Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.007873/0.007873, allocations: 102.3 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 5.578 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001662/0.001662, allocations: 195.2 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.52 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.334/1.334, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 15.17 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.26/2.26, allocations: 390.2 MB / 0.6648 GB, free: 0.6445 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001244/0.001244, allocations: 71.89 kB / 0.9509 GB, free: 7.621 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.801/0.8023, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.088 GB, free: 5.508 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.0354/0.8377, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.119 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02199/0.8597, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.086 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003339/0.8631, allocations: 62.88 kB / 1.131 GB, free: 6.062 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.005294/0.8684, allocations: 1.112 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 5.473 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007998/0.8766, allocations: 2.153 MB / 1.134 GB, free: 4.223 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007104/0.8837, allocations: 1.875 MB / 1.136 GB, free: 3.285 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03413/0.9178, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.155 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01416/0.932, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.162 GB, free: 7.785 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01651/0.9486, allocations: 6.533 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.469 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01197/0.9606, allocations: 5.351 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.25 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003787/0.9644, allocations: 0.7493 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.25 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.0112/0.9756, allocations: 3.213 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.79 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006106/0.9818, allocations: 3.002 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01407/0.9959, allocations: 4.757 MB / 1.185 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02464/1.021, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.177e-06/1.021, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.533e-06/1.021, allocations: 0 / 1.2 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000594/1.021, allocations: 8 kB / 1.2 GB, free: 10.91 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03281/1.054, allocations: 11.5 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.3 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.368e-05/1.054, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004219/1.058, allocations: 0.8803 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 14.4 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02272/1.081, allocations: 9.625 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.707 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.000385/1.081, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.383 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002029/1.084, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 3.914 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01381/1.097, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.71 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001513/1.098, allocations: 11.94 kB / 1.228 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001052/1.099, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001099/1.099, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.46 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009127/1.108, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.233 GB, free: 8.695 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06091/1.169, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 5.281 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01188/1.181, allocations: 6.237 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 14.94 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004058/1.185, allocations: 2.544 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 12.39 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02475/1.21, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.61 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.00339/1.213, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.919e-06/1.213, allocations: 4 kB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.45 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03128/1.244, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.573e-05/1.244, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.09 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02116/1.266, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.676 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0009826/1.267, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.551 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.00458/1.271, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 236 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002138/1.273, allocations: 0.8784 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003456/1.277, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 14.13 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.203e-05/1.277, allocations: 309.1 kB / 1.319 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005448/1.282, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 10.36 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.007105/1.29, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.223 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06181/1.351, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 13.13 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.078e-05/1.352, allocations: 24 kB / 1.364 GB, free: 13.11 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01972/1.371, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.945 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.000144/1.371, allocations: 69.69 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.871 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001666/1.372, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.374 GB, free: 2.785 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001903/1.374, allocations: 0.7124 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.051 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00545/1.379, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.5703 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01312/1.392, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.074 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.00972/1.402, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.89 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001306/1.403, allocations: 280 kB / 1.392 GB, free: 15.62 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01405/1.417, allocations: 7.096 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 8.508 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008456/1.426, allocations: 5.92 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.383 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06282/1.489, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.35 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.151e-05/1.489, allocations: 31.94 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.32 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01877/1.507, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 1.164 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 8.926e-05/1.508, allocations: 73.64 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.086 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001348/1.508, allocations: 84 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.004 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001661/1.509, allocations: 0.7089 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 280 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005293/1.515, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.79 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0128/1.528, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.467 GB, free: 15.29 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009278/1.537, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 14.11 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001343/1.538, allocations: 268 kB / 1.468 GB, free: 13.85 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002659/1.541, allocations: 0.7533 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.08 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00305/1.544, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.41 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01048/1.554, allocations: 5.151 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.223 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.081e-05/1.554, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.195 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.352e-05/1.555, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.191 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006245/1.561, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.195 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.02968/1.59, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.547 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.377e-05/1.591, allocations: 352 / 1.492 GB, free: 5.547 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002652/1.593, allocations: 0.6046 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 4.941 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001606/1.595, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.336 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0004381/1.595, allocations: 139.9 kB / 1.493 GB, free: 4.199 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01286/1.608, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.836 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.961e-06/1.608, allocations: 3.984 kB / 1.507 GB, free: 4.832 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01387/1.622, allocations: 7.117 MB / 1.514 GB, free: 13.62 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.005418/1.627, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.94 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002578/1.63, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.81 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.005795/1.636, allocations: 0.6241 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.19 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006078/1.637, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003905/1.637, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 10.94 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01665/1.654, allocations: 7.331 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.621 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.01e-07/1.654, allocations: 4 kB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.617 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02019/1.674, allocations: 3.957 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002403/1.676, allocations: 0.5918 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.07 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.0241/1.7, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.541 GB, free: 1.453 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 9.839e-06/1.7, allocations: 320 / 1.541 GB, free: 1.453 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005218/1.706, allocations: 3.052 MB / 1.544 GB, free: 14.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01634/1.722, allocations: 2.937 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 11.42 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03512/1.757, allocations: 18.77 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 8.582 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009016/1.766, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 3.168 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.6084/2.375, allocations: 6.424 MB / 1.577 GB, free: 404.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.00346/2.378, allocations: 426 kB / 1.577 GB, free: 404.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.292e-06/2.378, allocations: 0.9688 kB / 1.577 GB, free: 404.7 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2022/2.58, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 331.5 MB / 1.311 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches