Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001635/0.001635, allocations: 113.8 kB / 17.61 MB, free: 4.703 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001857/0.001857, allocations: 186 kB / 20.78 MB, free: 1.547 MB / 14.72 MB " [Timeout remaining time 180] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.439/1.439, allocations: 225.6 MB / 249.4 MB, free: 3.141 MB / 190.1 MB " [Timeout remaining time 178] loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) [Timeout 180] "Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.566/2.566, allocations: 443.4 MB / 0.7304 GB, free: 13.87 MB / 0.5762 GB " [Timeout remaining time 177] Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=2500,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") [Timeout 300] "Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002087/0.002087, allocations: 71.88 kB / 1.059 GB, free: 388 kB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3165/0.3186, allocations: 160.7 MB / 1.216 GB, free: 15.34 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.0382/0.3568, allocations: 32.28 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 14.93 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01975/0.3766, allocations: 12.38 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 2.52 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002086/0.3787, allocations: 63.62 kB / 1.26 GB, free: 2.457 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003142/0.3818, allocations: 1.127 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.5684/0.9502, allocations: 2.147 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 10.07 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.004625/0.9549, allocations: 1.884 MB / 1.265 GB, free: 10.07 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02222/0.9771, allocations: 19.6 MB / 1.284 GB, free: 9.898 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.009515/0.9866, allocations: 5.362 MB / 1.289 GB, free: 9.465 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.0139/1, allocations: 6.568 MB / 1.296 GB, free: 7.414 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01104/1.012, allocations: 5.648 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 5.367 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003063/1.015, allocations: 0.748 MB / 1.302 GB, free: 5.367 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.009471/1.024, allocations: 3.235 MB / 1.305 GB, free: 4.719 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.00579/1.03, allocations: 3.094 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 3.352 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01272/1.043, allocations: 4.749 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 436 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02511/1.068, allocations: 15.48 MB / 1.328 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.38e-06/1.068, allocations: 0 / 1.328 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.393e-06/1.068, allocations: 0 / 1.328 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0004293/1.068, allocations: 0 / 1.328 GB, free: 9.785 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03951/1.108, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 2.43 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 3.835e-05/1.108, allocations: 14.41 kB / 1.339 GB, free: 2.426 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004826/1.112, allocations: 0.9172 MB / 1.34 GB, free: 1.945 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02216/1.135, allocations: 9.686 MB / 1.35 GB, free: 12.23 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0002532/1.135, allocations: 331.9 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 12.07 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.001259/1.136, allocations: 482.3 kB / 1.35 GB, free: 11.91 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01096/1.147, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.656 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 8.897e-05/1.147, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.641 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.000466/1.148, allocations: 152 kB / 1.356 GB, free: 6.496 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 9.737e-05/1.148, allocations: 92 kB / 1.357 GB, free: 6.406 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.008585/1.156, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 1.637 MB / 1.029 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06595/1.222, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.394 GB, free: 14.36 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01345/1.236, allocations: 6.045 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8.277 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004633/1.24, allocations: 2.427 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 5.848 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02998/1.27, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.415 GB, free: 8.117 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004046/1.274, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.417 GB, free: 5.961 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 5.811e-06/1.274, allocations: 1.312 kB / 1.417 GB, free: 5.961 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03641/1.311, allocations: 14.28 MB / 1.431 GB, free: 7.52 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001141/1.311, allocations: 132.8 kB / 1.432 GB, free: 7.363 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0288/1.34, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.95 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001311/1.341, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.442 GB, free: 12.82 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.007481/1.349, allocations: 3.35 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 9.484 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00266/1.351, allocations: 0.9107 MB / 1.446 GB, free: 8.586 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005606/1.357, allocations: 1.21 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 7.367 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001592/1.357, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 7.066 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0065/1.363, allocations: 3.447 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 3.605 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.009213/1.373, allocations: 5.939 MB / 1.457 GB, free: 12.47 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0711/1.444, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 6.406 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.0001138/1.444, allocations: 31.69 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 6.379 