Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.0.0-master/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false)
Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo)
Using package Buildings with version 10.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.0.0-master/package.mo)
Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="empty",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference")
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.0.0-master/package.mo): time 2.242/2.242, allocations: 391.2 MB / 407 MB, free: 10.84 MB / 314.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001352/0.001352, allocations: 199.4 kB / 499.1 MB, free: 4.617 MB / 394.7 MB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.624/1.624, allocations: 222.9 MB / 0.7948 GB, free: 15.76 MB / 0.5573 GB
Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.0009943/0.0009944, allocations: 118.2 kB / 0.9329 GB, free: 7.051 MB / 0.6823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001269/0.001269, allocations: 52.59 kB / 1.081 GB, free: 218.3 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.2961/0.2974, allocations: 140.6 MB / 1.218 GB, free: 117.2 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.02953/0.327, allocations: 31.57 MB / 1.249 GB, free: 85.5 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01679/0.3438, allocations: 12.43 MB / 1.261 GB, free: 73.04 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.002811/0.3467, allocations: 59.62 kB / 1.261 GB, free: 72.98 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.003649/0.3504, allocations: 0.9643 MB / 1.262 GB, free: 72.01 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.006039/0.3565, allocations: 1.924 MB / 1.264 GB, free: 70.08 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.005112/0.3616, allocations: 1.624 MB / 1.266 GB, free: 68.46 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.01971/0.3814, allocations: 22.55 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 45.87 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.00876/0.3902, allocations: 5.578 MB / 1.293 GB, free: 40.21 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.009642/0.3998, allocations: 5.158 MB / 1.298 GB, free: 35.04 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.009447/0.4093, allocations: 5.039 MB / 1.303 GB, free: 29.98 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.002437/0.4118, allocations: 312 kB / 1.303 GB, free: 29.68 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.00699/0.4188, allocations: 2.703 MB / 1.306 GB, free: 26.97 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.003961/0.4228, allocations: 2.371 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 24.59 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.009127/0.432, allocations: 4.026 MB / 1.312 GB, free: 20.54 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0168/0.4488, allocations: 14.97 MB / 1.327 GB, free: 5.531 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 7.644e-06/0.4489, allocations: 4 kB / 1.327 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.745e-06/0.4489, allocations: 0 / 1.327 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005516/0.4495, allocations: 0 / 1.327 GB, free: 5.527 MB / 0.823 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end:
 * Number of equations: 866
 * Number of variables: 866
Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03319/0.4827, allocations: 11.48 MB / 1.338 GB, free: 9.934 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 4.731e-05/0.4827, allocations: 15.98 kB / 1.338 GB, free: 9.918 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.004288/0.487, allocations: 0.8727 MB / 1.339 GB, free: 9.035 MB / 0.8386 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02588/0.5129, allocations: 9.434 MB / 1.348 GB, free: 15.53 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004415/0.5134, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.348 GB, free: 15.2 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002204/0.5156, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.349 GB, free: 14.73 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01498/0.5306, allocations: 5.956 MB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.535 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001643/0.5309, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.52 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.001161/0.532, allocations: 147.9 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.375 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001216/0.5322, allocations: 95.98 kB / 1.355 GB, free: 8.281 MB / 0.8542 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009918/0.5421, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.36 GB, free: 3.508 MB / 0.8542 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06743/0.6096, allocations: 33.78 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 76 kB / 0.8855 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01368/0.6233, allocations: 6.222 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 9.742 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.00451/0.6279, allocations: 2.509 MB / 1.401 GB, free: 7.234 MB / 0.9011 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02948/0.6574, allocations: 13.2 MB / 1.414 GB, free: 9.488 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004139/0.6616, allocations: 2.134 MB / 1.416 GB, free: 7.332 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 7.194e-06/0.6616, allocations: 4 kB / 1.416 GB, free: 7.328 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.5785/1.24, allocations: 14.01 MB / 1.43 GB, free: 180.4 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.796e-05/1.24, allocations: 130.5 kB / 1.43 GB, free: 180.2 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02402/1.264, allocations: 10.36 MB / 1.44 GB, free: 177.2 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.0008777/1.265, allocations: 119.5 kB / 1.44 GB, free: 177.1 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004577/1.27, allocations: 3.3 MB / 1.443 GB, free: 174.7 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.00179/1.272, allocations: 0.8699 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 174.1 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003596/1.275, allocations: 1.212 MB / 1.445 GB, free: 173.5 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 4.066e-05/1.275, allocations: 301.9 kB / 1.446 GB, free: 173.2 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.004904/1.28, allocations: 3.457 MB / 1.449 GB, free: 172.3 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006151/1.286, allocations: 5.934 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 168.2 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.05623/1.343, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.491 GB, free: 139.2 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 0.000175/1.343, allocations: 24 kB / 1.491 GB, free: 139.1 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01669/1.36, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.5 GB, free: 129 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001402/1.36, allocations: 71.78 kB / 1.5 GB, free: 128.9 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001444/1.36, allocations: 84 kB / 1.501 GB, free: 128.8 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001627/1.362, allocations: 0.709 MB / 1.501 GB, free: 128.1 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.00519/1.367, allocations: 1.486 MB / 1.503 GB, free: 126.6 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008566/1.375, allocations: 13.41 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 112.3 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01138/1.387, allocations: 1.306 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 111 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001515/1.388, allocations: 272.9 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 110.7 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01246/1.401, allocations: 7.09 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 103.6 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.007311/1.408, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 96.46 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start)
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]))
Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.04985/1.458, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 58.46 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 6.614e-05/1.458, allocations: 24 kB / 1.566 GB, free: 58.43 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01642/1.475, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 48.28 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 9.219e-05/1.475, allocations: 77.69 kB / 1.576 GB, free: 48.2 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001199/1.475, allocations: 84 kB / 1.576 GB, free: 48.11 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001473/1.476, allocations: 0.7105 MB / 1.576 GB, free: 47.38 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005002/1.481, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.578 GB, free: 45.9 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.008406/1.49, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.591 GB, free: 31.58 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01058/1.5, allocations: 1.302 MB / 1.592 GB, free: 30.27 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001315/1.502, allocations: 276 kB / 1.593 GB, free: 30 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system:
         sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start
         sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])
         sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]).
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 384
 * Number of states: 0 ()
 * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1)
 * Number of discrete states: 0 ()
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635):
 * Single equations (assignments): 627
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 1
 * Record equations: 0
 * When equations: 0
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0024/1.504, allocations: 0.763 MB / 1.593 GB, free: 29.24 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002911/1.507, allocations: 0.6555 MB / 1.594 GB, free: 28.57 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.009518/1.517, allocations: 5.156 MB / 1.599 GB, free: 23.38 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 2.531e-05/1.517, allocations: 28 kB / 1.599 GB, free: 23.36 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.913e-05/1.517, allocations: 4 kB / 1.599 GB, free: 23.35 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.004915/1.522, allocations: 3.958 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 19.36 MB / 0.9167 GB
Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts.
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03131/1.553, allocations: 13.37 MB / 1.616 GB, free: 5.812 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.839e-05/1.553, allocations: 4.281 kB / 1.616 GB, free: 5.809 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002615/1.556, allocations: 0.6007 MB / 1.617 GB, free: 5.207 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001692/1.557, allocations: 0.5794 MB / 1.617 GB, free: 4.605 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005047/1.558, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.617 GB, free: 4.473 MB / 0.9167 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01094/1.569, allocations: 13.29 MB / 1.63 GB, free: 6.266 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 5.641e-06/1.569, allocations: 4 kB / 1.63 GB, free: 6.262 MB / 0.9323 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.1268/1.696, allocations: 58.61 MB / 1.687 GB, free: 10.32 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.007253/1.703, allocations: 1.656 MB / 1.689 GB, free: 8.637 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.003704/1.707, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.689 GB, free: 8.516 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.007487/1.714, allocations: 0.6938 MB / 1.69 GB, free: 7.82 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0008886/1.715, allocations: 165.7 kB / 1.69 GB, free: 7.66 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0005628/1.716, allocations: 83.95 kB / 1.69 GB, free: 7.578 MB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01749/1.733, allocations: 7.284 MB / 1.697 GB, free: 312 kB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 4.11e-07/1.733, allocations: 0 / 1.697 GB, free: 312 kB / 0.9948 GB
Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.03703/1.77, allocations: 6.418 MB / 1.703 GB, free: 9.934 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation:
 * Number of independent subsystems: 12
 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T)
 * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count)
 * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count)
 * Number of clocked states: 0 ()
 * Top-level inputs: 0
Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210):
 * Single equations (assignments): 199
 * Array equations: 0
 * Algorithm blocks: 0
 * Record equations: 2
 * When equations: 2
 * If-equations: 0
 * Equation systems (not torn): 0
 * Torn equation systems: 7
 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0
Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set:
 * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems
   {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)}
 * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems
Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.003499/1.774, allocations: 0.7464 MB / 1.704 GB, free: 9.281 MB / 1.01 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02387/1.798, allocations: 13.39 MB / 1.717 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.209e-05/1.798, allocations: 4 kB / 1.717 GB, free: 11.71 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.005142/1.803, allocations: 3.058 MB / 1.72 GB, free: 8.555 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01881/1.822, allocations: 2.775 MB / 1.723 GB, free: 5.797 MB / 1.026 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04764/1.87, allocations: 23.83 MB / 1.746 GB, free: 13.82 MB / 1.057 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.01047/1.88, allocations: 5.452 MB / 1.752 GB, free: 8.332 MB / 1.057 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: alias equations: time 0.0179/1.898, allocations: 6.474 MB / 1.758 GB, free: 1.871 MB / 1.057 GB
Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003652/1.902, allocations: 455.3 kB / 1.758 GB, free: 1.426 MB / 1.057 GB
Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.012e-06/1.902, allocations: 0 / 1.758 GB, free: 1.426 MB / 1.057 GB
Notification: Performance of Templates: time 0.7929/2.695, allocations: 158 MB / 1.913 GB, free: 352 MB / 1.151 GB
make -j1 -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile
(rm -f Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference  -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_latest_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1)