Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007767/0.007767, allocations: 102 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.051 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001871/0.001871, allocations: 191.4 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.965 MB / 14.72 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.376/1.376, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.13 MB / 206.1 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.213/2.213, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 0.6094 MB / 0.5294 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001219/0.001219, allocations: 68.08 kB / 0.9509 GB, free: 7.527 MB / 0.7325 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.8387/0.8399, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 5.473 MB / 0.8575 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03402/0.874, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02088/0.8949, allocations: 12.3 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.039 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003546/0.8985, allocations: 60.41 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.02 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003985/0.9025, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 5.426 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007076/0.9096, allocations: 2.15 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 4.176 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005984/0.9156, allocations: 1.869 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 3.246 MB / 0.8887 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0222/0.9378, allocations: 19.58 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 11.04 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01086/0.9487, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 7.727 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01406/0.9628, allocations: 6.543 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.406 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01145/0.9743, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.188 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002896/0.9772, allocations: 0.7535 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.184 MB / 0.9044 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01088/0.9881, allocations: 3.209 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.73 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.005585/0.9938, allocations: 3.004 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.67 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.0172/1.011, allocations: 4.755 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 0.92 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02056/1.032, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.234e-06/1.032, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.713e-06/1.032, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004046/1.032, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 10.86 MB / 0.9356 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.02686/1.059, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.249e-05/1.059, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.24 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002918/1.062, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.35 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.01899/1.081, allocations: 9.613 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.664 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.00024/1.081, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.336 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001129/1.082, allocations: 483.7 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.863 MB / 0.9512 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.009699/1.092, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.67 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.418e-05/1.092, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.65 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0003882/1.093, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.51 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.552e-05/1.093, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.42 MB / 0.9669 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008091/1.101, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.648 MB / 0.9669 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.05678/1.158, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 5.238 MB / 0.9981 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01213/1.17, allocations: 6.241 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 14.89 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004357/1.174, allocations: 2.544 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 12.34 MB / 1.014 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02805/1.202, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.56 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00408/1.206, allocations: 2.13 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 8.106e-06/1.206, allocations: 0 / 1.29 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 1.029 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03318/1.24, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.2 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.574e-05/1.24, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.05 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02439/1.264, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.625 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001115/1.265, allocations: 121.6 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.5 MB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.005706/1.271, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 180 kB / 1.045 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002163/1.273, allocations: 0.8708 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003898/1.277, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 14.08 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001589/1.277, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.78 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006766/1.284, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 1.061 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008393/1.292, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.168 MB / 1.061 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06385/1.356, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 13.07 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.501e-05/1.356, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 13.05 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01911/1.376, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.898 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000132/1.376, allocations: 73.69 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.82 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001744/1.376, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.734 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001811/1.378, allocations: 0.7084 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.004 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00536/1.383, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.5234 MB / 1.107 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01303/1.396, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.02 MB / 1.123 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009175/1.405, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.83 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001207/1.407, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.56 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01311/1.42, allocations: 7.089 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.461 MB / 1.139 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.00798/1.428, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.328 MB / 1.139 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06292/1.491, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.3 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 9.088e-05/1.491, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.28 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02021/1.511, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 1.121 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000117/1.511, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.047 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001439/1.511, allocations: 84 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 0.9648 MB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001777/1.513, allocations: 0.7086 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 240 kB / 1.186 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005535/1.519, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.75 MB / 1.201 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01317/1.532, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01083/1.543, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 14.07 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001424/1.544, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.79 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002359/1.546, allocations: 0.7547 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.03 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002654/1.549, allocations: 0.6633 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.36 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01119/1.56, allocations: 5.152 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.172 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.342e-05/1.56, allocations: 20 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.152 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 3.517e-05/1.56, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.141 MB / 1.217 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006738/1.567, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.145 MB / 1.217 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02934/1.597, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.492 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.488e-05/1.597, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.488 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002706/1.599, allocations: 0.5972 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 4.891 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.00159/1.601, allocations: 0.5834 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.285 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004194/1.601, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.152 MB / 1.232 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01221/1.614, allocations: 14.37 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.793 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.421e-06/1.614, allocations: 4 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.789 MB / 1.248 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01222/1.626, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 13.58 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.004844/1.631, allocations: 1.664 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002432/1.633, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.76 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005924/1.639, allocations: 0.6123 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.15 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006108/1.64, allocations: 173.6 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.98 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003576/1.64, allocations: 83.89 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.9 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.02065/1.661, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.578 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.2e-07/1.661, allocations: 4 kB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.574 MB / 1.264 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01858/1.679, allocations: 3.961 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.61 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002437/1.682, allocations: 0.6017 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.02 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02468/1.707, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.541 GB, free: 1.398 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.273e-05/1.707, allocations: 0 / 1.541 GB, free: 1.398 MB / 1.279 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006863/1.714, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.544 GB, free: 14.26 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02008/1.734, allocations: 2.947 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 1.295 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03745/1.771, allocations: 18.75 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 8.535 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009396/1.781, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 3.121 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.5939/2.375, allocations: 6.419 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 404.6 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.002708/2.377, allocations: 431.2 kB / 1.578 GB, free: 404.6 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.252e-06/2.377, allocations: 1.062 kB / 1.578 GB, free: 404.6 MB / 1.311 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.1996/2.577, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 331.4 MB / 1.311 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480  -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)
diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001)
Reference file matches