Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 9.1.3 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001429/0.00143, allocations: 109 kB / 16.41 MB, free: 6.492 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001393/0.001393, allocations: 189.5 kB / 17.34 MB, free: 5.762 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.401/1.401, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.14 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 9.1.3-maint.9.1.x/package.mo): time 2.294/2.294, allocations: 390.3 MB / 0.6655 GB, free: 0.6484 MB / 0.5294 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.001717/0.001717, allocations: 71.89 kB / 0.9516 GB, free: 7.59 MB / 0.7325 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 0.9607/0.9625, allocations: 140.4 MB / 1.089 GB, free: 5.5 MB / 0.8575 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference): time 0.04135/1.004, allocations: 31.76 MB / 1.12 GB, free: 14.78 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.02248/1.026, allocations: 12.3 MB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.07 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.004082/1.031, allocations: 64.38 kB / 1.132 GB, free: 6.047 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004723/1.035, allocations: 1.104 MB / 1.133 GB, free: 5.457 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.008577/1.044, allocations: 2.071 MB / 1.135 GB, free: 4.254 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.007544/1.051, allocations: 1.876 MB / 1.137 GB, free: 3.316 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.03204/1.084, allocations: 19.55 MB / 1.156 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.0151/1.099, allocations: 7.202 MB / 1.163 GB, free: 7.816 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01639/1.115, allocations: 6.532 MB / 1.169 GB, free: 4.5 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01352/1.129, allocations: 5.344 MB / 1.174 GB, free: 1.289 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.004139/1.133, allocations: 0.7489 MB / 1.175 GB, free: 1.289 MB / 0.9044 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01187/1.145, allocations: 3.225 MB / 1.178 GB, free: 15.82 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006258/1.151, allocations: 3.001 MB / 1.181 GB, free: 13.77 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01547/1.167, allocations: 4.752 MB / 1.186 GB, free: 10.48 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.0282/1.195, allocations: 15.43 MB / 1.201 GB, free: 11.01 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 9.669e-06/1.195, allocations: 4 kB / 1.201 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 2.465e-06/1.195, allocations: 0 / 1.201 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005376/1.195, allocations: 4 kB / 1.201 GB, free: 11 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03703/1.232, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.4 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.166e-05/1.232, allocations: 8.031 kB / 1.212 GB, free: 15.39 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.006212/1.239, allocations: 0.8764 MB / 1.213 GB, free: 14.5 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02439/1.263, allocations: 9.627 MB / 1.222 GB, free: 4.805 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004289/1.264, allocations: 334.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.477 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002358/1.266, allocations: 479.8 kB / 1.223 GB, free: 4.008 MB / 0.9512 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01407/1.28, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.81 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0001325/1.28, allocations: 11.88 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.8 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.0009846/1.281, allocations: 155.9 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.65 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.000111/1.281, allocations: 88 kB / 1.229 GB, free: 13.56 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.009032/1.29, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.234 GB, free: 8.789 MB / 0.9669 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.06069/1.351, allocations: 33.76 MB / 1.267 GB, free: 5.375 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01294/1.364, allocations: 6.233 MB / 1.273 GB, free: 15.04 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.004408/1.369, allocations: 2.553 MB / 1.275 GB, free: 12.48 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.02708/1.396, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.288 GB, free: 14.71 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.003633/1.399, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.29 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 4.619e-06/1.399, allocations: 0 / 1.29 GB, free: 12.55 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.0299/1.429, allocations: 14 MB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.35 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 8.113e-05/1.429, allocations: 144.7 kB / 1.304 GB, free: 14.19 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.02119/1.451, allocations: 10.42 MB / 1.314 GB, free: 3.77 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001084/1.452, allocations: 117.7 kB / 1.315 GB, free: 3.648 MB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.004814/1.456, allocations: 3.297 MB / 1.318 GB, free: 336 kB / 1.045 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002005/1.459, allocations: 0.8747 MB / 1.319 GB, free: 15.44 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.003502/1.462, allocations: 1.209 MB / 1.32 GB, free: 14.22 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 9.233e-05/1.462, allocations: 305.1 kB / 1.32 GB, free: 13.92 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.005263/1.467, allocations: 3.443 MB / 1.323 GB, free: 10.46 MB / 1.061 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.006836/1.474, allocations: 5.936 MB / 1.329 GB, free: 3.316 MB / 1.061 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.0572/1.531, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.23 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 7.846e-05/1.532, allocations: 24 kB / 1.365 GB, free: 13.2 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.01834/1.55, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.375 GB, free: 3.043 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001136/1.55, allocations: 69.7 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.969 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001277/1.55, allocations: 87.94 kB / 1.375 GB, free: 2.883 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001683/1.552, allocations: 0.7123 MB / 1.376 GB, free: 2.148 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005211/1.557, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.377 GB, free: 0.668 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0123/1.569, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.391 GB, free: 1.16 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009748/1.579, allocations: 1.189 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.96 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001419/1.581, allocations: 275.9 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 15.7 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01294/1.594, allocations: 7.088 MB / 1.4 GB, free: 8.598 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.008342/1.602, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.405 GB, free: 1.465 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06055/1.663, allocations: 36.57 MB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.44 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 8.874e-05/1.663, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.441 GB, free: 11.41 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02584/1.689, allocations: 10.07 MB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.258 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002002/1.689, allocations: 71.88 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.184 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002066/1.689, allocations: 87.98 kB / 1.451 GB, free: 1.098 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001976/1.691, allocations: 0.7087 MB / 1.452 GB, free: 376 kB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005412/1.696, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.453 GB, free: 14.89 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01233/1.709, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.468 GB, free: 15.38 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.009918/1.719, allocations: 1.174 MB / 1.469 GB, free: 14.2 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001355/1.72, allocations: 279.9 kB / 1.469 GB, free: 13.93 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002477/1.723, allocations: 0.7528 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 13.16 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.002945/1.726, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 12.49 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.0116/1.737, allocations: 5.144 MB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.309 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 4.279e-05/1.737, allocations: 27.94 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.281 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 3.009e-05/1.737, allocations: 4 kB / 1.475 GB, free: 7.277 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.006471/1.744, allocations: 3.954 MB / 1.479 GB, free: 3.285 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.03089/1.775, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.633 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.693e-05/1.775, allocations: 7.938 kB / 1.492 GB, free: 5.625 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002868/1.778, allocations: 0.601 MB / 1.493 GB, free: 5.023 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001874/1.78, allocations: 0.5755 MB / 1.494 GB, free: 4.426 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0005112/1.78, allocations: 135.9 kB / 1.494 GB, free: 4.293 MB / 1.232 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.0125/1.793, allocations: 14.39 MB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.918 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.812e-06/1.793, allocations: 4 kB / 1.508 GB, free: 4.914 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01366/1.806, allocations: 7.121 MB / 1.515 GB, free: 13.7 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.00528/1.812, allocations: 1.66 MB / 1.516 GB, free: 12.02 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002972/1.815, allocations: 123.9 kB / 1.516 GB, free: 11.89 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006205/1.821, allocations: 0.6199 MB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.27 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0006195/1.822, allocations: 161.7 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.12 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0003695/1.822, allocations: 91.89 kB / 1.517 GB, free: 11.03 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01668/1.839, allocations: 7.339 MB / 1.524 GB, free: 3.699 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 3.71e-07/1.839, allocations: 0 / 1.524 GB, free: 3.699 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.01907/1.858, allocations: 3.957 MB / 1.528 GB, free: 15.74 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002644/1.86, allocations: 0.586 MB / 1.529 GB, free: 15.16 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.02523/1.886, allocations: 13.43 MB / 1.542 GB, free: 1.547 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.659e-05/1.886, allocations: 4 kB / 1.542 GB, free: 1.543 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.007031/1.893, allocations: 3.032 MB / 1.545 GB, free: 14.41 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.02203/1.915, allocations: 2.933 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 11.53 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.04241/1.957, allocations: 19.03 MB / 1.566 GB, free: 8.43 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.007163/1.965, allocations: 5.365 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 3.02 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003088/1.968, allocations: 455.3 kB / 1.572 GB, free: 2.574 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.122e-06/1.968, allocations: 0 / 1.572 GB, free: 2.574 MB / 1.311 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.139/3.107, allocations: 478.6 MB / 2.039 GB, free: 11.87 MB / 1.326 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.makefile (rm -f Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.sim & ./Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_9.1.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseFiniteDifference.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_9_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseFiniteDifference.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches