Running: ./testmodel.py --libraries=/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries --ompython_omhome=/usr Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.conf.json loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo", uses=false) loadFile("/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo", uses=false) Using package Buildings with version 10.1.1 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo) Using package Modelica with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package Complex with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Using package ModelicaServices with version 4.0.0 (/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo) Running command: translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") translateModel(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU,tolerance=1e-06,outputFormat="mat",numberOfIntervals=5000,variableFilter="time|sla.sta_b.T|sla.surf_a.T|sla.surf_b.T|sla.surf_a.Q_flow|sla.surf_b.Q_flow",fileNamePrefix="Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU") Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/ModelicaServices 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001499/0.001499, allocations: 110.5 kB / 16.41 MB, free: 6.504 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Complex 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 0.001602/0.001602, allocations: 188.1 kB / 17.34 MB, free: 5.762 MB / 14.72 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Modelica 4.0.0+maint.om/package.mo): time 1.499/1.499, allocations: 222.9 MB / 241 MB, free: 15.14 MB / 206.1 MB Notification: Performance of loadFile(/home/hudson/saved_omc/libraries/.openmodelica/libraries/Buildings 10.1.1-maint.10.0.x/package.mo): time 2.53/2.53, allocations: 437 MB / 0.7112 GB, free: 4.395 MB / 0.5762 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - loaded program: time 0.002519/0.002519, allocations: 68.12 kB / 1.019 GB, free: 9.395 MB / 0.795 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - Absyn->SCode: time 1.044/1.047, allocations: 151.6 MB / 1.167 GB, free: 3.855 MB / 0.8887 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instantiate(Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU): time 0.03612/1.083, allocations: 31.78 MB / 1.198 GB, free: 3.961 MB / 0.92 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.instExpressions: time 0.01995/1.103, allocations: 12.29 MB / 1.21 GB, free: 7.637 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFInst.updateImplicitVariability: time 0.003173/1.106, allocations: 59.69 kB / 1.21 GB, free: 7.578 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeComponents: time 0.004208/1.11, allocations: 1.115 MB / 1.211 GB, free: 6.457 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeBindings: time 0.007788/1.118, allocations: 2.149 MB / 1.214 GB, free: 4.301 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFTyping.typeClassSections: time 0.006636/1.125, allocations: 1.874 MB / 1.215 GB, free: 2.434 MB / 0.9356 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.flatten: time 0.02506/1.15, allocations: 19.57 MB / 1.235 GB, free: 14.82 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.resolveConnections: time 0.01005/1.16, allocations: 7.197 MB / 1.242 GB, free: 7.547 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFEvalConstants.evaluate: time 0.01416/1.174, allocations: 6.537 MB / 1.248 GB, free: 1.008 MB / 0.9669 GB Notification: Performance of NFSimplifyModel.simplify: time 0.01122/1.186, allocations: 5.352 MB / 1.253 GB, free: 11.63 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFPackage.collectConstants: time 0.003545/1.189, allocations: 0.75 MB / 1.254 GB, free: 10.88 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFFlatten.collectFunctions: time 0.01032/1.199, allocations: 3.219 MB / 1.257 GB, free: 7.664 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFScalarize.scalarize: time 0.006135/1.206, allocations: 3 MB / 1.26 GB, free: 4.656 MB / 0.9825 GB Notification: Performance of NFVerifyModel.verify: time 0.01236/1.218, allocations: 4.745 MB / 1.265 GB, free: 15.89 MB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of NFConvertDAE.convert: time 0.02371/1.242, allocations: 15.44 MB / 1.28 GB, free: 416 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd - DAE generated: time 5.44e-06/1.242, allocations: 0 / 1.28 GB, free: 416 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of FrontEnd: time 1.443e-06/1.242, allocations: 0 / 1.28 GB, free: 416 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Performance of Transformations before backend: time 0.0005174/1.242, allocations: 4 kB / 1.28 GB, free: 412 kB / 0.9981 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the front-end and creating the data structures used by the back-end: * Number of equations: 866 * Number of variables: 866 Notification: Performance of Generate backend data structure: time 0.03623/1.279, allocations: 11.49 MB / 1.291 GB, free: 4.801 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of prepare preOptimizeDAE: time 5.411e-05/1.279, allocations: 8.922 kB / 1.291 GB, free: 4.793 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt normalInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.005218/1.284, allocations: 0.881 MB / 1.292 GB, free: 3.902 MB / 1.014 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evaluateParameters (simulation): time 0.02804/1.312, allocations: 9.609 MB / 1.301 GB, free: 10.21 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt simplifyIfEquations (simulation): time 0.0004617/1.312, allocations: 338.8 kB / 1.301 GB, free: 9.883 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt expandDerOperator (simulation): time 0.002486/1.315, allocations: 483.8 kB / 1.302 GB, free: 9.41 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt clockPartitioning (simulation): time 0.01616/1.331, allocations: 5.96 MB / 1.308 GB, free: 3.215 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt findStateOrder (simulation): time 0.0002903/1.332, allocations: 15.88 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 3.199 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt replaceEdgeChange (simulation): time 0.00181/1.333, allocations: 148 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 3.055 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 0.0001556/1.334, allocations: 91.98 kB / 1.308 GB, free: 2.965 MB / 1.029 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt removeEqualRHS (simulation): time 0.01147/1.345, allocations: 4.762 MB / 1.313 GB, free: 14.19 MB / 1.045 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of preOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.07044/1.415, allocations: 33.75 MB / 1.346 GB, free: 10.79 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt comSubExp (simulation): time 0.01405/1.43, allocations: 6.242 MB / 1.352 GB, free: 4.445 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt resolveLoops (simulation): time 0.005173/1.435, allocations: 2.545 MB / 1.354 GB, free: 1.898 MB / 1.076 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt evalFunc (simulation): time 0.03449/1.469, allocations: 13.23 MB / 1.367 GB, free: 4.125 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of preOpt encapsulateWhenConditions (simulation): time 0.004658/1.474, allocations: 2.137 MB / 1.369 GB, free: 1.969 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of pre-optimization done (n=224): time 8.336e-06/1.474, allocations: 0 / 1.369 GB, free: 1.969 MB / 1.092 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=232): time 0.03924/1.513, allocations: 14.02 MB / 1.383 GB, free: 3.758 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of inlineWhenForInitialization (initialization): time 0.0001228/1.514, allocations: 128.8 kB / 1.383 GB, free: 3.605 MB / 1.107 GB Notification: Performance of selectInitializationVariablesDAE (initialization): time 0.0308/1.544, allocations: 10.43 MB / 1.393 GB, free: 9.184 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectPreVariables (initialization): time 0.001365/1.546, allocations: 121.7 kB / 1.393 GB, free: 9.059 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialEqns (initialization): time 0.006418/1.552, allocations: 3.301 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 5.734 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of collectInitialBindings (initialization): time 0.002533/1.555, allocations: 0.8707 MB / 1.397 GB, free: 4.852 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of simplifyInitialFunctions (initialization): time 0.005872/1.561, allocations: 1.202 MB / 1.399 GB, free: 3.641 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of setup shared object (initialization): time 0.0001353/1.561, allocations: 312.9 kB / 1.399 GB, free: 3.332 MB / 1.123 GB Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.007813/1.569, allocations: 3.455 MB / 1.402 GB, free: 15.86 MB / 1.139 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization): time 0.008939/1.578, allocations: 5.932 MB / 1.408 GB, free: 8.723 MB / 1.139 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization): time 0.07223/1.65, allocations: 36.64 MB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.629 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization): time 8.955e-05/1.65, allocations: 24 kB / 1.444 GB, free: 2.605 MB / 1.17 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization): time 0.02538/1.675, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.454 GB, free: 8.438 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0002247/1.676, allocations: 70.7 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 8.363 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0002679/1.676, allocations: 84.06 kB / 1.454 GB, free: 8.281 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.002415/1.678, allocations: 0.7162 MB / 1.455 GB, free: 7.543 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.007021/1.686, allocations: 1.478 MB / 1.456 GB, free: 6.062 MB / 1.186 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.0181/1.704, allocations: 14.51 MB / 1.47 GB, free: 6.566 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01125/1.715, allocations: 1.185 MB / 1.471 GB, free: 5.379 MB / 1.201 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001598/1.717, allocations: 280 kB / 1.472 GB, free: 5.105 MB / 1.201 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Performance of preBalanceInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.01418/1.731, allocations: 7.08 MB / 1.478 GB, free: 14.02 MB / 1.217 GB Notification: Performance of partitionIndependentBlocks (initialization_lambda0): time 0.009253/1.74, allocations: 5.928 MB / 1.484 GB, free: 6.883 MB / 1.217 GB Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start (sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T_a_start = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3])) Warning: It was not possible to determine if the initialization problem is consistent, because of not evaluable parameters/start values during compile time: sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]) (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[5].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[5].lay[2].RNod[3]) = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3])) Notification: Performance of analyzeInitialSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 0.06409/1.804, allocations: 36.56 MB / 1.52 GB, free: 0.8672 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of solveInitialSystemEqSystem (initialization_lambda0): time 7.932e-05/1.804, allocations: 24 kB / 1.52 GB, free: 0.8438 MB / 1.248 GB Notification: Performance of matching and sorting (n=659) (initialization_lambda0): time 0.02149/1.826, allocations: 10.08 MB / 1.53 GB, free: 6.68 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.0001438/1.826, allocations: 73.7 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 6.602 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (initialization): time 0.0001833/1.826, allocations: 84 kB / 1.53 GB, free: 6.52 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (initialization): time 0.001829/1.828, allocations: 0.7085 MB / 1.531 GB, free: 5.789 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (initialization): time 0.005544/1.834, allocations: 1.474 MB / 1.532 GB, free: 4.312 MB / 1.264 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (initialization): time 0.01349/1.847, allocations: 14.53 MB / 1.546 GB, free: 4.801 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (initialization): time 0.01274/1.86, allocations: 1.178 MB / 1.547 GB, free: 3.621 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (initialization): time 0.001869/1.862, allocations: 280 kB / 1.548 GB, free: 3.348 MB / 1.279 GB Warning: The initial conditions are over specified. The following 8 initial equations are redundant, so they are removed from the initialization_lambda0 system: sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[1] = sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T_a_start sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[1].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[1].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[2].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[2].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[3].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[3].lay[2].RNod[3]) sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[3] = sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start + (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_b_start - sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T_a_start) * sla.con_b[4].lay[2].UA * (sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[1] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[2] + sla.con_b[4].lay[2].RNod[3]). Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for initialization: * Number of independent subsystems: 384 * Number of states: 0 () * Number of discrete variables: 5 ($PRE.pulse.count,$PRE.pulse.T_start,pulse.count,pulse.T_start,$whenCondition1) * Number of discrete states: 0 () * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for initialization (635): * Single equations (assignments): 627 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 1 * Record equations: 0 * When equations: 0 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of prepare postOptimizeDAE: time 0.002965/1.865, allocations: 0.7579 MB / 1.548 GB, free: 2.586 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt lateInlineFunction (simulation): time 0.003288/1.868, allocations: 0.6672 MB / 1.549 GB, free: 1.91 MB / 1.279 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt wrapFunctionCalls (simulation): time 0.01093/1.879, allocations: 5.15 MB / 1.554 GB, free: 12.72 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inlineArrayEqn (simulation): time 3.115e-05/1.879, allocations: 24 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 12.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt constantLinearSystem (simulation): time 1.092e-05/1.879, allocations: 4 kB / 1.554 GB, free: 12.69 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifysemiLinear (simulation): time 0.00576/1.885, allocations: 3.962 MB / 1.558 GB, free: 8.695 MB / 1.295 GB Warning: The model contains alias variables with redundant start and/or conflicting nominal values. It is recommended to resolve the conflicts, because otherwise the system could be hard to solve. To print the conflicting alias sets and the chosen candidates please use -d=aliasConflicts. Notification: Performance of postOpt removeSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.9712/2.856, allocations: 13.4 MB / 1.571 GB, free: 368.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyComplexFunction (simulation): time 1.194e-05/2.856, allocations: 3.969 kB / 1.571 GB, free: 368.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt solveSimpleEquations (simulation): time 0.002532/2.859, allocations: 0.6081 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 368.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt tearingSystem (simulation): time 0.001619/2.86, allocations: 0.5762 MB / 1.572 GB, free: 368.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt inputDerivativesUsed (simulation): time 0.0003554/2.861, allocations: 133.9 kB / 1.572 GB, free: 368.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStrongComponentJacobians (simulation): time 0.01029/2.871, allocations: 14.38 MB / 1.586 GB, free: 357.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt calculateStateSetsJacobians (simulation): time 6.342e-06/2.871, allocations: 8.906 kB / 1.586 GB, free: 357.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt symbolicJacobian (simulation): time 0.01243/2.884, allocations: 7.118 MB / 1.593 GB, free: 355.6 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt removeConstants (simulation): time 0.006593/2.89, allocations: 1.668 MB / 1.595 GB, free: 355.2 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyTimeIndepFuncCalls (simulation): time 0.002837/2.893, allocations: 126.5 kB / 1.595 GB, free: 355.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt simplifyAllExpressions (simulation): time 0.006149/2.899, allocations: 0.6136 MB / 1.596 GB, free: 355.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt findZeroCrossings (simulation): time 0.0005288/2.9, allocations: 165.1 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 355.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of postOpt collapseArrayExpressions (simulation): time 0.0002877/2.9, allocations: 85.06 kB / 1.596 GB, free: 355 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of sorting global known variables: time 0.01584/2.916, allocations: 7.337 MB / 1.603 GB, free: 352.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of sort global known variables: time 7.82e-07/2.916, allocations: 0 / 1.603 GB, free: 352.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of remove unused functions: time 0.02116/2.937, allocations: 3.963 MB / 1.607 GB, free: 349.9 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Model statistics after passing the back-end for simulation: * Number of independent subsystems: 12 * Number of states: 43 (sla.vol[1].dynBal.U,sla.vol[2].dynBal.U,sla.vol[3].dynBal.U,sla.vol[4].dynBal.U,sla.vol[5].dynBal.U,sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[1].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[2].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[3].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[4].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[2],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[3],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[4],sla.con_a[5].lay[1].T[5],sla.con_b[1].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[1].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[2].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[2].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[3].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[3].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[4].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[4].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[1].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[1],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[2],sla.con_b[5].lay[2].T[3],TOut.T) * Number of discrete variables: 3 ($whenCondition1,pulse.T_start,pulse.count) * Number of discrete states: 1 (pulse.count) * Number of clocked states: 0 () * Top-level inputs: 0 Notification: Strong component statistics for simulation (210): * Single equations (assignments): 199 * Array equations: 0 * Algorithm blocks: 0 * Record equations: 2 * When equations: 2 * If-equations: 0 * Equation systems (not torn): 0 * Torn equation systems: 7 * Mixed (continuous/discrete) equation systems: 0 Notification: Torn system details for strict tearing set: * Linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars, density): 7 systems {(1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,9,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%), (1,1,100.0%)} * Non-linear torn systems (#iteration vars, #inner vars): 0 systems Notification: Performance of Backend phase and start with SimCode phase: time 0.002504/2.94, allocations: 0.5985 MB / 1.608 GB, free: 349.5 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created initialization part: time 0.01974/2.959, allocations: 13.42 MB / 1.621 GB, free: 336.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created event and clocks part: time 1.367e-05/2.96, allocations: 4 kB / 1.621 GB, free: 336.8 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created simulation system equations: time 0.004267/2.964, allocations: 3.029 MB / 1.624 GB, free: 333.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created of all other equations (e.g. parameter, nominal, assert, etc): time 0.01818/2.982, allocations: 2.932 MB / 1.627 GB, free: 331 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: created linear, non-linear and system jacobian parts: time 0.03657/3.019, allocations: 19 MB / 1.645 GB, free: 312.1 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: some other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.005882/3.025, allocations: 5.373 MB / 1.65 GB, free: 306.7 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of simCode: all other stuff during SimCode phase: time 0.003163/3.028, allocations: 451.3 kB / 1.651 GB, free: 306.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of SimCode: time 1.573e-06/3.028, allocations: 0 / 1.651 GB, free: 306.3 MB / 1.295 GB Notification: Performance of Templates: time 1.341/4.369, allocations: 478.6 MB / 2.118 GB, free: 0.5111 GB / 1.467 GB make -j1 -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.makefile (rm -f Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; mkfifo Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe ; head -c 1048576 < Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe >> ../files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.sim & ./Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU -abortSlowSimulation -alarm=480 -emit_protected -lv LOG_STATS > Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.pipe 2>&1) diffSimulationResults("Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU_res.mat","/mnt/ReferenceFiles/Buildings/csv/maint_10.0.x/Buildings_Fluid_HeatExchangers_RadiantSlabs_Examples_StepResponseEpsilonNTU.csv","/var/lib/jenkins1/ws/OpenModelicaLibraryTestingWork/OpenModelicaLibraryTesting/files/Buildings_10_Buildings.Fluid.HeatExchangers.RadiantSlabs.Examples.StepResponseEpsilonNTU.diff",relTol=0.003,relTolDiffMinMax=0.003,rangeDelta=0.001) Reference file matches