Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001632/0.001632, allocations: 113.9 kB / 17.61 MB, free: 4.684 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00173/0.00173, allocations: 185.9 kB / 20.78 MB, free: 1.52 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.437/1.437, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.4 MB, free: 3.156 MB / 190.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo): time 2.835/2.835, allocations: 476.7 MB / 0.7629 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 0.6075 GB " [Timeout remaining time 177] Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-maint.11.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001961/0.001961, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.107 GB, free: 4.586 MB / 0.8419 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.07/1.072, allocations: 168.7 MB / 1.272 GB, free: 7.918 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.05311/1.125, allocations: 32.28 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 1.02 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02296/1.148, allocations: 12.38 MB / 1.316 GB, free: 8.297 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003086/1.151, allocations: 59.97 kB / 1.316 GB, free: 8.277 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004137/1.155, allocations: 1.126 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 7.691 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00755/1.163, allocations: 2.153 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 6.445 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006352/1.169, allocations: 1.895 MB / 1.321 GB, free: 5.492 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02455/1.194, allocations: 19.62 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 13.27 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01127/1.205, allocations: 5.357 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 11.09 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01533/1.22, allocations: 6.564 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 8.156 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.0137/1.234, allocations: 5.653 MB / 1.357 GB, free: 4.707 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.00353/1.238, allocations: 0.7487 MB / 1.358 GB, free: 4.707 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01076/1.248, allocations: 3.238 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.238 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006373/1.255, allocations: 3.084 MB / 1.364 GB, free: 1.105 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01331/1.268, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.88 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02735/1.296, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.384 GB, free: 2.535 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 1.054e-05/1.296, allocations: 4 kB / 1.384 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.194e-06/1.296, allocations: 0 / 1.384 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.000536/1.296, allocations: 0 / 1.384 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04198/1.338, allocations: 11.75 MB / 1.395 GB, free: 6.66 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 6.216e-05/1.338, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.395 GB, free: 6.648 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005555/1.344, allocations: 0.9286 MB / 1.396 GB, free: 5.715 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02585/1.369, allocations: 9.678 MB / 1.406 GB, free: 11.96 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003983/1.37, allocations: 330.8 kB / 1.406 GB, free: 11.64 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001935/1.372, allocations: 483.9 kB / 1.406 GB, free: 11.17 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01446/1.386, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.973 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 9.722e-05/1.386, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.961 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0006222/1.387, allocations: 148 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.816 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001162/1.387, allocations: 88 kB / 1.412 GB, free: 4.73 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01014/1.397, allocations: 4.766 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 15.95 MB / 1.107 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07474/1.472, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 12.5 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01327/1.485, allocations: 6.041 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 6.348 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004994/1.49, allocations: 2.431 MB / 1.458 GB, free: 3.918 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.0303/1.521, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 6.133 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003974/1.525, allocations: 2.141 MB / 1.473 GB, free: 3.973 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.388e-06/1.525, allocations: 0 / 1.473 GB, free: 3.973 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03655/1.561, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.487 GB, free: 5.531 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001128/1.561, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.487 GB, free: 5.375 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02473/1.586, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 10.95 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001103/1.587, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 10.82 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006117/1.593, allocations: 3.345 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 7.465 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002358/1.596, allocations: 0.9143 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 6.543 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.002964/1.598, allocations: 1.218 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 5.316 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001337/1.599, allocations: 301.1 kB / 1.503 GB, free: 5.02 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005931/1.605, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 1.559 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009378/1.614, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.513 GB, free: 10.42 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07223/1.686, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 4.32 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.613e-05/1.686, allocations: 24 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 4.297 