Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00166/0.00166, allocations: 111.2 kB / 17.61 MB, free: 4.703 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001927/0.001927, allocations: 186 kB / 20.78 MB, free: 1.547 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.409/1.409, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.4 MB, free: 2.992 MB / 190.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.887/2.887, allocations: 496.2 MB / 0.7819 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 0.6231 GB " [Timeout remaining time 176] Using package Buildings with version 12.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 12.0.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002062/0.002062, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.136 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.9894/0.9915, allocations: 173.6 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 33.45 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.02841/1.02, allocations: 32.33 MB / 1.337 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01947/1.039, allocations: 12.37 MB / 1.349 GB, free: 1.793 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003062/1.042, allocations: 63.5 kB / 1.349 GB, free: 1.77 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004243/1.047, allocations: 1.128 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 1.184 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00835/1.055, allocations: 2.152 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 15.93 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007989/1.063, allocations: 1.889 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02976/1.093, allocations: 19.62 MB / 1.373 GB, free: 6.758 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01129/1.104, allocations: 5.367 MB / 1.379 GB, free: 4.57 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01682/1.121, allocations: 6.636 MB / 1.385 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01449/1.135, allocations: 5.633 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004993/1.14, allocations: 0.7488 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01423/1.155, allocations: 3.229 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.007949/1.163, allocations: 3.091 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 13.59 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01764/1.18, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 10.64 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03064/1.211, allocations: 15.5 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 1.594 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 8.386e-06/1.211, allocations: 5.047 kB / 1.417 GB, free: 1.59 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.433e-06/1.211, allocations: 0 / 1.417 GB, free: 1.59 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005276/1.211, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.417 GB, free: 1.586 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04644/1.258, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.429 GB, free: 10.18 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 7.407e-05/1.258, allocations: 16.45 kB / 1.429 GB, free: 10.17 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.009616/1.267, allocations: 0.9229 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 9.441 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02708/1.295, allocations: 9.682 MB / 1.439 GB, free: 15.69 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003484/1.295, allocations: 338.7 kB / 1.439 GB, free: 15.36 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002208/1.297, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 14.88 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01347/1.311, allocations: 5.963 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.684 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.068e-05/1.311, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.672 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000583/1.311, allocations: 144 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.531 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001123/1.311, allocations: 99.94 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.434 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009558/1.321, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.656 MB / 1.123 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06883/1.39, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 204 kB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01421/1.404, allocations: 6.052 MB / 1.49 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005035/1.409, allocations: 2.423 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 7.621 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03325/1.442, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 9.84 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004979/1.447, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 7.684 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 6.672e-06/1.447, allocations: 0 / 1.507 GB, free: 7.684 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04364/1.491, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.521 GB, free: 9.23 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.783e-05/1.491, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.521 GB, free: 9.078 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02845/1.519, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 14.66 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001605/1.521, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.531 GB, free: 14.54 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00747/1.528, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.535 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002758/1.531, allocations: 0.9143 MB / 1.535 GB, free: 10.25 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005581/1.537, allocations: 1.206 MB / 1.537 GB, free: 9.035 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001299/1.537, allocations: 313 kB / 1.537 GB, free: 8.727 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.007528/1.544, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.54 GB, free: 5.262 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.0107/1.555, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 14.12 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07753/1.633, allocations: 36.63 MB / 1.582 GB, free: 8.039 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.66e-05/1.633, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.582 GB, free: 8.012 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02584/1.659, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.592 GB, free: 13.84 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001802/1.659, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.592 GB, free: 13.76 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001505/1.659, allocations: 84.91 kB / 1.592 GB, free: 13.68 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001978/1.661, allocations: 0.7083 MB / 1.593 GB, free: 12.95 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006096/1.667, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 11.46 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01403/1.681, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01025/1.691, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.609 GB, free: 10.77 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001359/1.693, allocations: 276 kB / 1.61 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01472/1.707, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.617 GB, free: 3.398 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009661/1.717, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.622 GB, free: 12.26 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07239/1.789, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.658 GB, free: 6.238 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.19e-05/1.79, allocations: 24 kB / 1.658 GB, free: 6.215 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02283/1.812, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.668 GB, free: 12.03 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001092/1.812, allocations: 73.95 kB / 1.668 GB, free: 11.95 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001285/1.813, allocations: 84 kB / 1.668 GB, free: 11.87 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001823/1.814, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00613/1.821, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.67 GB, free: 9.66 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01433/1.835, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.684 GB, free: 10.16 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01179/1.847, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.686 GB, free: 8.973 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.00171/1.848, allocations: 280 kB / 1.686 GB, free: 8.699 MB / 1.373 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002959/1.851, allocations: 0.7537 MB / 1.687 GB, free: 7.941 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003167/1.855, allocations: 0.6984 MB / 1.687 GB, free: 7.238 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01208/1.867, allocations: 5.139 MB / 1.692 GB, free: 2.062 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.622e-05/1.867, allocations: 28 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 2.035 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.491e-05/1.867, allocations: 4 kB / 1.692 GB, free: 2.031 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006705/1.873, allocations: 3.946 MB / 1.696 GB, free: 14.05 MB / 1.389 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03722/1.911, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.709 GB, free: 432 kB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.339e-05/1.911, allocations: 0 / 1.709 GB, free: 432 kB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002916/1.914, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.71 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001741/1.915, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.71 GB, free: 15.21 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005433/1.916, allocations: 135.8 kB / 1.711 GB, free: 15.08 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01385/1.93, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.725 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.3e-06/1.93, allocations: 4 kB / 1.725 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01447/1.944, allocations: 7.153 MB / 1.732 GB, free: 8.461 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006127/1.95, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.733 GB, free: 6.738 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003807/1.954, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.733 GB, free: 6.613 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007405/1.961, allocations: 0.6125 MB / 1.734 GB, free: 6 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.001044/1.963, allocations: 173.6 kB / 1.734 GB, free: 5.828 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0006405/1.963, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.734 GB, free: 5.746 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01926/1.982, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.741 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.91e-07/1.982, allocations: 0 / 1.741 GB, free: 14.43 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02188/2.004, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.745 GB, free: 10.46 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003196/2.007, allocations: 0.5993 MB / 1.746 GB, free: 9.859 MB / 1.436 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02481/2.032, allocations: 13.12 MB / 1.759 GB, free: 12.56 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.043e-05/2.032, allocations: 0 / 1.759 GB, free: 12.56 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005469/2.038, allocations: 2.969 MB / 1.762 GB, free: 9.5 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0181/2.056, allocations: 2.932 MB / 1.764 GB, free: 6.613 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.0399/2.096, allocations: 19.14 MB / 1.783 GB, free: 3.371 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01201/2.108, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.788 GB, free: 13.96 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01776/2.126, allocations: 6.43 MB / 1.795 GB, free: 7.543 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003528/2.129, allocations: 431.3 kB / 1.795 GB, free: 7.121 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 2.354e-06/2.129, allocations: 0 / 1.795 GB, free: 7.121 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.9643/3.093, allocations: 139.7 MB / 1.931 GB, free: 485.9 MB / 1.561 GB " [Timeout remaining time 297] make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 400] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "" [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 14.789704526774585]