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.03616/1.48, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.502 GB, free: 12.2 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002256/1.48, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.502 GB, free: 12.13 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002331/1.481, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.502 GB, free: 12.04 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.003242/1.484, allocations: 0.711 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 11.31 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.009785/1.494, allocations: 1.482 MB / 1.505 GB, free: 9.828 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01701/1.511, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.519 GB, free: 10.37 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01131/1.522, allocations: 1.182 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 9.188 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001721/1.524, allocations: 272 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 8.922 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01652/1.54, allocations: 7.093 MB / 1.527 GB, free: 1.816 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01135/1.551, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.533 GB, free: 10.69 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.07897/1.63, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.569 GB, free: 4.699 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.139e-05/1.631, allocations: 24 kB / 1.569 GB, free: 4.676 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02883/1.659, allocations: 10.09 MB / 1.579 GB, free: 10.5 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001431/1.659, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.579 GB, free: 10.43 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001551/1.66, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.579 GB, free: 10.34 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001954/1.662, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.579 GB, free: 9.609 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00622/1.668, allocations: 1.483 MB / 1.581 GB, free: 8.125 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01561/1.683, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 8.637 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01274/1.696, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 7.449 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.002745/1.699, allocations: 272 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 7.184 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.004284/1.703, allocations: 0.7661 MB / 1.597 GB, free: 6.414 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004109/1.707, allocations: 0.6946 MB / 1.598 GB, free: 5.715 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01286/1.72, allocations: 5.14 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 0.5391 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.499e-05/1.72, allocations: 24 kB / 1.603 GB, free: 0.5156 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.368e-05/1.72, allocations: 11.98 kB / 1.603 GB, free: 0.5039 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00703/1.727, allocations: 3.952 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 12.52 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03588/1.763, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.62 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.132e-05/1.763, allocations: 4 kB / 1.62 GB, free: 14.95 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002974/1.766, allocations: 0.6049 MB / 1.62 GB, free: 14.34 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001821/1.768, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 13.74 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.00055/1.768, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.621 GB, free: 13.61 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01487/1.783, allocations: 14.4 MB / 1.635 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.49e-06/1.783, allocations: 4 kB / 1.635 GB, free: 14.24 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01542/1.799, allocations: 7.153 MB / 1.642 GB, free: 7.004 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006057/1.805, allocations: 1.695 MB / 1.644 GB, free: 5.285 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.00308/1.808, allocations: 127.8 kB / 1.644 GB, free: 5.16 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006743/1.815, allocations: 0.6083 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 4.551 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.000926/1.816, allocations: 169.7 kB / 1.645 GB, free: 4.383 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005681/1.816, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.645 GB, free: 4.301 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01889/1.835, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.652 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 2.21e-07/1.835, allocations: 0 / 1.652 GB, free: 12.98 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.0226/1.858, allocations: 3.96 MB / 1.656 GB, free: 9.016 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003035/1.861, allocations: 0.6015 MB / 1.656 GB, free: 8.445 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02636/1.887, allocations: 13.13 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.033e-05/1.887, allocations: 0 / 1.669 GB, free: 11.14 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005981/1.893, allocations: 2.966 MB / 1.672 GB, free: 8.09 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02044/1.913, allocations: 2.939 MB / 1.675 GB, free: 5.195 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.0441/1.958, allocations: 19.15 MB / 1.694 GB, free: 1.996 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01147/1.969, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.699 GB, free: 12.59 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01856/1.988, allocations: 6.424 MB / 1.705 GB, free: 6.176 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003772/1.991, allocations: 435.4 kB / 1.706 GB, free: 5.75 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.373e-06/1.991, allocations: 0 / 1.706 GB, free: 5.75 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.8611/2.853, allocations: 139.7 MB / 1.842 GB, free: 0.4931 GB / 1.498 GB " [Timeout remaining time 297] make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile [Timeout 300] (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=400 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) [Timeout 400] diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) [Timeout 300] "" [Timeout remaining time 300] Reference file matches [Calling sys.exit(0), Time elapsed: 14.024074397981167]