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02288/1.709, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 10.11 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001707/1.709, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.558 GB, free: 10.04 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001914/1.709, allocations: 84 kB / 1.558 GB, free: 9.961 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002153/1.712, allocations: 0.7162 MB / 1.559 GB, free: 9.223 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006115/1.718, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.56 GB, free: 7.742 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01456/1.732, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.575 GB, free: 8.246 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009877/1.742, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 7.062 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001452/1.744, allocations: 276 kB / 1.576 GB, free: 6.793 MB / 1.264 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01415/1.758, allocations: 7.095 MB / 1.583 GB, free: 15.68 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009131/1.767, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.589 GB, free: 8.551 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07194/1.839, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 2.531 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.962e-05/1.839, allocations: 24.16 kB / 1.625 GB, free: 2.508 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02416/1.863, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.634 GB, free: 8.324 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001504/1.863, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.634 GB, free: 8.254 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001635/1.863, allocations: 84 kB / 1.635 GB, free: 8.172 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002074/1.865, allocations: 0.7167 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 7.434 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006192/1.872, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.637 GB, free: 5.949 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01599/1.888, allocations: 14.52 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 6.453 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01108/1.899, allocations: 1.193 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 5.258 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001572/1.9, allocations: 276 kB / 1.652 GB, free: 4.988 MB / 1.342 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002611/1.903, allocations: 0.7497 MB / 1.653 GB, free: 4.223 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003217/1.906, allocations: 0.6946 MB / 1.654 GB, free: 3.523 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.012/1.918, allocations: 5.146 MB / 1.659 GB, free: 14.34 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.464e-05/1.918, allocations: 27.98 kB / 1.659 GB, free: 14.32 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.3e-05/1.918, allocations: 4 kB / 1.659 GB, free: 14.31 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.007539/1.926, allocations: 3.95 MB / 1.663 GB, free: 10.33 MB / 1.357 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03993/1.966, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.676 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 2.01e-05/1.966, allocations: 4 kB / 1.676 GB, free: 12.69 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.003067/1.969, allocations: 0.5971 MB / 1.676 GB, free: 12.09 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001961/1.971, allocations: 0.5833 MB / 1.677 GB, free: 11.49 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0007217/1.971, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.677 GB, free: 11.36 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01536/1.987, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.691 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 8.095e-06/1.987, allocations: 4 kB / 1.691 GB, free: 11.98 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01841/2.005, allocations: 7.155 MB / 1.698 GB, free: 4.738 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00652/2.012, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 3.016 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003448/2.015, allocations: 119.9 kB / 1.7 GB, free: 2.898 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007035/2.022, allocations: 0.6161 MB / 1.7 GB, free: 2.281 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0009391/2.023, allocations: 165.6 kB / 1.701 GB, free: 2.117 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005893/2.024, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.701 GB, free: 2.035 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.0221/2.046, allocations: 7.343 MB / 1.708 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.4e-07/2.046, allocations: 0 / 1.708 GB, free: 10.7 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02674/2.073, allocations: 3.968 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 6.734 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003288/2.076, allocations: 0.5893 MB / 1.712 GB, free: 6.148 MB / 1.404 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02872/2.105, allocations: 13.12 MB / 1.725 GB, free: 8.844 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.278e-05/2.105, allocations: 0 / 1.725 GB, free: 8.844 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.006809/2.111, allocations: 2.966 MB / 1.728 GB, free: 5.785 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02261/2.134, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.731 GB, free: 2.891 MB / 1.42 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04564/2.18, allocations: 19.15 MB / 1.75 GB, free: 15.66 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01349/2.193, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.755 GB, free: 10.25 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0182/2.211, allocations: 6.429 MB / 1.761 GB, free: 3.828 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003294/2.215, allocations: 427.4 kB / 1.761 GB, free: 3.41 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.363e-06/2.215, allocations: 0 / 1.761 GB, free: 3.41 MB / 1.451 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.8707/3.085, allocations: 139.7 MB / 1.898 GB, free: 481.7 MB / 1.529 GB " [Timeout remaining time 297] make -j1 -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 400] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_11.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_11_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "" [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 14.563719323836267]