MB, free: 1.09 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001329/0.001329, allocations: 168.7 kB / 15.95 MB, free: 204 kB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.414/1.414, allocations: 223.2 MB / 240 MB, free: 5.438 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.1-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.397/2.397, allocations: 390.4 MB / 0.6655 GB, free: 2.934 MB / 0.5137 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.0003379/0.000338, allocations: 12 kB / 0.8149 GB, free: 14.16 MB / 0.67 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.7028/0.7031, allocations: 142.3 MB / 0.9538 GB, free: 8.125 MB / 0.7169 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic): time 0.9079/1.611, allocations: 328.5 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 67.83 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.08886/1.7, allocations: 68.65 MB / 1.342 GB, free: 66.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.02062/1.721, allocations: 365.2 kB / 1.342 GB, free: 66.73 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.01577/1.736, allocations: 3.62 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 66.67 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.03381/1.77, allocations: 10.76 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 65.66 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.02345/1.794, allocations: 7.295 MB / 1.363 GB, free: 65.21 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.04579/1.84, allocations: 41.64 MB / 1.404 GB, free: 50.64 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.02129/1.861, allocations: 16.06 MB / 1.42 GB, free: 35.19 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.02707/1.888, allocations: 13.82 MB / 1.433 GB, free: 21.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.02486/1.913, allocations: 14.69 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 8.324 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.007162/1.92, allocations: 1.078 MB / 1.448 GB, free: 7.246 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01873/1.939, allocations: 3.619 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 3.719 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.008194/1.947, allocations: 4.799 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009042/1.956, allocations: 3.239 MB / 1.46 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03332/1.99, allocations: 21.95 MB / 1.481 GB, free: 6.836 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.756e-06/1.99, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 6.836 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.685e-06/1.99, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 6.836 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.001033/1.991, allocations: 0 / 1.481 GB, free: 6.836 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 2029 * Number of variables: 2029 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04968/2.04, allocations: 20.38 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 2.523 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.561e-05/2.04, allocations: 12.03 kB / 1.501 GB, free: 2.512 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.004628/2.045, allocations: 1.04 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 1.469 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.01282/2.058, allocations: 2.644 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 14.8 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.03691/2.095, allocations: 17.29 MB / 1.522 GB, free: 13.83 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0008105/2.096, allocations: 0.697 MB / 1.522 GB, free: 13.14 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.004392/2.1, allocations: 0.9457 MB / 1.523 GB, free: 12.2 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.03635/2.136, allocations: 16.66 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001726/2.137, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.54 GB, free: 11.34 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001386/2.138, allocations: 324.1 kB / 1.54 GB, free: 11.03 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0003308/2.138, allocations: 363.3 kB / 1.54 GB, free: 10.67 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.03539/2.174, allocations: 21.2 MB / 1.561 GB, free: 5.453 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.1402/2.314, allocations: 82.25 MB / 1.641 GB, free: 0.7578 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.02437/2.338, allocations: 13.22 MB / 1.654 GB, free: 3.531 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.01673/2.355, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.664 GB, free: 9.43 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.08135/2.437, allocations: 36.71 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 4.398 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.01808/2.455, allocations: 10.04 MB / 1.71 GB, free: 10.29 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyInStream (simulation): time 0.02858/2.483, allocations: 9.95 MB / 1.719 GB, free: 484 kB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=600): time 3.49e-05/2.483, allocations: 0 / 1.719 GB, free: 484 kB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=916): time 2.077/4.56, allocations: 313 MB / 2.025 GB, free: 234 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The linear system: 1 : valNorth2[7].dp = valNorth2[2].port_a.p - valNorth2[7].port_b.p 2 : valNorth2[5].dp = valNorth2[2].port_a.p - valNorth2[5].port_b.p 3 : tabsNorth2[5].dp = valNorth2[5].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 4 : tabsNorth2[7].dp = valNorth2[7].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valNorth2[7].port_b.p ; tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ; valNorth2[5].port_b.p ; valNorth2[2].port_a.p ] = [ -valNorth2[7].dp ; -valNorth2[5].dp ; -tabsNorth2[5].dp ; -tabsNorth2[7].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valNorth2[2].port_a.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ] = [ tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valNorth2[7].dp = valNorth2[2].port_a.p - valNorth2[7].port_b.p 2 : tabsNorth2[7].dp = valNorth2[7].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 3 : tabsNorth2[5].dp = valNorth2[5].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 4 : valNorth2[5].dp = valNorth2[2].port_a.p - valNorth2[5].port_b.p [ -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ; -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valNorth2[2].port_a.p ; valNorth2[5].port_b.p ; tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ; valNorth2[7].port_b.p ] = [ -valNorth2[7].dp ; -tabsNorth2[7].dp ; -tabsNorth2[5].dp ; -valNorth2[5].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valNorth2[7].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 2 : valCoo.m_flow + spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[2].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + (-spl1.res1.m_flow) - valCoo.m_flow - valNorth.res3.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 2 : tabsNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 3 : tabsNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.5.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 4 : valNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth2.5.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 [ -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ; -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; valNorth2.5.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ -valNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; -tabsNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; -tabsNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; -valNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 2 : valNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth2.5.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 3 : tabsNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.5.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 4 : tabsNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valNorth2.7.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; valNorth2.5.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ -valNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; -valNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; -tabsNorth2.5.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; -tabsNorth2.7.dp.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valNorth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ] = [ tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 + (-spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0) - valCoo.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 ; pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac0 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac0.dummyVarStateSetJac0 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.1087/4.669, allocations: 59.02 MB / 2.083 GB, free: 173.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02582/4.695, allocations: 17.38 MB / 2.1 GB, free: 156.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.003757/4.699, allocations: 242.6 kB / 2.1 GB, free: 155.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006011/4.705, allocations: 7.225 MB / 2.107 GB, free: 149.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.01117/4.716, allocations: 3.284 MB / 2.11 GB, free: 145.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003198/4.719, allocations: 208 kB / 2.11 GB, free: 145.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0004847/4.719, allocations: 0.7413 MB / 2.111 GB, free: 144.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03173/4.751, allocations: 23.76 MB / 2.134 GB, free: 121.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.03438/4.786, allocations: 26.55 MB / 2.16 GB, free: 93.46 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.03423/4.82, allocations: 25.04 MB / 2.185 GB, free: 68.37 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.004e-05/4.82, allocations: 12 kB / 2.185 GB, free: 68.36 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=1408) (initialization): time 1.534/6.354, allocations: 156.2 MB / 2.337 GB, free: 429 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0008615/6.355, allocations: 1.568 MB / 2.339 GB, free: 427 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 9.346e-05/6.355, allocations: 48.41 kB / 2.339 GB, free: 427 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.5665/6.921, allocations: 150.6 MB / 2.486 GB, free: 284.3 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01684/6.938, allocations: 3.382 MB / 2.489 GB, free: 280.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1604/7.099, allocations: 83.83 MB / 2.571 GB, free: 197 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.1708/7.27, allocations: 10.92 MB / 2.582 GB, free: 186.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.008616/7.278, allocations: 1.641 MB / 2.583 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 1.476e-05/7.278, allocations: 0 / 2.583 GB, free: 184.5 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt replaceHomotopyWithSimplified (initialization): time 0.5773/7.856, allocations: 154.4 MB / 2.734 GB, free: 29.83 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001521/7.856, allocations: 48 kB / 2.734 GB, free: 29.79 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 1.183/9.039, allocations: 149.7 MB / 2.88 GB, free: 388 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.01572/9.055, allocations: 3.337 MB / 2.884 GB, free: 384.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.1606/9.215, allocations: 90.09 MB / 2.972 GB, free: 295 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.1683/9.384, allocations: 10.91 MB / 2.982 GB, free: 284.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.007786/9.391, allocations: 1.605 MB / 2.984 GB, free: 282.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 207 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 10 ($whenCondition1,$whenCondition2,stepPump.y,$PRE.stepPump.pulseStart,stepPump.pulseStart,pumpHea.stage,$PRE.stepValve.T_start,stepValve.T_start,$PRE.stepValve.count,stepValve.count) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (952): * Single equations (assignments): 934 * Array equations: 6 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (linear and non-linear blocks): 8 * Torn equation systems: 3 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Equation system details: * Constant Jacobian: 0 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 * Non-linear Jacobian: 8 {1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1} * Without analytic Jacobian: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems: 1 {(28,89.3%) 28} * Non-linear torn systems: 2 {33 119,33 119} Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.01619/9.408, allocations: 4.001 MB / 2.988 GB, free: 278.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.008961/9.417, allocations: 1.495 MB / 2.989 GB, free: 277.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.2211/9.638, allocations: 71.09 MB / 3.059 GB, free: 206.9 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.2272/9.865, allocations: 85.47 MB / 3.142 GB, free: 121.3 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 0.0002355/9.865, allocations: 28 kB / 3.142 GB, free: 121.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.2111/10.08, allocations: 84.33 MB / 3.224 GB, free: 36.71 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.9887/11.07, allocations: 210.7 MB / 3.43 GB, free: 330.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 0.0001293/11.07, allocations: 0 / 3.43 GB, free: 330.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.01139/11.08, allocations: 2.097 MB / 3.432 GB, free: 328.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.508/11.58, allocations: 148.9 MB / 3.578 GB, free: 180.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.004886/11.59, allocations: 0.8181 MB / 3.579 GB, free: 180 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.2012/11.79, allocations: 122.2 MB / 3.698 GB, free: 57.55 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2[6].dp = valSouth2[6].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 2 : tabsSouth2[2].dp = valSouth2[2].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 3 : valSouth2[2].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[2].port_b.p 4 : valSouth2[6].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[6].port_b.p [ -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ valSouth2[6].port_b.p ; valSouth2[2].port_a.p ; valSouth2[2].port_b.p ; tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ] = [ -tabsSouth2[6].dp ; -tabsSouth2[2].dp ; -valSouth2[2].dp ; -valSouth2[6].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 2 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ; tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[2].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2[2].dp = valSouth2[2].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p 2 : valSouth2[2].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[2].port_b.p 3 : valSouth2[6].dp = valSouth2[2].port_a.p - valSouth2[6].port_b.p 4 : tabsSouth2[6].dp = valSouth2[6].port_b.p - tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[1].port_b.p ; valSouth2[6].port_b.p ; valSouth2[2].port_a.p ; valSouth2[2].port_b.p ] = [ -tabsSouth2[2].dp ; -valSouth2[2].dp ; -valSouth2[6].dp ; -tabsSouth2[6].dp ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2[2].port_b.p since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : spl1.res1.m_flow + valNorth.res3.m_flow + valSouth.res3.m_flow + (-tabsNorth2[7].m_flow) - $cse422 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow - tabsNorth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow - tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - tabsSouth1[2].m_flow = 0.0 2 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth1[2].m_flow + tabsSouth1[1].m_flow - pipSouth1.m_flow = 0.0 [ -1.0 , -1.0 ; 1.0 , 1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1[2].m_flow ; tabsSouth1[1].m_flow ] = [ tabsNorth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow + tabsNorth1[1].m_flow + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow + $cse422 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow) - spl1.res1.m_flow - valSouth.res3.m_flow ; pipSouth1.m_flow + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1[1].m_flow since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 2 : valSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 3 : valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.2.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 4 : tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.2.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ -tabsSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0 2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 2 : valSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 3 : valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth2.2.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 4 : tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = valSouth2.2.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 [ 1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 ; 0.0 , 0.0 , -1.0 , 1.0 ; 0.0 , 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 ; 1.0 , -1.0 , 0.0 , 0.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.1.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.2.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.2.port_a.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ -tabsSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.6.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -valSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; -tabsSouth2.2.dp.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable valSouth2.6.port_b.p.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(4,4) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Warning: The linear system: 1 : tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 = 0.0 2 : spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 - $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 = 0.0 [ 1.0 , 1.0 ; -1.0 , -1.0 ] * [ tabsSouth1.2.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] = [ pipSouth1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + (-tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29) - tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 ; tabsSouth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + $cse422.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsNorth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[8].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[7].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[6].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[5].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[3].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[2].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth2[1].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + tabsSouth1[4].m_flow.SeedStateSetJac29 + (-valNorth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29) - spl1.res1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 - valSouth.res3.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 ] might be structurally or numerically singular for variable tabsSouth1.1.m_flow.$pDERStateSetJac29.dummyVarStateSetJac29 since U(2,2) = 0.0. It might be hard to solve. Compilation continues anyway. Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 0.8295/12.62, allocations: 53.05 MB / 3.75 GB, free: 428.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.2969/12.92, allocations: 124 MB / 3.871 GB, free: 393.3 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.02314/12.94, allocations: 7.692 MB / 3.878 GB, free: 387.6 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.01163/12.95, allocations: 231 kB / 3.879 GB, free: 387.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.09213/13.04, allocations: 5.581 MB / 3.884 GB, free: 384.3 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.006059/13.05, allocations: 1.147 MB / 3.885 GB, free: 383.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.004774/13.06, allocations: 0.8767 MB / 3.886 GB, free: 382.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02534/13.08, allocations: 12.16 MB / 3.898 GB, free: 370.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 8.32e-07/13.08, allocations: 0 / 3.898 GB, free: 370.1 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.1816/13.26, allocations: 86.5 MB / 3.982 GB, free: 283.8 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 5 * Number of states: 74 ($STATESET1.x[32],$STATESET1.x[31],$STATESET1.x[30],$STATESET1.x[29],$STATESET1.x[28],$STATESET1.x[27],$STATESET1.x[26],$STATESET1.x[25],$STATESET1.x[24],$STATESET1.x[23],$STATESET1.x[22],$STATESET1.x[21],$STATESET1.x[20],$STATESET1.x[19],$STATESET1.x[18],$STATESET1.x[17],$STATESET1.x[16],$STATESET1.x[15],$STATESET1.x[14],$STATESET1.x[13],$STATESET1.x[12],$STATESET1.x[11],$STATESET1.x[10],$STATESET1.x[9],$STATESET1.x[8],$STATESET1.x[7],$STATESET1.x[6],$STATESET1.x[5],$STATESET1.x[4],$STATESET1.x[3],$STATESET1.x[2],$STATESET1.x[1],pmpSouth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpSouth.filter.s[1],pmpNorth.vol.dynBal.U,pmpNorth.filter.s[1],valSouth1[1].filter.s[1],valSouth1[2].filter.s[1],valSouth1[3].filter.s[1],valSouth1[4].filter.s[1],valSouth2[1].filter.s[1],valSouth2[2].filter.s[1],valSouth2[3].filter.s[1],valSouth2[4].filter.s[1],valSouth2[5].filter.s[1],valSouth2[6].filter.s[1],valSouth2[7].filter.s[1],valSouth2[8].filter.s[1],valNorth1[1].filter.s[1],valNorth1[2].filter.s[1],valNorth1[3].filter.s[1],valNorth1[4].filter.s[1],valNorth2[1].filter.s[1],valNorth2[2].filter.s[1],valNorth2[3].filter.s[1],valNorth2[4].filter.s[1],valNorth2[5].filter.s[1],valNorth2[6].filter.s[1],valNorth2[7].filter.s[1],valNorth2[8].filter.s[1],valSouth.vol.dynBal.U,valSouth.filter.s[1],valNorth.vol.dynBal.U,valNorth.filter.s[1],spl.vol.dynBal.U,spl1.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.vol.dynBal.U,pumpHea.filter.s[1],valHea.filter.s[1],valCoo.filter.s[1],spl2.vol.dynBal.U,spl3.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.vol.dynBal.U,pumpCoo.filter.s[1]) * Number of discrete variables: 7 ($whenCondition2,$whenCondition1,stepPump.y,stepPump.pulseStart,pumpHea.stage,stepValve.T_start,stepValve.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (stepValve.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (595): * Single equations (assignments): 572 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 10 * When equations: 3 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (linear and non-linear blocks): 6 * Torn equation systems: 4 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Equation system details: * Constant Jacobian: 0 * Linear Jacobian (size,density): 0 * Non-linear Jacobian: 6 {1,1,1,1,1,1} * Without analytic Jacobian: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems: 1 {(28,89.3%) 28} * Non-linear torn systems: 3 {33 156,1 1,61 217} Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.2728/13.54, allocations: 124.9 MB / 4.104 GB, free: 159.4 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.1601/13.7, allocations: 98.19 MB / 4.2 GB, free: 61.27 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.204e-05/13.7, allocations: 10.95 kB / 4.2 GB, free: 61.26 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.781/14.48, allocations: 86.49 MB / 4.285 GB, free: 440.7 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.07754/14.55, allocations: 7.649 MB / 4.292 GB, free: 440.2 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 1.094/15.65, allocations: 419.9 MB / 4.702 GB, free: 49.02 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01842/15.67, allocations: 10.66 MB / 4.713 GB, free: 38.32 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.03758/15.7, allocations: 8.449 MB / 4.721 GB, free: 29.86 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.02743/15.73, allocations: 11.18 MB / 4.732 GB, free: 18.68 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.074e-06/15.73, allocations: 11.88 kB / 4.732 GB, free: 18.66 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 2.46/18.19, allocations: 0.8623 GB / 5.594 GB, free: 99.18 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: configured platform static using cached values: time 0.0001308/18.19, allocations: 252.2 kB / 5.594 GB, free: 98.85 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 20.63/38.82, allocations: 0 / 5.594 GB, free: 98.85 MB / 1.264 GB (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.sim & /home/hudson/saved_omc/OMSimulator/install/linux/bin/OMSimulator -r=Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic_res.mat --tempDir=temp_Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic_fmu --startTime=0 --stopTime=1000 --timeout=50 --tolerance=1e-06 Buildings_9_Buildings_Fluid_Examples_FlowSystem_Basic.fmu > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic.pipe 2>&1) TODO: How the !@#!# did the simulation report success but simulation result Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.Examples.FlowSystem.Basic_res.mat does not exist to compare? outputFormat=mat