Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-master/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 11.1.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-master/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) "" <> buildModelFMU(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU",fmuType="me",version="2.0",platforms={"static"}) Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.009319/0.009319, allocations: 99.34 kB / 15.73 MB, free: 6.008 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001739/0.001739, allocations: 198.4 kB / 16.67 MB, free: 5.934 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.26/1.26, allocations: 222.9 MB / 240.4 MB, free: 4.336 MB / 190.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 11.1.0-master/package.mo): time 2.529/2.529, allocations: 469.4 MB / 0.7422 GB, free: 7.613 MB / 0.5919 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.00144/0.00144, allocations: 67.89 kB / 1.064 GB, free: 13.89 MB / 0.8262 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.3194/0.3209, allocations: 159.1 MB / 1.22 GB, free: 14.65 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.6782/0.9991, allocations: 31.75 MB / 1.251 GB, free: 4.832 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01734/1.016, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.263 GB, free: 4.629 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002668/1.019, allocations: 64.84 kB / 1.263 GB, free: 4.625 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003434/1.023, allocations: 1.124 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 4.504 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.00676/1.029, allocations: 2.15 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 3.977 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.00655/1.036, allocations: 1.866 MB / 1.268 GB, free: 3.762 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.0259/1.062, allocations: 19.59 MB / 1.287 GB, free: 14.55 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01264/1.075, allocations: 7.201 MB / 1.294 GB, free: 11.93 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01703/1.092, allocations: 6.529 MB / 1.3 GB, free: 9.672 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01312/1.105, allocations: 5.358 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 7.664 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003811/1.109, allocations: 0.7534 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 7.66 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01194/1.121, allocations: 3.211 MB / 1.309 GB, free: 6.988 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006669/1.127, allocations: 3 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 5.68 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01367/1.141, allocations: 4.752 MB / 1.317 GB, free: 2.754 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02701/1.168, allocations: 15.49 MB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.844e-06/1.168, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.804e-06/1.168, allocations: 1.281 kB / 1.332 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005468/1.169, allocations: 0 / 1.332 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.04288/1.212, allocations: 11.76 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.875 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.995e-05/1.212, allocations: 7.688 kB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.875 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt introduceOutputAliases (simulation): time 0.002441/1.214, allocations: 0.4924 MB / 1.344 GB, free: 2.52 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.00576/1.22, allocations: 0.9216 MB / 1.345 GB, free: 2.035 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02633/1.246, allocations: 9.676 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 10.23 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0003865/1.247, allocations: 338.6 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 9.902 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002924/1.25, allocations: 475.9 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 9.438 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01706/1.267, allocations: 5.964 MB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.238 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001924/1.267, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.23 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001649/1.269, allocations: 154.1 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 3.082 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001471/1.269, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.361 GB, free: 2.988 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01106/1.28, allocations: 4.758 MB / 1.366 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06896/1.349, allocations: 33.81 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 10.92 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01301/1.362, allocations: 6.224 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 4.641 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004708/1.367, allocations: 2.552 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 2.098 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03521/1.402, allocations: 13.24 MB / 1.421 GB, free: 4.363 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.005101/1.407, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.423 GB, free: 2.207 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 8.246e-06/1.407, allocations: 0 / 1.423 GB, free: 2.207 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.04032/1.447, allocations: 14.29 MB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.762 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 9.933e-05/1.448, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.437 GB, free: 3.609 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02699/1.475, allocations: 10.44 MB / 1.447 GB, free: 9.18 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001597/1.476, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.447 GB, free: 9.059 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006518/1.483, allocations: 3.34 MB / 1.45 GB, free: 5.73 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002638/1.485, allocations: 0.9121 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 4.828 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005337/1.491, allocations: 1.206 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 3.613 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.000112/1.491, allocations: 317.1 kB / 1.453 GB, free: 3.301 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.006889/1.498, allocations: 3.448 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 15.84 MB / 1.154 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008657/1.507, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.462 GB, free: 8.699 MB / 1.154 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.06608/1.573, allocations: 36.65 MB / 1.498 GB, free: 2.602 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.38e-05/1.573, allocations: 24 kB / 1.498 GB, free: 2.578 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02358/1.596, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.507 GB, free: 8.387 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001589/1.597, allocations: 69.88 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.312 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001657/1.597, allocations: 92 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 8.223 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002111/1.599, allocations: 0.7045 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 7.496 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.006088/1.605, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.51 GB, free: 6.016 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01281/1.618, allocations: 14.54 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 6.512 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01073/1.629, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.332 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001506/1.63, allocations: 276 kB / 1.525 GB, free: 5.062 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01369/1.644, allocations: 7.079 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 13.97 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008807/1.653, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.538 GB, free: 6.832 MB / 1.232 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06863/1.721, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.574 GB, free: 0.8164 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.0001157/1.722, allocations: 28.31 kB / 1.574 GB, free: 0.7891 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02489/1.746, allocations: 10.11 MB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.594 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001436/1.747, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.52 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001618/1.747, allocations: 84 kB / 1.584 GB, free: 6.438 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.0019/1.749, allocations: 0.7124 MB / 1.585 GB, free: 5.703 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005997/1.755, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.586 GB, free: 4.223 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01267/1.767, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.6 GB, free: 4.742 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.0106/1.778, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.601 GB, free: 3.551 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001487/1.78, allocations: 280 kB / 1.602 GB, free: 3.277 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002737/1.782, allocations: 0.761 MB / 1.602 GB, free: 2.508 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003039/1.785, allocations: 0.6985 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 1.805 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01117/1.797, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.63 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.026e-05/1.797, allocations: 24 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.61 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 2.099e-05/1.797, allocations: 4 kB / 1.608 GB, free: 12.6 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006838/1.804, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.612 GB, free: 8.598 MB / 1.311 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03743/1.841, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.625 GB, free: 11.02 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.964e-05/1.841, allocations: 4 kB / 1.625 GB, free: 11.01 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002769/1.844, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 10.41 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001604/1.845, allocations: 0.5795 MB / 1.626 GB, free: 9.809 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.000549/1.846, allocations: 139.8 kB / 1.626 GB, free: 9.672 MB / 1.326 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0119/1.858, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.64 GB, free: 10.3 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 7.695e-06/1.858, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.64 GB, free: 10.29 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01407/1.872, allocations: 7.152 MB / 1.647 GB, free: 3.047 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006684/1.879, allocations: 1.699 MB / 1.649 GB, free: 1.324 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003368/1.882, allocations: 127.9 kB / 1.649 GB, free: 1.199 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007225/1.889, allocations: 0.6086 MB / 1.65 GB, free: 0.5898 MB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0008359/1.89, allocations: 169.6 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 432 kB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005732/1.891, allocations: 87.95 kB / 1.65 GB, free: 344 kB / 1.342 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01876/1.91, allocations: 7.335 MB / 1.657 GB, free: 9.012 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.31e-07/1.91, allocations: 3.938 kB / 1.657 GB, free: 9.008 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02229/1.932, allocations: 3.964 MB / 1.661 GB, free: 5.043 MB / 1.357 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.01789/1.95, allocations: 8.226 MB / 1.669 GB, free: 12.76 MB / 1.373 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02475/1.975, allocations: 13.44 MB / 1.682 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.376e-05/1.975, allocations: 4 kB / 1.682 GB, free: 15.14 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005307/1.98, allocations: 3.044 MB / 1.685 GB, free: 12 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.0195/2, allocations: 2.941 MB / 1.688 GB, free: 9.105 MB / 1.389 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.1796/2.179, allocations: 80.01 MB / 1.766 GB, free: 5.711 MB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01122/2.191, allocations: 5.369 MB / 1.771 GB, free: 312 kB / 1.467 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.01702/2.208, allocations: 6.434 MB / 1.778 GB, free: 9.879 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.009894/2.218, allocations: 2.979 MB / 1.781 GB, free: 6.898 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 9.92e-07/2.218, allocations: 0 / 1.781 GB, free: 6.898 MB / 1.482 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate the FMI files: time 0.889/3.107, allocations: 201.9 MB / 1.978 GB, free: 414 MB / 1.514 GB Notification: Performance of buildModelFMU: Generate platform static: time 24.48/27.59, allocations: 9.562 kB / 1.978 GB, free: 414 MB / 1.514 GB (rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & python3 -m fmpy simulate --output-file Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv --start-time 0 --stop-time 86400 --timeout 50 --relative-tolerance 1e-06 --interface-type ModelExchange --solver CVode --output-interval 34.56 Buildings_latest_Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.fmu > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.csv","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/master/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches