Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.00714/0.00714, allocations: 99.47 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.449 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001588/0.001588, allocations: 200 kB / 16.68 MB, free: 6.352 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.487/1.487, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.305 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.651/2.651, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7105 GB, free: 5.035 MB / 0.5606 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001426/0.001426, allocations: 63.91 kB / 1.019 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 0.7794 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2837/0.2852, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 6.781 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.03525/0.3204, allocations: 31.77 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 6.883 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01845/0.3389, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 10.56 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002122/0.3411, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.21 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003325/0.3444, allocations: 1.127 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 9.363 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006112/0.3506, allocations: 2.139 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 7.215 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00542/0.356, allocations: 1.877 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 5.344 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02322/0.3793, allocations: 19.56 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 1.746 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01026/0.3896, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.241 GB, free: 10.46 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01397/0.4036, allocations: 6.535 MB / 1.247 GB, free: 3.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.6185/1.022, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.252 GB, free: 19.47 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003793/1.026, allocations: 0.7492 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 19.47 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009675/1.036, allocations: 3.218 MB / 1.256 GB, free: 19.47 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006025/1.042, allocations: 2.998 MB / 1.259 GB, free: 19.47 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01572/1.058, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 19.03 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.03018/1.088, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.279 GB, free: 17.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.935e-06/1.088, allocations: 0 / 1.279 GB, free: 17.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 4.088e-06/1.088, allocations: 1.562 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 17.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0006477/1.088, allocations: 4.812 kB / 1.279 GB, free: 17.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04101/1.13, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.338e-05/1.13, allocations: 16.11 kB / 1.291 GB, free: 13.32 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005565/1.135, allocations: 0.9162 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 12.84 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02412/1.159, allocations: 9.684 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003515/1.16, allocations: 332.1 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.35 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002773/1.162, allocations: 481.2 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 10.19 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01575/1.178, allocations: 5.962 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.883 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001914/1.178, allocations: 15.55 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.879 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001387/1.18, allocations: 148.2 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.77 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001308/1.18, allocations: 95.5 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 7.77 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009831/1.19, allocations: 4.761 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 6.387 MB / 0.9981 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06439/1.254, allocations: 33.8 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01232/1.267, allocations: 6.233 MB / 1.351 GB, free: 10.24 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005459/1.272, allocations: 2.542 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 9.012 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03043/1.303, allocations: 13.25 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 15.57 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004376/1.307, allocations: 2.138 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.905e-06/1.307, allocations: 0 / 1.369 GB, free: 13.55 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04566/1.353, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.875e-05/1.353, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 14.99 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02575/1.379, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.562 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001752/1.38, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 4.441 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.009487/1.39, allocations: 3.347 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 1.105 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.003173/1.393, allocations: 0.9149 MB / 1.398 GB, free: 208 kB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.007156/1.4, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.98 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001084/1.4, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 14.68 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0082/1.409, allocations: 3.451 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 11.21 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.01007/1.419, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 4.121 MB / 1.076 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0722/1.491, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.38 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.514e-05/1.491, allocations: 28 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02688/1.518, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.68 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001475/1.518, allocations: 65.7 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.609 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001521/1.518, allocations: 92.16 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 4.52 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001973/1.52, allocations: 0.7117 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 3.793 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006344/1.527, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 2.406 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01267/1.539, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 3.039 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01178/1.551, allocations: 1.181 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 1.859 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002155/1.553, allocations: 272 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 1.594 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0161/1.57, allocations: 7.086 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009516/1.579, allocations: 5.935 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 3.398 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06996/1.649, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.987e-05/1.649, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 13.71 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02503/1.674, allocations: 10.1 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 4.043 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001561/1.675, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.965 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001556/1.675, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 3.879 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001848/1.677, allocations: 0.7142 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 3.148 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006238/1.683, allocations: 1.475 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 1.766 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01311/1.696, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 2.383 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01307/1.709, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 1.203 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002181/1.711, allocations: 276 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 0.9336 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.003059/1.714, allocations: 0.7659 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 264 kB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003456/1.718, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 15.55 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01208/1.73, allocations: 5.148 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.39 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.272e-05/1.73, allocations: 24 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.064e-05/1.73, allocations: 4 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006519/1.737, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 6.383 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03691/1.773, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.828 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.386e-05/1.774, allocations: 4 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 8.824 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002805/1.776, allocations: 0.5958 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 8.246 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001693/1.778, allocations: 0.5819 MB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.648 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005436/1.779, allocations: 131.9 kB / 1.573 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01269/1.791, allocations: 14.41 MB / 1.587 GB, free: 8.203 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 4.589e-06/1.791, allocations: 0 / 1.587 GB, free: 8.203 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01507/1.806, allocations: 7.162 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 0.9727 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007009/1.813, allocations: 1.691 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 15.25 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003388/1.817, allocations: 126.8 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 15.13 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006705/1.824, allocations: 0.616 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.52 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0007442/1.824, allocations: 164.5 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0004704/1.825, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 14.28 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01802/1.843, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.604 GB, free: 6.953 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 5.41e-07/1.843, allocations: 4 kB / 1.604 GB, free: 6.949 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02266/1.866, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 2.984 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003156/1.869, allocations: 0.5982 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 2.445 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02508/1.894, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 5.324 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.291e-05/1.894, allocations: 4 kB / 1.621 GB, free: 5.32 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005564/1.9, allocations: 3.059 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 2.219 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02025/1.92, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.627 GB, free: 15.32 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04143/1.961, allocations: 19 MB / 1.646 GB, free: 12.32 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.008035/1.969, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.651 GB, free: 6.918 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01728/1.987, allocations: 6.431 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 0.5 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003227/1.99, allocations: 430 kB / 1.657 GB, free: 84 kB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 7.51e-07/1.99, allocations: 0 / 1.657 GB, free: 84 kB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.2182/2.208, allocations: 137.7 MB / 1.792 GB, free: 7.973 MB / 1.467 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches